PDA

View Full Version : It's Time to Ban All Food from China



johnnymk
05-02-2007, 05:03 AM
This is truly outrageous!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/30/business/worldbusiness/30food.html?th=&emc=th&pagewanted=print

Filler in Animal Feed Is Open Secret in China


ZHANGQIU, China, April 28 — As American food safety regulators head to China to investigate how a chemical made from coal found its way into pet food that killed dogs and cats in the United States, workers in this heavily polluted northern city openly admit that the substance is routinely added to animal feed as a fake protein.

For years, producers of animal feed all over China have secretly supplemented their feed with the substance, called melamine, a cheap additive that looks like protein in tests, even though it does not provide any nutritional benefits, according to melamine scrap traders and agricultural workers here.

“Many companies buy melamine scrap to make animal feed, such as fish feed,” said Ji Denghui, general manager of the Fujian Sanming Dinghui Chemical Company, which sells melamine. “I don’t know if there’s a regulation on it. Probably not. No law or regulation says ‘don’t do it,’ so everyone’s doing it. The laws in China are like that, aren’t they? If there’s no accident, there won’t be any regulation.”

Melamine is at the center of a recall of 60 million packages of pet food, after the chemical was found in wheat gluten linked this month to the deaths of at least 16 pets in the United States.

No one knows exactly how melamine (which is not believed to be particularly toxic) became so fatal in pet food, but its presence in any form of American food is illegal.

The link to China has set off concerns among critics of the Food and Drug Administration that ingredients in pet food as well as human food, which are increasingly coming from abroad, are not being adequately screened.

“They have fewer people inspecting product at the ports than ever before,” says Caroline Smith DeWaal, the director of food safety for the Center for Science in the Public Interest in Washington. “Until China gets programs in place to verify the safety of their products, they need to be inspected by U.S. inspectors. This open-door policy on food ingredients is an open invitation for an attack on the food supply, either intentional or unintentional.”

Now, with evidence mounting that the tainted wheat gluten came from China, American regulators have been granted permission to visit the region to conduct inspections of food treatment facilities.

The Food and Drug Administration has already banned imports of wheat gluten from China after it received more than 14,000 reports of pets believed to have been sickened by packaged food. And last week, the agency opened a criminal investigation in the case and searched the offices of at least one pet food supplier.

The Department of Agriculture has also stepped in. On Thursday, the agency ordered more than 6,000 hogs to be quarantined or slaughtered after some of the pet food ingredients laced with melamine were accidentally sent to hog farms in eight states, including California.

Scientists are now trying to determine whether melamine could be harmful to humans.

The pet food case is also putting China’s agricultural exports under greater scrutiny because the country has had a terrible food safety record.

In recent years, for instance, China’s food safety scandals have involved everything from fake baby milk formulas and soy sauce made from human hair to instances where cuttlefish were soaked in calligraphy ink to improve their color and eels were fed contraceptive pills to make them grow long and slim.

For its part, Chinese officials dispute any suggestion that melamine from the country could have killed pets. But regulators here on Friday banned the use of melamine in vegetable proteins made for export or for use in domestic food supplies.

Yet what is clear from visiting this region of northeast China is that for years melamine has been quietly mixed into Chinese animal feed and then sold to unsuspecting farmers as protein-rich pig, poultry and fish feed.

Many animal feed operators here advertise on the Internet, seeking to purchase melamine scrap. The Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Company, one of the companies that American regulators named as having shipped melamine-tainted wheat gluten to the United States, had posted such a notice on the Internet last March.

Here at the Shandong Mingshui Great Chemical Group factory, huge boiler vats are turning coal into melamine, which is then used to create plastics and fertilizer.

But the leftover melamine scrap, golf ball-size chunks of white rock, is sometimes being sold to local agricultural entrepreneurs, who say they mix a powdered form of the scrap into animal feed to deceive those who raise animals into thinking they are buying feed that is high in protein.

“It just saves money if you add melamine scrap,” said the manager of an animal feed factory here.

Last Friday here in Zhangqiu, a fast-growing industrial city southeast of Beijing, two animal feed producers explained in great detail how they purchase low-grade wheat, corn, soybean or other proteins and then mix in small portions of nitrogen-rich melamine scrap, whose chemical properties help the feed register an inflated protein level.

Melamine is the new scam of choice, they say, because urea — another nitrogen-rich chemical — is illegal for use in pig and poultry feed and can be easily detected in China as well as in the United States.

“People use melamine scrap to boost nitrogen levels for the tests,” said the manager of the animal feed factory. “If you add it in small quantities, it won’t hurt the animals.”

The manager, who works at a small animal feed operation here that consists of a handful of storage and mixing areas, said he has mixed melamine scrap into animal feed for years.

He said he was not currently using melamine. But he then pulled out a plastic bag containing what he said was melamine powder and said he could dye it any color to match the right feed stock.

