PDA

View Full Version : naughty issue with mail (or look what i got again!)



topane
08-01-2002, 08:27 AM
I'd hate to be the guy reading it after you... :eek:

jase71
08-01-2002, 08:39 AM
Wow! The NFL PREVIEW issue!









:P

Freelance Superhero
08-01-2002, 08:51 AM
is it just me, or does that cover look reaaaally cheap with all them neon colors and such?
and the girl ain't that pretty either...

hoey222
08-01-2002, 09:25 AM
Originally posted by jase71
Wow! The NFL PREVIEW issue!


:P


ya - i just get it for the articles too.........










NOT!!!

ProMinx
08-01-2002, 09:37 AM
Originally posted by Freelance Superhero
is it just me, or does that cover look reaaaally cheap with all them neon colors and such?
and the girl ain't that pretty either...

She looks like a wannabe replacement for their last favorite crack whore, Pamela Anderson. Doesn't she look like a Pamela clone? I guess we couldn't really tell until you pulled the rest of that black cover off...

And why are you posting pictures of your Playboy subscription? That seems just a bit odd to me. Maybe I'm not the only one smoking right now...

The Inquisitive Minx

UnReAL
08-01-2002, 09:39 AM
if you have ever had a new playboy, you know firsthand that the pictoral pages come stuck together. must have something to do with the printing process or something. secondly, that chick Jordan is disgusting... if anyone thinks otherwise you might need to see a doctor, or better yet, open your eyes. on a side note, playboy is a horrible magazine, the jokes aren't funny, the stories suck, as do the pictorals. thank god for my free subscription :P. usually when it comes it is in the trash after 5 mins, where it belongs.

SnowSurfer
08-01-2002, 09:43 AM
that girl is ugly...hell if she can get on the cover so can i! lol

ProMinx
08-01-2002, 09:55 AM
Okay, I don't think the girl is gorgeous (and to clarify, I don't think Pam is either)...but she is not ugly. She just looks like a skank. You guys really need to rejudge your standards if you think she's actually "ugly"...and maybe that explains why you've never spoken to a girl off of the internet.

Hiro
08-01-2002, 10:11 AM
Originally posted by Freelance Superhero
is it just me, or does that cover look reaaaally cheap with all them neon colors and such?
and the girl ain't that pretty either...
:stupid:

Kevster
08-01-2002, 10:19 AM
Originally posted by Freelance Superhero
and the girl ain't that pretty either...

:hmm:

What's wrong? Giant slug-lips aren't attractive to you?













Me neither.

UnReAL
08-01-2002, 10:54 AM
leathery skin, fake breasts, lips, hair color, and talk about a "great" tatoo. she surely is not attractive. and i am farely certains some of us here do "speak" to women outside of the internet. at least those of us who don't post every 45 seconds do. and some of us would do anything to spend time with those women.

sbp
08-01-2002, 11:47 AM
Sad to say the Jordan pictorial was the only decent one.

SnowSurfer
08-01-2002, 11:51 AM
actually i do think she is ugly and i do talk to lots of girls offline i dont post all the time and i havent been posting alot only when i get some down time.

Merlin
08-01-2002, 12:44 PM
You fools are crazy! Katie Price (Jordan) is just plain smokin hot. Yeah the cover is a little too neon but please...

Lets see...
Fake boobs --- If you can touch 'em then they are real.
Big Lips --- Can you say DSL?
Hair color --- What woman doesnt color her hair?

Scoff all you want but one of those would make me a pretty happy fella. :drool:

Freelance Superhero
08-01-2002, 01:07 PM
Originally posted by Merlin
You fools are crazy! Katie Price (Jordan) is just plain smokin hot. Yeah the cover is a little too neon but please...

Lets see...
Fake boobs --- If you can touch 'em then they are real.
Big Lips --- Can you say DSL?
Hair color --- What woman doesnt color her hair?

Scoff all you want but one of those would make me a pretty happy fella. :drool:
i dunno, she looks rather mannish in that cover pic... :dodgy:

like, if you just look for a bit, you can totally see how she could look like an ex-man...

brain
08-01-2002, 01:21 PM
Originally posted by Freelance Superhero

i dunno, she looks rather mannish in that cover pic... :dodgy:

like, if you just look for a bit, you can totally see how she could look like an ex-man...

Hmm... Hope you haven't encountered too many of these "ex-men".

Memo
08-01-2002, 01:34 PM
This girl is definately not the hottest woman alive. I have the issue too, but she is a HOT woman man. Her eyes are pretty incredible. Chosen's photo is really bad too as is the front cover (Wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too much makeup). And leathery skin? Geez man you act like you've met this person, it's the cover of a magazine. I doubt not one guy would look at this girl if she was walking down the street and at least pop half a chub.

