OC
10-27-2001, 12:40 PM
Y2J and I got into it about us bombing the Taliban - he's completely against it. We went back and forth for a bit. He suggested that our conversation be posted in the forums, so here it is. Read it and tell us what you think.
<Y2J> I hope we stop fighting in afghanistan soon
<Y2J> its such a mistake
<overclocked> what, we should just let them attack us and get away with it?
<Y2J> no
<overclocked> what would you have us do then?
<Y2J> but us attacking them is going to make them angrier
<Y2J> terrorists have lived in america for years
<Y2J> bombing afghan. and iraq wont solve anything
<overclocked> right - hence the current problem
<overclocked> i repeat - what would you have us do then?
<Y2J> First Bush has to acknowledge the mistakes out gov't has made in foreign policy, then he has to stop all interaction with other countries (embargos, military, etc)
<Y2J> we have to stop using military muscle
<Y2J> will it lead to peace? nobody knows, but bombing the **** out of afghan. will undoubtedly lead to more american deaths
<Y2J> We have only two choices — death or peace. It's unfortunate that it will take far more courage to choose peace.
<overclocked> Pacifism in the face of a brutal attacker will only get you killed
<overclocked> you said "stop using military muscle"
<Y2J> chances are if we change our foreign policy to a hands-off one, it will not
<overclocked> this means we could never retaliate
<overclocked> Should the US have responded to the attack on Pearl Harbor?
<Y2J> there is no specific enemy to retaliate against. we are just bombing afghanistan, angering them more. Pearl Harbor was a different situation, it was a conventional war. this is not. the enemy is hidden all over, and one person can unleash immesurable acts of violence
<overclocked> Right, but we do have targets that belong to the organization that attacked us
<overclocked> everything you've said suggests that we should just let them get away with what they did
<Y2J> belonged, theyve long left building that may be targets of attack
<Y2J> I think we have to change our policy, or thousands more americans may die
<Y2J> revenge is not necessary, but saving americans lives is
<overclocked> this IS the change in our policy
<overclocked> we've igniored the thrat of terrorism for far too long
<overclocked> and look where it got us
<Y2J> no its not. we have to make it hands-off. ignored? oh no. we've been threatened many times before, just never taken it seriously. If we just stop santioning what other countries can and cannot do, there will be no anger against us
<overclocked> so again you say we should do nothing to retaliate
<Y2J> The only positive of bombing is it will satisfy the understandable lust for vengeance that so many Americans feel right now.
<overclocked> nonsense
<Y2J> That is correct
<overclocked> if i came up to you and knocked you on your ass, would you just say "Sorry I got in your way" or would you want to hit me back?
<Y2J> if we continue the attack, there will be more terrorist attacks, correct?
<overclocked> there will be more terrorist attacks PERIOD
<Y2J> Our gov't will escalate the attacks then, as will the terrorists. and with every Escalation, more will dier
<overclocked> terrorism dates back thousands of years
<Y2J> This cannot go on
<Y2J> Bush has to acknowledge the gov'ts mistakes in foreign policy and change the,m
<overclocked> like what "mistakes"?
<Y2J> Our gov't uses "foreign aid" and military muscle to impose its way upon the rest of the world.
<Y2J> thats why we are hated
<Y2J> we are also loved for making cheap food and medication
<Y2J> we must focus on the positives here
<Y2J> and stop imposing our will on others
<overclocked> cheap medication? tell that to people on Medicare
<overclocked> that have to choose between eating and medicine
<Y2J> cheap food...and medication (we develop medication) is what I meant
<overclocked> so we should pull back to our own borders and ignore the rest of the world?
<Y2J> We have to get the fantasy out of our minds: that by killing foreigners we will bring peace
<overclocked> That's what the Taliban were thinking
<overclocked> when they destroyed the WTC
<Y2J> no, they want war
<Y2J> they dont want peace
<overclocked> you're right, they don't want peace
<Y2J> they want the american scum gone from the earth
<overclocked> that is exactly the point
<overclocked> they don't want peace
<Y2J> well, we have to focus on protecteing ourselves now
<Y2J> and not worry about the damn afghanis
<overclocked> you seem to share their point of view in a way
<overclocked> they hate all americans, not just our government
<Y2J> how is that?