He said that melamine used in pet food would probably not be harmful. “Pets are not like pigs or chickens,” he said casually, explaining that they can afford to eat less protein. “They don’t need to grow fast.”

The resulting melamine-tainted feed would be weak in protein, he acknowledged, which means the feed is less nutritious.

But, by using the melamine additive, the feed seller makes a heftier profit because melamine scrap is much cheaper than soy, wheat or corn protein.

“It’s true you can make a lot more profit by putting melamine in,” said another animal feed seller here in Zhangqiu. “Melamine will cost you about $1.20 for each protein count per ton whereas real protein costs you about $6, so you can see the difference.”

Feed producers who use melamine here say the tainted feed is often shipped to feed mills in the Yangtze River Delta, near Shanghai, or down to Guangdong Province, near Hong Kong. They also said they knew that some melamine-laced feed had been exported to other parts of Asia, including South Korea, North Korea, Indonesia and Thailand.

Evidence is mounting that Chinese protein exports have been tainted with melamine and that its use in agricultural regions like this one is widespread. But the government has issued no recall of any food or feed product here in China.

Indeed, few people outside the agriculture business know about the use of melamine scrap. The Chinese news media — which is strictly censored — has not reported much about the country’s ties to the pet food recall in the United States. And few in agriculture here do not see any harm in using melamine in small doses; they simply see it as cheating a little on protein, not harming animals or pets.

As for the sale of melamine scrap, it is increasingly popular as a fake ingredient in feed, traders and workers here say.

At the Hebei Haixing Insect Net Factory in nearby Hebei Province, which makes animal feed, a manager named Guo Qingyin said: “In the past melamine scrap was free, but the price has been going up in the past few years. Consumption of melamine scrap is probably bigger than that of urea in the animal feed industry now.”

And so melamine producers like the ones here in Zhangqiu are busy.

A man named Jing, who works in the sales department at the Shandong Mingshui Great Chemical Group factory here, said on Friday that prices have been rising, but he said that he had no idea how the company’s melamine scrap is used.

“We have an auction for melamine scrap every three months,” he said. “I haven’t heard of it being added to animal feed. It’s not for animal feed.”

oblongmelon
05-02-2007, 07:31 AM
Geez...something should be done about this. RIGHT AWAY.

Markel
05-02-2007, 07:54 AM
NEWS FLASH!

New York, May 2, 2007 8:31am In an unprecedented event on the Got|Apex? forums (http://www.gotapex.com/forums.php), johnnymk and oblongmelon were found to be in agreement. Stay tuned for further developments.

InfiniteNothing
05-02-2007, 08:48 AM
Why don't we just get our wheat gluten from US farmers? Are we really so cheap as to chase that last $0.04/lb

johnnymk
05-02-2007, 09:31 AM
NEWS FLASH!

New York, May 2, 2007 8:31am In an unprecedented event on the Got|Apex? forums (http://www.gotapex.com/forums.php), johnnymk and oblongmelon were found to be in agreement. Stay tuned for further developments.

lol

ray
05-02-2007, 09:33 AM
Why don't we just get our wheat gluten from US farmers? Are we really so cheap as to chase that last $0.04/lb

Most US corporations ARE that cheap. It's all about shareholder profitability.

VTGreg
05-02-2007, 11:09 AM
Most US corporations ARE that cheap. It's all about shareholder profitability.

$0.04/lb adds up when you are purchasing the amounts that these companies purchase. For every 25 lbs you purchase, you are saving a dollar. That's not a small amount of savings.

InfiniteNothing
05-02-2007, 12:37 PM
Well, first, I don't think you read what Ray said. He was saying that Amercian wheat gluten was competitively priced.

Second, I think saving a dollar here and there isn't worth killing your pet. Plus, buying domestic products will help balance the trade deficit.

Napoleon54
05-02-2007, 12:58 PM
Second, I think saving a dollar here and there isn't worth killing your pet. Plus, buying domestic products will help balance the trade deficit.

With the recent melamine controversy, I'm sure pet food manufacturers will be much more aware of where their ingredients come from and pay closer attention to quality control.

Private companies don't care much about the trade deficit. All other things being equal (quality, etc), they'll buy from where ever is cheaper. That's what "free trade" (ex. NAFTA) is all about.

ray
05-02-2007, 04:47 PM
Second, I think saving a dollar here and there isn't worth killing your pet. Plus, buying domestic products will help balance the trade deficit.

I agree that saving a few bucks isn't worth killing your pet or anybody else's for that matter, but most of the manufacturers will still go for the cheapest provider of raw materials, whether it's in China or here in the US.

It's like that scene from "Armageddon" when Steve Buscemi says "You know, Harry, we're sitting on 4 million pounds of fuel, one nuclear weapon, and a thing that has 270,000 moving parts built by the lowest bidder. Makes you feel good, doesn't it?"

oblongmelon
05-02-2007, 06:22 PM
NEWS FLASH!