Speedfreak
08-01-2002, 02:26 PM
She looks like she is gpoing to bite your head off. Just like the Mantis after copulation.

joejun
08-01-2002, 08:23 PM
I got it for the interview with Larry Ell...

Ahh, ok, whatever you want to say, Jordan's got some TIG-O-BITTIES :eye: And if you have the mag, you know that whoever put the tatoo of that butterfly must have had a HARD time :P

joe52985
08-01-2002, 09:24 PM
hehe DSLs. Sorta sounds like DSF, i think you can figure it out, its the whole face package that makes a DSF, DSLs are just the beginging

Freelance Superhero
08-01-2002, 11:47 PM
Originally posted by chosenfool
stuff he said damn dude, take it easy... :hoboy:
anything i had to say was spoken with no malicious intent, nor with a judgmental tone towards you. i mean, if you're allowed to say "va va voom," am i not equally entitled to say "nah, i don't think she's that cute"? and no, of course i've never spoken to her, but you are right by saying that's not the point; it's completely based on her looks, and you just happen to think differently than i do. if you ask me, you're the one overreacting here.

anyway, i'm not tryin to start anything with you, but just caaaaaaalm down man! don't take our comments or criticisms so seriously. we all just funkin around here anyway... ;)

and as for DSL's... that would be referring to Lips that are ideal for Sucking certain things that begin with the letter D. yall get it now?;)

oh, and DSF's are pretty much the same, but you got the whole Face goin on there...

Merlin
08-02-2002, 05:10 AM
Originally posted by DarkFury

Ok.. you might have to explain DSL and DSF for me... :shrug:


(I'm sure I'm not the only one who really doesn't know what you are talkin' about here...)

Well the "D" you'll have to come up with on your own but the others are "S"ucking "L"ips.

DSF is a new one to me :shrug:

Freelance Superhero
08-02-2002, 04:39 PM
Originally posted by chosenfool


OH! *I* need to calm down? IM the one overreacting? sheesh. you didnt read the whole post i wrote, did you? just saw and thought "how pissed off" i was at how critical you people are of something that should have been for fun. geez.

I didnt take the picture attacks as being towards ME, nor did i take THAT personally (thats stupid and beneath me). It was because you attacked a picture, now THAT is stupid. No, im not calling YOU stupid, just the reaction you and some people here had of it. I cant believe that such a simple picture will get such a rash of harsh and negative comments. Thats sad. it was set up for FUN, nothing else.

*I* said for YOU guys to calm down first (pulled that pole out yet?), cuz you guys seem to be all over the pic in a heartbeat, just so ready to take something down. I wonder why you feel the need to be "funkin around" in such a derogatory manner. Yes, it was derogatory. not even fun schitt.

I REPEAT: IT WAS FOR FUN!

and i guess "funkin around" with it was fun for you. oh well. i guess thats whats called FUN now. :rolleyes:

sad.

very sad. :disa:

on that note im done commenting on this. Its all stupid. not stupid fun, but just plain stupid.
whaaaaaat? come on, how can you put up a picture (a provocative one at that) and not expect people to react to it? not everyone who sees that cover is gonna go "oooh, she's hot" or even "oooh, she's decent," which apparently are the only reactions to the picture that you find acceptable. otherwise, we're just not "having fun" with it, right? :rolleyes: how do you mean it "should have been for fun?" what exactly is "having fun" with this pic? the reason why i'm so confused is that i thought the thread and discussion was fine and entertaining until you posted about how absurd you thought some of the comments were. that came outta nowhere...

if we don't like what we see, just move on? so you're saying only those opinions that agree with your own should be posted? we're not "attacking" the picture, we're giving harmless opinions. it's not even like anybody said anything horribly critical. like i said, if you're allowed to post about how "va va va voom" you think she is, aren't we allowed to post about how much we think the opposite?

UNLESS, of course, you don't necessarily think she's all that attractive either, and the sole reason you created the thread was to be funny with your breast puns, in which case i totally missed the point. :shrug:

and i don't want this to come across in a mean way, but what was all that about talking to her on the street and knees knocking and not dissing her if we don't know her and what?? you totally lost me there... :confused:

in any case, i really don't see what you're upset about, because i think you misinterpreted our comments.

Merlin
08-02-2002, 06:02 PM
Don't you fools realize he was showing off his free mag? One that we all knows contains much goodness. And what happens? The thread turns into a critique of the cover. :disa:

Hey, keep posting when you get 'em. I get my subscription at about the same time and like having fun with it. :thumb:

Freelance Superhero
08-02-2002, 07:22 PM
:shrug:

ok ok, disregard everything i said, sheesh. you guys are right, i'm wrong. the girl's hot, she's got big boobs, haha it's funny, free playboy is great, yadda yadda yadda, etc. etc. etc.