PDA

View Full Version : Swedes Panic as Massive 2.1 Temblor Rocks Stockholm



Kevster
05-25-2006, 11:44 AM
Linkage (http://www.thelocal.se/article.php?ID=3900)

Earthquake shakes Stockholm

Published: 25th May 2006 10:33 CET

A seismologist has confirmed that the vibrations and shaking overnight in Stockholm, which prompted hundreds of residents to call SOS Alarm fearing a mysterious explosion, was in fact an earthquake.

Reynir Bödvarsson at Uppsala University told TT on Thursday morning that the quake was localised in the western part of the city.

"We hardly noticed anything here in Uppsala. But this morning when I analysed the data I saw that it was an earthquake," he said.

Bödvarsson told Swedish Radio that the earthquake measured "a little over two on the Richter scale". The epicentre was located seven kilometres south east of Bromma.

Police thought at first that the quake was an explosion, as hundreds of panic-stricken residents called SOS Alarm. Nobody was injured.

"It was primarily in the vicinity of Alvik, the Essinge islands and Kungsholmen," said Thomas Ibstedt, at Stockholm police.

A resident of Stora Essingen, Hans-Olov Zetterström, was one of those woken by the rumbling.

"It was as though there was rock-blasting being carried out on a building site," he told The Local.

"But it was the middle of the night - and there's no building site near here."

Officers were sent to investigate the incident and a helicopter was called in to help find the cause of the noise.

The rarity of earth tremors in Stockholm meant that this explanation was not even considered by police, who speculated that it could have been an explosion set off by someone from a boat.

But Bödvarsson said that across Sweden these kinds of quakes are not unheard of.

"There are over ten earthquakes like this each year somewhere in Sweden. But when it happens in central Stockholm there are obviously many more people who experience it than when it happens somewhere in Lappland," he said.

"An earthquake of this size can be usually felt within a radius of maybe five to ten kilometres from the epicentre."

There is very little seismic activity in the Stockholm, Uppland and east coast regions. Around Vänern, Bottenviken and Lappland, earthquakes are more common.

Bödvarsson said there was very little risk of further disturbances in Stockholm.

"If there are aftershocks, they will probably be so small that nobody will notice them. That's not to say that there can't be another earthquake in Stockholm, but the probability is not increased because of this."

Ok, I know from experience that a small earthquake like that would feel very much like a shockwave from an explosion, but still: :ptlaugh:

Itsme
05-25-2006, 12:43 PM
Gee, here is Southern California we don't even bother "to get out of bed for a 2.1 quake." :)

cadetevon
05-25-2006, 12:51 PM
Gee, here is Southern California we don't even bother "to get out of bed for a 2.1 quake." :)
:stupid:

zippyjuan
05-25-2006, 01:01 PM
2.1? The guy upstairs walking across his room shakes the place more than that.

dougadam
05-25-2006, 01:50 PM
2.1 is not much.

riskykougra
05-25-2006, 01:59 PM
Depends on if you are used to quakes or not. An earthquake of any size would most likely make me have to change my pants as we dont experience anything like that here....:hihi:

kgsilvas
05-25-2006, 02:13 PM
Depends on if you are used to quakes or not. An earthquake of any size would most likely make me have to change my pants as we dont experience anything like that here....:hihi:

Gee, here is Southern California we don't even bother "to get out of bed for a 2.1 quake." :)
:agree: A 2.1 seems like the equivalent of a large truck rolling by your house.
I was in El Monte for the 5.9 Whittier Narrows quake October 1987 and was thrown to the ground. :thud:
Rode out the 6.7 Northridge Quake in January 1994 in Downey so it was just a rude wake-up call.

Can't imagine getting "shook-up" over a 2.1.

ShawnLee
05-25-2006, 02:42 PM
A 2.1? Hahahahaha! I think my neighbors having sex would rock my room more than a 2.1!

While I feel for them since they're not used to it? Hahahahaha!

sizemic1
05-25-2006, 02:48 PM
It may have been fairly shallow, thus, making it feel more intense.

Grubbie
05-25-2006, 03:18 PM
:agree: A 2.1 seems like the equivalent of a large truck rolling by your house.
I was in El Monte for the 5.9 Whittier Narrows quake October 1987 and was thrown to the ground. :thud:
Rode out the 6.7 Northridge Quake in January 1994 in Downey so it was just a rude wake-up call.

Can't imagine getting "shook-up" over a 2.1.

Anything under 5 is really nothing. Ya you can feel a little movement but it isn't much. I have been through a couple of fivers which are fun but the 6.8 made it feel like the ground was rolling(Seattle feb 01). Seattle was lucky the 6.8 was deep or the city would of been in a lot of pain.

LPMiller
05-25-2006, 04:57 PM
it's a completely different fault line though - for them to even feel it implies a different kind of quake from what you west coasters get.

clutchy
05-25-2006, 05:17 PM
I've lived in california for almost 6 years now and i still haven't felt an earthquake...

bachviet
05-25-2006, 09:54 PM
Even a 5 won't wake me up in the middle of the night. I probably wouldn't feel a 2.1.

gwilks98
05-26-2006, 01:04 PM
it's a completely different fault line though - for them to even feel it implies a different kind of quake from what you west coasters get.

Ok, I'll raise my hand, Mr. Miller. I don't get it. How does one earth quake feel different from another? Is it due to their elevation above sea level?

sizemic1
05-26-2006, 02:18 PM
it's a completely different fault line though - for them to even feel it implies a different kind of quake from what you west coasters get.

Sorry LP..i gotta call you out on this one :)

The "feel" of an earthquake is dependant on a number of things. The primary of which is the type of soil or rock a building is built upon. Sandy soils readily transmit seismic waves causing the greatest amount of "feel" and thus damage as opposed to structures built upon hard rock which greatly reduce the "feel" and damage of surface structures. The depth at which fault stress is relieved is the second major "feel" factor.

To some extent, the type of faulting might play some role, due to their unique movements relative to surface structures, (thrust faulting being a biggie).

But all in all, it's the soil type and depth of rupture that play the biggest roles.

molecularfire
05-27-2006, 08:52 PM
A 2.1? Hahahahaha! I think my neighbors having sex would rock my room more than a 2.1!

While I feel for them since they're not used to it? Hahahahaha!
The swedes or your neighbors?