New York, May 2, 2007 8:31am In an unprecedented event on the Got|Apex? forums (http://www.gotapex.com/forums.php), johnnymk and oblongmelon were found to be in agreement. Stay tuned for further developments.

oh brother..:rolleyes:

johnnymk
05-18-2007, 07:53 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/18/business/worldbusiness/18trade.html?th=&emc=th&pagewanted=print

SHANGHAI, May 17 — Weeks after tainted Chinese pet food ingredients killed and sickened thousands of dogs and cats in the United States, this country is facing growing international pressure to prove that its food exports are safe to eat.

But simmering beneath the surface is a thornier problem that worries Chinese officials: how to assure the world that this is not a nation of counterfeits and that “Made in China” means well made.

Already, the contamination has produced one of the largest pet food recalls in American history, heightening global fears about the quality and safety of China’s agricultural products. And evidence has also shown that China exported fake drug ingredients, threatening to undermine the credibility of another booming export.

“This isn’t an international crisis yet, but if they don’t do something about it quickly, it will be,” said David Zweig, a China specialist who teaches at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. “The question is whether it spills over and ‘Made in China’ becomes known as ‘Buyer Beware.’ ”

With contamination known to have spread to feed for livestock and fish, some of America’s biggest food companies, like Kraft Foods, are lobbying the United States government to press China to improve its food safety measures.

Kraft, Kellogg and other food companies have said they are reviewing their food safety procedures and upgrading equipment. These executives worry that another scare involving China could set off a consumer backlash against Chinese or foreign imports and reverse a trend that has made large food makers increasingly dependent on processed ingredients from developing countries.

Experts also say doubts about the quality of China’s food shipments and worries about its fake drugs could affect other exports if buyers begin to find safety problems or other product flaws.

Indeed, the frequency of recalls of Chinese imports has risen in recent years, according to the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

For instance, two weeks ago, Wal-Mart Stores announced a nationwide recall of baby bibs made in China after some of those bibs tested positive for high levels of lead.

Just this week, the Cardinal Distributing Company recalled 300,000 children’s rings with dice or horseshoes, and Spandrel Sales and Marketing recalled about 200,000 necklaces, bracelets and rings. In both cases, the jewelry, which was made in China and sold in American vending machines, had high levels of lead.

Many consumers have also told pet food makers that they want goods that are free of any ingredients from China, according to the Pet Food Institute.

At stake for China is more than $30 billion a year in agricultural and drug exports to Asia, Europe and North America. For multinationals, not to mention the smaller American importers, the stakes are much higher.

The current scare may prompt changes in China. The former head of the nation’s food and drug safety watchdog is now on trial in Beijing, accused of accepting bribes and failing to curb the growing market in fake and dangerous medicines.

Still, few trade experts believe that China’s export boom is going to slow anytime soon. China’s shipments of vegetables and seafood have been soaring in recent years. And many importers say they would rather work with Chinese companies to raise safety levels than switch suppliers. China is also negotiating with the United States and the European Union to have them accept Chinese poultry products. That move is opposed by American and European poultry farmers, who are using the pet food scandal to press their case.

“If you bring chicken in here from China, you don’t know what that chicken ate, and I think that’s dangerous,” said Lucius Adkins, president of the United Poultry Growers Association.

Indeed, certain industries will face greater challenges, starting with feed processing, where two Chinese companies were found to have intentionally mixed an industrial chemical called melamine with wheat flour to heighten protein readings artificially.

Pharmaceuticals need to overcome even higher hurdles, particularly since last year when 100 people died in Panama after ingesting fake ingredients used in cough syrup.

“We’re now learning some of the dirty secrets behind this fast-growing economy,” said Wang Fei-ling, a professor of international affairs at the Georgia Institute of Technology. “And the dirty secret is they’re cutting corners in making things.”

In some places around the world, reaction has been swift. In Europe, food safety authorities are testing all Chinese protein imports for melamine. In South Korea, the CJ Corporation, one of the country’s largest food and feed makers, said last week that it was recalling 42 tons of wheat gluten from China even though the products had not tested positive for melamine.

“The major effect of this seems to me that the Chinese have been alerted that they should get their house in order,” says Dr. M. D. Merbis, an economist at the Center for World Food Studies in Amsterdam.

Some Chinese exports are feeling the pinch.

“A Spanish company came to visit us and was planning to buy our product,” said Sun Hong, chief executive of the Sanfu Biochemical Company, a rice protein maker in Hangzhou.

“We were going to strike a deal at the end of the month. But after what happened in the U.S. they haven’t even replied to our e-mail yet.”

Experts say that to restore confidence, China needs to confront the issue and not be seen as covering up or delaying the release of information, which seemed to be the case during recent outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, and bird flu.