<Y2J> I know, but they hate us because of our government
<overclocked> we are NOT bombing the afghani people, we are bombing their government
<overclocked> we do not hate the afghani people
<overclocked> but we need to knock their governemt on their ass
<overclocked> that's a BIG difference
<Y2J> but then they will retaliate, then we wil again...
<Y2J> how will it end without deaths?
<Y2J> It CANNOT
<Y2J> thats my point
<overclocked> you're right
<overclocked> there will be more deaths
<Y2J> deaths which I prefer to avoid in the name of peace
<overclocked> you don't seem to get it
<overclocked> there will be more attacks against the US if we sit on our ass and do nothing
<overclocked> there will be more attacks PERIOD
<overclocked> do you see that?
<Y2J> No, thats not the case. If we make good on a new foreign policy
<overclocked> but, if we can take away some of their ability to commit acts of terrorism against ANYONE, then I say we do it
<Y2J> then the anger will dissipate from the arab world
<overclocked> bullies are never appeased by capitulation
<Y2J> but we have to understand why are they bullies?
<overclocked> eventually they want to pick a fight again
<Y2J> because america has sanctions against their countries
<overclocked> it doens
<overclocked> it doesn't matter why they are bullies
<overclocked> they've attacked us and they need to pay the price
<overclocked> it is THEY who attacked US
<Y2J> but there are reasons why they did
<overclocked> it is THEY who forsaked the power of words
<overclocked> THEY made NO ATTEMPT to "talk" to us
<overclocked> they just bombed us
<overclocked> at least in the Middle East they TRY to talk once in a while
<Y2J> I know, I feel the same hatred, but I dont see any positives coming out of bombing them
<overclocked> the positive is that we get them on the run so they can't organize any more attacks
<overclocked> if we leave them alone, they'll take that as a victory
<Y2J> that attack was planned for years, Im sure they have more people in America ready to unleash horror
<overclocked> they'll take that victory and try to build on it
<Y2J> we will never find them all
<Y2J> its an impossible war to win
<overclocked> we'll certainly never find them all if we just pull back and do nothing
<overclocked> like you're suggesting
<Y2J> either way we wont
<Y2J> might as well make peace
<overclocked> IT WILL NOT LEAD TO PEACE YOU IDIOT!!!!
<Y2J> theres a chance it will
<Y2J> theres no chance bombing will
<overclocked> bull****
<overclocked> if we just pull away and do nothing to retaliate, they will take that as a victory and perform more attacks
<Y2J> so we agree to disagree
<Y2J> no, if we pull out, they will lose their hatred
<overclocked> nonsense
<overclocked> look
<overclocked> if a bully knocks you down and you do nothing he'll knock you down again again
<overclocked> and again and again
<Y2J> why do they hate us? becauwe we stick our nose in others business...Kuwait, iraq, iran, etc
<Y2J> WE ARE THE BULLY
<overclocked> you're an idiot
<overclocked> if you don't like it here in the US then go help the Taliban
<overclocked> you seem to be on their side anyway
<Y2J> theres too much anger in our country, but we have to look at our mistakes too
<Y2J> its hard for Bush to do that
<overclocked> No, the anger is coming from the Taliban, not us
<Y2J> Just to clear up your view, you agree bombing will lead to retaliation by them, and mroe by us..What will that accomplish?
<overclocked> the outcome will be fewer attacks against us - that's the whole point of war
<overclocked> you know what? Terrorism doesn't work
<overclocked> it has NEVER been used successfully to win an arguement
<Y2J> fewer attacks? how can that be if you anger them further? There are terrorists in all countries, in many organziations, not just the Taliban, terrorism will not die from this.
<overclocked> rolling over and doing nothing will be sending a message to the entire world that we can be beaten by a single attack
<overclocked> can you image what Iraq would do with that?
<overclocked> Or Syria
<Y2J> beaten? no, we will take it as a wake up call. we have to focus on protecting the country better, not worrying about others
<Y2J> ucla game is starting, we should post this conversation on G|A and see what others think
<overclocked> ok - define "protecting our country"
<Y2J> protecting our country -- Keeping the home front safe, developing vaccines in case of bioterorism, educating people, etc.
