PDA

View Full Version : Serial Killer Scheduled for Release



sbp
08-19-2002, 03:35 AM
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=519&ncid=718&e=10&u=/ap/20020818/ap_on_re_us/serial_killer_release_3

HOUSTON (AP) - The murders were as random as they were vicious: stabbings, hangings, stranglings, drownings. The women didn't know each other or the hooded man who, according to one survivor, enjoyed the killing so much he was "clapping and dancing."

Police eventually caught up with Coral Eugene Watts but couldn't connect him to the savage crimes in Texas and Michigan.

Desperate to close the cases, prosecutors agreed to a plea bargain. In 1982, Watts admitted he killed 13 women — "They had evil in their eyes," he said — but he went to prison for burglary with intent to commit murder.

He was sentenced to 60 years, and prosecutors, police and the judge thought that was enough.

Now, a quirk in the Texas legal system may short-circuit their intentions. Mandatory release laws aimed at relieving prison crowding require Watts be discharged on May 8, 2006, unless he loses good behavior credits that he has accumulated in prison. He will be 52.

Watts is believed to have killed dozens of women, and authorities in Texas and Michigan are scouring old files, archives and evidence folders for any shred that might tie him to an open case for which he didn't receive immunity in the plea.

"Everybody knows he is going to kill again," said Houston police Sgt. Tom Ladd, who interrogated Watts after his arrest in 1982. "His last statement to me was: 'You know, Tom, if I get out, I'm going to do it again.'"

"He's a homicidal time bomb," Ladd said.

Watts declined an interview request from The Associated Press. His defense attorney in 1982, Zinetta Burney, did not return calls requesting comment.

Finding new evidence will be tough, Ladd said. DNA testing wasn't done in the 1980s, and evidence collection was handled differently.

And with Watts' attacks lasting just moments, he left little behind, the homicide detective said.

"He was a stalker, a predator," Ladd said. "He would get in his car at night and he would drive around and he would see a female, and he would follow that female, and he would kill that female, and he would get back in his car. He might look for another one, he might go home."

Watts first came to the attention of authorities in Michigan in 1974 when he was accused of choking and beating a woman in Kalamazoo. He was convicted of aggravated assault in 1975 and spent a year in jail.

He then moved to Ann Arbor, where police kept a close eye on him but never caught him committing a crime.

"There was no DNA, and lacking eyewitnesses, lacking a smoking gun, it is very hard to prove a case," retired Ann Arbor police detective Paul Bunten said.

Michigan authorities eventually suspected Watts of attacking at least 14 women and killing eight in Ann Arbor, Detroit and the neighboring Canadian town of Windsor between October 1979 and November 1980, according to the Houston Chronicle.

But they could do little more than relay their suspicions and details of Watts' background to Houston authorities after he moved south in 1981.

"Logistically, it was impossible to keep a 24-hour tab on this guy," Ladd said. "We didn't have anything to follow him on."

Twelve Texas women died before Watts crossed paths with police again.

On May 23, 1982, Watts choked to death Michelle Maday, 20.

Two hours later, he choked and beat Lori Lister in a parking lot outsider her home, then dragged her limp body up to her apartment.

Lister's roommate, Melinda Aguilar, awoke and found Watts staring her in the face.

"He grabbed me, pulled my hair back and started choking me," Aguilar said. "I pretended like I passed out."

Watts bound both women's hands with wire hangers.

"I knew he was there to kill just by the excitement he had," Aguilar said. "He enjoyed what he was doing. I remember him jumping and clapping and being excited about what he was doing."

While Watts filled the bathtub, Aguilar slipped out and called police, who arrived in time to grab Watts as he ran out the front door.

"It is a miracle I'm alive," said Lister, who was rescued from the bathtub and resuscitated. "I was told and promised that he would serve his full 60 years. It took me years to get over a lot of fears. It would be a constant threat to me for him to be out."

Texas' mandatory release program was approved in 1977 and rescinded in 1996, but prisoners who qualified in between those times remained eligible. Watts has earned enough good behavior credits to be freed in 2006.

Bryan Collier, director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice's parole division, said that if Watts gets out in 2006 he will be watched closely from his release until his 60-year sentence expires in 2042.

"We would try and come up with the very best supervision plan we possibly could," Collier said.

Harriett Semander, whose 20-year-old daughter Elena Semander was strangled with her own shirt, isn't convinced that will be enough.

"There's no doubt in my mind that he has been sitting in prison for the last 20 years planning his next murder," she said. "This man was street smart. He was cunning. He liked what he did. Of course he is going to do it again, and when there is the next victim, we can all take the blame for it."

----------
So this killer gets sentenced to 60 years {a light sentence}, does 24 years and gets out to murder again. Is it any wonder people have little faith in the criminal justice system? Yet another case of revolving door justice...

Wonder where all the bleeding hearts are now.

topane
08-19-2002, 05:05 AM
Yay, our legal system at work once again.

Wait a minute... Texas didn't execute someone?

Kim
08-19-2002, 06:39 AM
Very disturbing. :angry:

WhiskeyPapa
08-19-2002, 06:45 AM
He won't get out. They'll find some way to keep him in.

Ladogaboy
08-19-2002, 11:45 AM
Oh well... at least he is in Texas. :shrug:

jase71
08-19-2002, 12:00 PM
This is the flip side to the "three strikes and you're out", and the longer, tougher sentences for non-violent crimes like drug possession.

Longer, tougher sentences mean more people in prison. More people in prison means either spending more money on prisons (which many states can't afford), or finding some way to relieve the crowding, like early releases for good behavior. There are only so many cells, and for each guy that goes in, one's gotta come out.

Maybe situations like this will get people thinking about alternative solutions, rather than just reacting by increasing sentences every time the media hypes the crime problem.

Ladogaboy
08-19-2002, 12:27 PM
Originally posted by jase71
Maybe situations like this will get people thinking about alternative solutions, rather than just reacting by increasing sentences every time the media hypes the crime problem.

Like the guy who puts up tents in the middle of the Arizona desert, dresses his inmates in pink hospital robes (split down the back for those of you that don't know ;) ), and feeds them nothing but bologna sandwiches? :hehehmm:

molecularfire
08-19-2002, 12:39 PM
Originally posted by jase71
This is the flip side to the "three strikes and you're out", and the longer, tougher sentences for non-violent crimes like drug possession.

Longer, tougher sentences mean more people in prison. More people in prison means either spending more money on prisons (which many states can't afford), or finding some way to relieve the crowding, like early releases for good behavior. There are only so many cells, and for each guy that goes in, one's gotta come out.

Maybe situations like this will get people thinking about alternative solutions, rather than just reacting by increasing sentences every time the media hypes the crime problem.
:stupid: We've gotta start killing these people more efficiently so that they don't take up too much space and money.