PDA

View Full Version : BCS warns playoff system threat to bowl games



zippyjuan
05-01-2009, 10:58 AM
I have no problem with members of Congress expressing their own personal opinion on the way college football conducts their post- season schedule and games but I do not think they should be trying to legislate what the BCS should or should not do. Could it be improved- probably but a federal law is not the way to go about it.
http://my.earthlink.net/article/top?guid=20090501/49fa73c0_3ca6_1552620090501-1389728019

BCS warns playoff system threat to bowl games
By FREDERIC J. FROMMER (Associated Press Writer)
From Associated Press
May 01, 2009 12:29 PM EDT
WASHINGTON - Tackling an issue sure to rouse sports fans, lawmakers pressed college football officials Friday on switching the Bowl Championship Series to a playoff, with one Texas Republican calling the current system as unworkable as communism and joking it should be labeled "BS," not "BCS."

John Swofford, the coordinator of the BCS, rejected the idea of switching to a playoff, arguing it would threaten the existence of celebrated bowl games. Sponsorships and TV revenue that now go to bowl games would instead be spent on playoff games, "meaning that it will be very difficult for any bowl, including the current BCS bowls, which are among the oldest and most established in the game's history, to survive," Swofford said.

Rep. Joe Barton of Texas, who has introduced legislation that would prevent the NCAA from labeling a game a national championship unless it's the outcome of a playoff system, said that efforts to tinker with the BCS were bound to fail.

"It's like communism," he said at the House Energy and Commerce Committee's commerce, trade and consumer protection subcommittee hearing. "You can't fix it."

Barton, the top Republican on the committee, quipped that the BCS should drop the "C" from its name because it doesn't represent a true championship.

"Call it the 'BS' system," he said to laughter.

Under the BCS, some conferences get automatic bids to participate while others do not. Conferences that get an automatic bid - the ACC, Big East, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-10 and SEC - get about $18 million each, far more than the non-conference schools. Swofford is also commissioner of the ACC.

"How is this fair?" asked the subcommittee chairman, Democratic Rep. Bobby Rush of Illinois, who has co-sponsored Barton's bill. "How can we justify this system ... are the big guys getting together and shutting out the little guys?"

"I think it is fair, because it represents the marketplace," Swofford responded.

Craig Thompson, commissioner of the Mountain West Commission, which does not get an automatic bid, called the money distribution system "grossly inequitable."

The MWC has proposed a playoff system and hired a Washington firm to lobby Congress for changes to the BCS, which currently features a championship game between the two top teams in the BCS standings, based on two polls and six computer ratings.

The MWC proposes, among others things, scrapping the BCS standings and creating a 12-member committee to pick which teams receive at-large bids, and to select and seed the eight teams chosen for the playoff. The BCS has previously discussed, and dismissed, the idea of using a selection committee.

The four current BCS games - the Sugar, Orange, Rose and Fiesta bowls - would host the four first-round playoff games under the proposal. Thompson has argued that a playoff system would be a boon for those bowls, because they would help determine the national champion.

Gene Bleymaier, athletic director at Boise State University, noted that his school's football team went undefeated several times, yet never got a chance to play for the national championship under the BCS.

"The BCS system not only restricts access but essentially precludes schools from playing in the national championship," he said.

Asked by Rush whether Congress should intervene, Bleymaier responded, "The only way this is going to change is with help from the outside."

The BCS is in its final season of a four-year deal with the Fox network. A new four-year deal with ESPN, worth $125 million per year, begins with the 2011 bowl games. That deal was negotiated using the current BCS format. While ESPN has said it would not stand in the way if the BCS wanted to change, the new deal allows the BCS to put off making major changes until the 2014 season.

The hearing, with the appealing combination of sports and politics, attracted considerable attention on a relatively quiet day on Capitol Hill. The subject also is a boon to lawmakers, who have some constituents still seething because their team was passed over. Last year, Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania made headlines when he questioned the NFL's destruction of tapes in the Spygate case. The league disciplined the New England Patriots for videotaping signals from the New York Jets' sideline during a game.

The BCS has come under attack from several politicians. Last November, as president-elect, Barack Obama told "60 Minutes" he would prefer an eight-team playoff system.

"I don't know any serious fan of college football who has disagreed with me on this," he said. "So I'm going to throw my weight around a little bit."