<Y2J> ok, Im out, if you want to post this, go ahead
<Y2J> good arguing with ya
<Y2J> I hope we stop fighting in afghanistan soon
<Y2J> its such a mistake
<overclocked> what, we should just let them attack us and get away with it?
<Y2J> no
<overclocked> what would you have us do then?
<Y2J> but us attacking them is going to make them angrier
<Y2J> terrorists have lived in america for years
<Y2J> bombing afghan. and iraq wont solve anything
<overclocked> right - hence the current problem
<overclocked> i repeat - what would you have us do then?
<Y2J> First Bush has to acknowledge the mistakes out gov't has made in foreign policy, then he has to stop all interaction with other countries (embargos, military, etc)
<Y2J> we have to stop using military muscle
<Y2J> will it lead to peace? nobody knows, but bombing the **** out of afghan. will undoubtedly lead to more american deaths
<Y2J> We have only two choices — death or peace. It's unfortunate that it will take far more courage to choose peace.
<overclocked> Pacifism in the face of a brutal attacker will only get you killed
<overclocked> you said "stop using military muscle"
<Y2J> chances are if we change our foreign policy to a hands-off one, it will not
<overclocked> this means we could never retaliate
<overclocked> Should the US have responded to the attack on Pearl Harbor?
<Y2J> there is no specific enemy to retaliate against. we are just bombing afghanistan, angering them more. Pearl Harbor was a different situation, it was a conventional war. this is not. the enemy is hidden all over, and one person can unleash immesurable acts of violence
<overclocked> Right, but we do have targets that belong to the organization that attacked us
<overclocked> everything you've said suggests that we should just let them get away with what they did
<Y2J> belonged, theyve long left building that may be targets of attack
<Y2J> I think we have to change our policy, or thousands more americans may die
<Y2J> revenge is not necessary, but saving americans lives is
<overclocked> this IS the change in our policy
<overclocked> we've igniored the thrat of terrorism for far too long
<overclocked> and look where it got us
<Y2J> no its not. we have to make it hands-off. ignored? oh no. we've been threatened many times before, just never taken it seriously. If we just stop santioning what other countries can and cannot do, there will be no anger against us
<overclocked> so again you say we should do nothing to retaliate
<Y2J> The only positive of bombing is it will satisfy the understandable lust for vengeance that so many Americans feel right now.
<overclocked> nonsense
<Y2J> That is correct
<overclocked> if i came up to you and knocked you on your ass, would you just say "Sorry I got in your way" or would you want to hit me back?
<Y2J> if we continue the attack, there will be more terrorist attacks, correct?
<overclocked> there will be more terrorist attacks PERIOD
<Y2J> Our gov't will escalate the attacks then, as will the terrorists. and with every Escalation, more will dier
<overclocked> terrorism dates back thousands of years
<Y2J> This cannot go on
<Y2J> Bush has to acknowledge the gov'ts mistakes in foreign policy and change the,m
<overclocked> like what "mistakes"?
<Y2J> Our gov't uses "foreign aid" and military muscle to impose its way upon the rest of the world.
<Y2J> thats why we are hated
<Y2J> we are also loved for making cheap food and medication
<Y2J> we must focus on the positives here
<Y2J> and stop imposing our will on others
<overclocked> cheap medication? tell that to people on Medicare
<overclocked> that have to choose between eating and medicine
<Y2J> cheap food...and medication (we develop medication) is what I meant
<overclocked> so we should pull back to our own borders and ignore the rest of the world?
<Y2J> We have to get the fantasy out of our minds: that by killing foreigners we will bring peace
<overclocked> That's what the Taliban were thinking
<overclocked> when they destroyed the WTC
<Y2J> no, they want war
<Y2J> they dont want peace
<overclocked> you're right, they don't want peace
<Y2J> they want the american scum gone from the earth
<overclocked> that is exactly the point
<overclocked> they don't want peace
<Y2J> well, we have to focus on protecteing ourselves now
<Y2J> and not worry about the damn afghanis
<overclocked> you seem to share their point of view in a way
<overclocked> they hate all americans, not just our government
<Y2J> how is that?