In similar fashion, after the initial news about melamine came out, China denied having shipped any wheat gluten to the United States and one official said melamine could not have harmed pets.

Only after an international storm surrounded the case in mid-April, and Senator Dick Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, publicly rebuked China for its response to the investigation did China fully cooperate with American regulators.

Now, in a turnabout, China has banned melamine from food and feed proteins and announced nationwide inspections.

“You have to realize,” said Professor Wenran Jiang at the University of Alberta, “China is going through a radical transformation and it’s hard to manage. The state just doesn’t have the expertise to keep up with these things.”

The problems here are compounded by strict controls over the media that keep the public in the dark about food and drug safety violations, experts say.

Most Chinese are still unaware of the pet food scandal in the United States because the story has largely been ignored by the Chinese news media. Several Chinese editors contacted in recent weeks said they were ordered by the government propaganda department not to report on the case.

“This has been a key,” says Steve Tsang, who teaches at Oxford. “The government has the ability to censor and manage the flow of the news.”

Hoping to investigate why melamine contaminated so much pet food, investigators from the Food and Drug Administration spent two weeks in China this month. They said the Chinese government was cooperative.

But last week F.D.A. officials acknowledged that agency investigators had no opportunity to carry out their own work here. The Chinese government had already done it.

“We visited the two facilities but there’s essentially nothing to be found in that they are currently closed down, not operating,” Walter Batts, an F.D.A. official, said during a recent news conference.

United States investigators were not allowed to interview the managers of the Chinese pet feed companies accused of violations, even though they were being held in detention centers.

After United States investigators left, China issued a statement asking the United States not to punish other exporters of food ingredients for the misdeeds of a few rogue companies, and not to let this become a trade quarrel.

Experts say China would like to close the door on the episode. And so would America’s biggest food companies like Kraft, which is supporting an organization that is pushing to strengthen the F.D.A.

In a statement issued this week, Kraft Foods said, “We’re also lending our support to the Coalition for a Stronger F.D.A. and industry colleagues in urging Congress for substantial funding increases to the F.D.A. for the agency’s food oversight functions.”

But many experts say the real challenge lies in China — in ensuring that its aggressive entrepreneurs are tamed and that its inspectors can better monitor the contents of exports now valued at more than $1 trillion a year.

If they cannot, some analysts say there could be a shift in consumer attitudes toward products “Made in China.”

“This kind of thing is like leaves settling on the forest floor,” said Robert A. Kapp, a longtime China specialist and former president of the U.S.-China Business Council. “They gradually accumulate and change one’s impression over time.”

F.D.A. Says Fish Are Untainted

Farmed fish that may have eaten food with imported Chinese ingredients show no traces of contamination and should be safe to eat, the Food and Drug Administration said yesterday.

The two fish farms that used the feed kept their fish off the market until the tests could be completed.

Dr. David W. K. Acheson, assistant commissioner for food protection, said fish being raised at Kona Blue in Hawaii and American Gold Seafoods in Washington State tested negative for the chemical melamine.

The questionable feed was also sold to 196 fish hatcheries. Because those fish are small and the feed has been recalled, Dr. Acheson said the F.D.A. believed that there was no longer any public health concern.

On Tuesday, the F.D.A. cleared for market 56,000 pigs given feed that included scraps of pet food contaminated with melamine.

Jeffbx
05-21-2007, 05:19 AM
Although this could lead to higher prices, I think it could also be very good for local (US) manufacturers & farmers - maybe we can all get past the Wal-Mart "cheapest at all costs" mentality that we seem to be stuck in.

Markel
05-21-2007, 07:39 AM
"It's Time to Ban All Food from China"
Do you know how many restaurants this would put out of business!!!???!


;)

bachviet
05-21-2007, 08:28 AM
In related news, Robert Kraft now has more $$$ to sign free agents for his NE Patriots. :P

DarkFury
05-21-2007, 10:05 AM
"It's Time to Ban All Food from China"
Do you know how many restaurants this would put out of business!!!???!


;)
OH NOES!!!! :eek:

I must have my General Tso's Chicken, my Seasame Chicken, my Chicken Lo Mein, and my Crab Rangoons!!!!!


Don't even play like that... :2far:

gwilks98
05-21-2007, 11:08 AM
Maybe I'm the only one. I think the media blew this one way out of proportion. Yes, there were 14000 reports, but many of which lacked any sound evidence that the food was to blame. People heard about the hype, their pet got sick and automatically blamed the food. Maybe your dumbass dog ate some mulch in the back yard (like mine did.)
This is the first time something like this happened. They never really publicly confirmed that it was the melamine that was toxic: it's just the suspect because they couldn't find anything else.

I'm all for pet safety, but I don't really agree with bandwagon regulation based on FUD.