In the Senate, Utah Republican Orrin Hatch has put the BCS on the agenda for the Judiciary's antitrust subcommittee this year, and Utah's attorney general, Mark Shurtleff, is investigating whether the BCS violates federal antitrust laws.

Fans were furious that Utah was bypassed for the national championship despite going undefeated in the regular season. The title game pitted No. 1 Florida (12-1) against No. 2 Oklahoma (12-1); Florida won 24-14 and claimed the title.

Maarchk
05-01-2009, 02:22 PM
I think that it is correct that a 'Champion' is a misnomer. And I think that frustrates people. it also helps raise a lot of money because having 64 bowl games gets everyone more money.

The sucky part is that the little teams never have a chance to get to the big bowls and as a result their school will never see the money that they hope to get.

I couldn't agree that a law should force playoffs, but it seems fishy that you can fix who is in the playoffs and therefore how much money they get.

But with college you kind of lose because you have too many teams to get a fair standings of having everyone play themselves..

I think if anything the little colleges should sue the big colleges for fair money. Not that i know what that is.

VTGreg
05-01-2009, 06:53 PM
With everything going on in the world today Congress thought it was a good idea to have a hearing on the merits of the BCS? Seriously, should we just get rid of everyone now or do we need to wait another 2/6 years?

Thesifer
05-01-2009, 09:28 PM
Especially with this scary scary h1n1 flu sweeping through :rolleyes:

On the topic of the BCS: They can keep the bowls with a playoff.. there's nothing saying they can't. Just like NCAA Basketball has the NIT Tournament to milk more money..

ufcrusher
05-01-2009, 10:24 PM
Its amazing to me that you have schools which claim to go undefeated but dont play any real games. I dont think that anyone would say that high school football and the NFL were playing at the same caliber. Nor do I think that anyone would say that a divison Ia school was the same as a division III school. So why do these schools that might be the biggest fish in their little pond think they can swim in the ocean with the sharks. This is exactly what these people are claiming. Oh, my team was undefeated...we beat Masta Bater U; Fwapping U; and Frack U, therefore we are the kings of the world.

I think the solution is simple - if any of these teams really thinks they have what it takes they should have to put up or shut up. If they win, they get the title. If they lose, their football program is disbanded forever and the idiot congrssman who stood up for them should be flogged with metal razor wires. Ok, so maybe its a bit much but this crap has pissed me off for years.

VTGreg
05-02-2009, 03:32 AM
Its amazing to me that you have schools which claim to go undefeated but dont play any real games. I dont think that anyone would say that high school football and the NFL were playing at the same caliber. Nor do I think that anyone would say that a divison Ia school was the same as a division III school. So why do these schools that might be the biggest fish in their little pond think they can swim in the ocean with the sharks. This is exactly what these people are claiming. Oh, my team was undefeated...we beat Masta Bater U; Fwapping U; and Frack U, therefore we are the kings of the world.

I think the solution is simple - if any of these teams really thinks they have what it takes they should have to put up or shut up. If they win, they get the title. If they lose, their football program is disbanded forever and the idiot congrssman who stood up for them should be flogged with metal razor wires. Ok, so maybe its a bit much but this crap has pissed me off for years.

LOL. You do have to give them some slack because scheduling in college football can be tough. Take Utah for example, they played at Michigan this year and won. Who would have thought when that game was scheduled that Michigan would be a sub-.500 team.

I'm just worried about what a playoff system would do to the regular season. Add to that the fact that a playoff only crowns the hottest team victorious and I'm not a huge fan. Before long we will have college kids playing NFL like schedules.

zippyjuan
05-02-2009, 05:24 PM
The bowl system is all about tons of money- both for the NCAA and the pariticipating schools. A team which goes to a bowl game also shares some of their revenue with the other schools in their conference so if your conference gets good bowl games the whole conference benefits. If small schools are kept out, they cannot share in the revenues they could use to try to improve their programs. The schools that win most often are also the schools with the most money.

Do they actually call it the "National Championship" and the "National champion team"? More often I seem to recall the game and winner being called the BCS Championship and the BCS Champions. Not letting them call the winner "National Champions" is just semantics and does not change anything.

There have been proposals for a "mini playoff" within the BCS Bowl structure- put the top four teams into two bowl games and have the winners play one more game for the Champion.