sbp
04-25-2003, 07:57 PM
A group of Florida-based porn peddlers, penis enlargement and Viagra spammers has united to file suit against anti-spam organisations.
Under the newly-registered name EmarketersAmerica.org, a front set up by notorious spammer Eddy Marin's lawyer Mark E. Felstein, the suit seeks to force prominent anti-spam organisations to stop blocking their spam.
A long list of individuals and anti-spam organisations preventing bulk mailers from getting their spam out, including the UK-based Spamhaus Project and Spews.org, are listed in the suit.
The civil action law-suit, filed on April 14, seeks an injunction against anti-spam organisation on behalf of the plaintiffs. It also seek damages of $75,000 (plus interest and costs) against the defendants on five separate counts: blacklisting IP addresses of the plaintiffs, libel, invasion of privacy, the publication of allegedly false information and "intentional interference with a contract".
Steve Linford, of The Spamhaus Project, told us the law suit was without merit and purely motivated by an attempt to waste the time and energy of those fighting against the spam menace.
"Spammers will try anything. These lawsuits are intended to tie you up in defending it, wasting time and money," said Linford.
more here: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/30368.html
another link: http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,110400,00.asp
"They're interfering with a contract between the members of our association, the tier-one providers, and the American people," says Mark Felstein, director of the trade group and the attorney who brought the suit. "I believe they're doing it for their own financial gain."
-------------
Talk about brazen.
There's a contract to send out unsolicited spam? :rolleyes:
Under the newly-registered name EmarketersAmerica.org, a front set up by notorious spammer Eddy Marin's lawyer Mark E. Felstein, the suit seeks to force prominent anti-spam organisations to stop blocking their spam.
A long list of individuals and anti-spam organisations preventing bulk mailers from getting their spam out, including the UK-based Spamhaus Project and Spews.org, are listed in the suit.
The civil action law-suit, filed on April 14, seeks an injunction against anti-spam organisation on behalf of the plaintiffs. It also seek damages of $75,000 (plus interest and costs) against the defendants on five separate counts: blacklisting IP addresses of the plaintiffs, libel, invasion of privacy, the publication of allegedly false information and "intentional interference with a contract".
Steve Linford, of The Spamhaus Project, told us the law suit was without merit and purely motivated by an attempt to waste the time and energy of those fighting against the spam menace.
"Spammers will try anything. These lawsuits are intended to tie you up in defending it, wasting time and money," said Linford.
more here: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/30368.html
another link: http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,110400,00.asp
"They're interfering with a contract between the members of our association, the tier-one providers, and the American people," says Mark Felstein, director of the trade group and the attorney who brought the suit. "I believe they're doing it for their own financial gain."
-------------
Talk about brazen.
There's a contract to send out unsolicited spam? :rolleyes: