TheLoneGunman
06-24-2001, 09:49 AM
This is not a political rant so likely no one will answer :-)
In traditional sports betting you can bet either side (ex. Lakers vs 76'ers and you can bet on either team and the point spread [or other factors] level out the teams).
However, in individual sports and certain types of wagers there appears to be only 1 side. (Ex. 100 -to- 1 that Tiger Woods will double bogey 5 different holes in 1 round or 1500:1 that Anna Kournikova will win Wimbeldon).
What I wanted to do was bet WITH the house. Therefore, I believe that Tiger will NOT double bogey and therefore I will lay down $100 to win $1 rather than laying down $1 to win $100 if he does do poorly.
How do I make this bet?
Isn't this an easy way of making money? (i.e. occasionally dark horses do ok at tournaments, but they still don't win them. I am referring to the 100:1 guys not the 3:1 guys that do have a chance)
In traditional sports betting you can bet either side (ex. Lakers vs 76'ers and you can bet on either team and the point spread [or other factors] level out the teams).
However, in individual sports and certain types of wagers there appears to be only 1 side. (Ex. 100 -to- 1 that Tiger Woods will double bogey 5 different holes in 1 round or 1500:1 that Anna Kournikova will win Wimbeldon).
What I wanted to do was bet WITH the house. Therefore, I believe that Tiger will NOT double bogey and therefore I will lay down $100 to win $1 rather than laying down $1 to win $100 if he does do poorly.
How do I make this bet?
Isn't this an easy way of making money? (i.e. occasionally dark horses do ok at tournaments, but they still don't win them. I am referring to the 100:1 guys not the 3:1 guys that do have a chance)