PDA

View Full Version : porn advertising gone too far


blueindian
03-24-2004, 04:24 AM
Yesterday, I started reading The Rape of Nanking. Today I was looking for some additional photos since the book only has a few. I did this (http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=nanking+photos) google search.

Per usual, I clicked in the first link and was quite supprised to find myself at a porn site (apparently specializing in rape). After clicking back (a few times so as to escape the mousetrap) to the search results I realized that I was looking at a whole page of porn sites.

This is disgusting. Akin, IMHO, to using the Holocaust or 9/11 to attract folks to a porn site. Nothing wrong with porn, but a lot wrong with the way it's been advertised in this case.
look_ma
03-24-2004, 11:29 AM
Yuh, little kids research stuff like holocaust and 9/11 and that is what they see. pr0n companies have been at is for ages. I remember back in the day when one of my friends went to whitehouse,com (used comma so no link) instead of .gov for a school presentation, needless to say he had to do some explaining.
Showtime
03-24-2004, 12:07 PM
Nanking was no joke. The Japanese were terribly cruel and evil to those people. It's funny how a lot of other atrocities got publicized but Nanking was kinda glossed over. Maybe cuz it was in China....

-jel
blueindian
03-24-2004, 01:37 PM
Originally posted by the jello is jigglin
Nanking was no joke. The Japanese were terribly cruel and evil to those people. It's funny how a lot of other atrocities got publicized but Nanking was kinda glossed over. Maybe cuz it was in China....

-jel

yep, i'm about 1/4 through the book and i'm absolutly amazed and horrified.
HmpDeeHmp
03-24-2004, 01:38 PM
Originally posted by the jello is jigglin
Nanking was no joke. The Japanese were terribly cruel and evil to those people. It's funny how a lot of other atrocities got publicized but Nanking was kinda glossed over. Maybe cuz it was in China....

-jel

Isn't that usually the case though when it involves certain minority groups? :shake: I happen to be reading a book about China right now called 1421 and the author supports his claim that the Chinese were in fact the first people to "discover" many lands (including America), although other historians claim otherwise.
topane
03-24-2004, 02:20 PM
You should learn to read the excerpt from the site before clicking:

rape of nanking photos. Click for more.... 0-9 A B C D E F G H I
J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z free virgin rape free lesbian
Showtime
03-24-2004, 02:44 PM
Originally posted by topane
You should learn to read the excerpt from the site before clicking:


Oh, like you went to correct one first... ;)

-jel:halo:
Nija
03-24-2004, 03:32 PM
Originally posted by topane
You should learn to read the excerpt from the site before clicking:


:stupid:

I never blindly click the first one (why do that when you could just click the feeling lucky button)
Tommy Boomfiger
03-24-2004, 03:40 PM
Originally posted by look_ma
Yuh, little kids research stuff like holocaust and 9/11 and that is what they see. pr0n companies have been at is for ages. I remember back in the day when one of my friends went to whitehouse,com (used comma so no link) instead of .gov for a school presentation, needless to say he had to do some explaining. hehe, one of my high school teachers did that on a library projector once. man did his face turn red :sweat:
kimchicowboy
03-24-2004, 08:07 PM
Originally posted by blueindian
Yesterday, I started reading The Rape of Nanking. Today I was looking for some additional photos since the book only has a few. I did this (http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=nanking+photos) google search.

the pics in the book are enough for me. :(
Bires
03-24-2004, 08:51 PM
Originally posted by blueindian
...Nothing wrong with porn...

Oh? Then why does it bother you to have the pirates links, pop-ups and pop-unders?

For many of us, there is a lot wrong with porn. :)
blueindian
03-25-2004, 04:56 AM
Originally posted by Bires


Oh? Then why does it bother you to have the pirates links, pop-ups and pop-unders?

For many of us, there is a lot wrong with porn. :)

My problem is not with the content of those sites**, but the fact that they are using a serious tragedy in a sick attempt to promote their site. A similar situation would be if a google search for 9/11 photos turned up pages and pages of links to sites about, oh say, Catholicism. That would piss me off too because they would be trying to use a serious tragedy to promote their religion.


To those that say to read the site description first: i agree and normally do. call it a momentary lapse of reason.

**actually, i sort of do have a problem with the content of those particular sites (rape sites) but that's another thread alltogether.