<Y2J> I know, but they hate us because of our government
<overclocked> we are NOT bombing the afghani people, we are bombing their government
<overclocked> we do not hate the afghani people
<overclocked> but we need to knock their governemt on their ass
<overclocked> that's a BIG difference
<Y2J> but then they will retaliate, then we wil again...
<Y2J> how will it end without deaths?
<Y2J> It CANNOT
<Y2J> thats my point
<overclocked> you're right
<overclocked> there will be more deaths
<Y2J> deaths which I prefer to avoid in the name of peace
<overclocked> you don't seem to get it
<overclocked> there will be more attacks against the US if we sit on our ass and do nothing
<overclocked> there will be more attacks PERIOD
<overclocked> do you see that?
<Y2J> No, thats not the case. If we make good on a new foreign policy
<overclocked> but, if we can take away some of their ability to commit acts of terrorism against ANYONE, then I say we do it
<Y2J> then the anger will dissipate from the arab world
<overclocked> bullies are never appeased by capitulation
<Y2J> but we have to understand why are they bullies?
<overclocked> eventually they want to pick a fight again
<Y2J> because america has sanctions against their countries
<overclocked> it doens
<overclocked> it doesn't matter why they are bullies
<overclocked> they've attacked us and they need to pay the price
<overclocked> it is THEY who attacked US
<Y2J> but there are reasons why they did
<overclocked> it is THEY who forsaked the power of words
<overclocked> THEY made NO ATTEMPT to "talk" to us
<overclocked> they just bombed us
<overclocked> at least in the Middle East they TRY to talk once in a while
<Y2J> I know, I feel the same hatred, but I dont see any positives coming out of bombing them
<overclocked> the positive is that we get them on the run so they can't organize any more attacks
<overclocked> if we leave them alone, they'll take that as a victory
<Y2J> that attack was planned for years, Im sure they have more people in America ready to unleash horror
<overclocked> they'll take that victory and try to build on it
<Y2J> we will never find them all
<Y2J> its an impossible war to win
<overclocked> we'll certainly never find them all if we just pull back and do nothing
<overclocked> like you're suggesting
<Y2J> either way we wont
<Y2J> might as well make peace
<overclocked> IT WILL NOT LEAD TO PEACE YOU IDIOT!!!!
<Y2J> theres a chance it will
<Y2J> theres no chance bombing will
<overclocked> bull****
<overclocked> if we just pull away and do nothing to retaliate, they will take that as a victory and perform more attacks
<Y2J> so we agree to disagree
<Y2J> no, if we pull out, they will lose their hatred
<overclocked> nonsense
<overclocked> look
<overclocked> if a bully knocks you down and you do nothing he'll knock you down again again
<overclocked> and again and again
<Y2J> why do they hate us? becauwe we stick our nose in others business...Kuwait, iraq, iran, etc
<Y2J> WE ARE THE BULLY
<overclocked> you're an idiot
<overclocked> if you don't like it here in the US then go help the Taliban
<overclocked> you seem to be on their side anyway
<Y2J> theres too much anger in our country, but we have to look at our mistakes too
<Y2J> its hard for Bush to do that
<overclocked> No, the anger is coming from the Taliban, not us
<Y2J> Just to clear up your view, you agree bombing will lead to retaliation by them, and mroe by us..What will that accomplish?
<overclocked> the outcome will be fewer attacks against us - that's the whole point of war
<overclocked> you know what? Terrorism doesn't work
<overclocked> it has NEVER been used successfully to win an arguement
<Y2J> fewer attacks? how can that be if you anger them further? There are terrorists in all countries, in many organziations, not just the Taliban, terrorism will not die from this.
<overclocked> rolling over and doing nothing will be sending a message to the entire world that we can be beaten by a single attack
<overclocked> can you image what Iraq would do with that?
<overclocked> Or Syria
<Y2J> beaten? no, we will take it as a wake up call. we have to focus on protecting the country better, not worrying about others
<Y2J> ucla game is starting, we should post this conversation on G|A and see what others think
<overclocked> ok - define "protecting our country"
<Y2J> protecting our country -- Keeping the home front safe, developing vaccines in case of bioterorism, educating people, etc.
<Y2J> ok, Im out, if you want to post this, go ahead
<Y2J> good arguing with ya