PDA

View Full Version : tabloid to readers:[goodfellas] f* you, pay me![/goodfellas]



mojo
02-08-2002, 05:48 AM
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-832201.html

Tabloid to readers: Log off and cough up

By Paul Festa
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
February 7, 2002, 3:15 PM PT

You can't believe everything you read in the tabloids, but trust WeeklyWorldNews.com on this one: Sales are down.
The American Media-owned tabloid's Web site has been running a pitch for two weeks that tells readers in no uncertain terms that their preference for the free site over paid subscriptions and newsstand sales is cutting into the company's bottom line.

"I've had enough of this free Web crap," reads the notice, signed by Weekly World News regular columnist "Ed Anger." "When I was a kid, the only thing we got for free was a beating."

In the age of "free Web crap," it's Weekly World News' circulation that has taken a beating. In March 2000, circulation was 306,000 per week. A year later, that was down to 254,000, according to American Media.

Anger proceeds to urge readers ("all you deadbeats") to purchase copies of the publication or risk losing the Web site altogether.

"It's better on paper anyway," Anger insists. "We kill 300,000 trees a year just so our loyal readers can take this fun publication to their bathrooms. You have a computer in your bathroom? Ha! I didn't think so."

American Media representatives called the Web page a "gag," but one with a purpose.

"It is an attempt to build newsstand sales for Weekly World News," said company spokesman Gerald McKelvey.

Weekly World News joins an array of media properties experimenting with ways of inducing their online readers to pay for content. Yahoo and Motley Fool have added fee-based content recently, while the Jerusalem Post is requiring readers to first enter a drawing with full identifying information.

American Media acknowledged that its newsstand and subscription sales have taken a hit among its other properties as well, which include the National Enquirer, Star and Country Weekly Magazine.

"I would say that it's clearly evident--what you give away for nothing it's difficult to get people to buy," McKelvey said. "This is something pretty much endemic to print publications that also have Web sites."

McKelvey said American Media toyed with the idea of charging subscription fees for its Web sites, a ploy that has worked for only a tiny handful of non-pornographic content sites.

"We're a long way from doing that," McKelvey said. "This is just a reminder to readers that we make money on sales, not on freebies."

attgig
02-08-2002, 06:52 AM
I wonder about nytimes as well....
Ever since I discovered the website with the whole paper for free about 5 years ago, I never thought about buying a copy (especially since they raised the prices right around then)

whitak24
02-08-2002, 07:10 AM
i don't think newspapers (ie the ny times) have anything to worry about just yet from the internet. long-term, i think they do, but right now, it's basically a lot of people who wouldn't buy the paper anyway who are reading it for free online.

Jeffbx
02-08-2002, 10:13 AM
Originally posted by mojo
"When I was a kid, the only thing we got for free was a beating."



:heh:

eSDee
02-08-2002, 01:07 PM
It is interesting the way publications differ from print to the web. For instance, if you want a brand new newspaper, you have to buy it. However if you are looking for old news stories, you can go and read them for free at the library. Conversely, a lot of newpapers(LA Times, Washington Herald) let you read the day's paper for free; however if you want to access their archives you have to pay for it.

Jihforce
02-08-2002, 02:35 PM
I highly doubt newpapers make money from the sales. They make more money from the folks who placed the ads.

Markel
02-08-2002, 02:39 PM
Originally posted by Jihforce
I highly doubt newpapers make money from the sales. They make more money from the folks who placed the ads.
But the higher the circulation, the more they can demand for the ads.