PDA

View Full Version : Woman, 55, Delivers Triplet Grandchildren



nickel
12-29-2004, 11:32 AM
55-Year-Old Happy After Having Triplets
Wednesday, December 29, 2004

http://www.foxnews.com/images/149033/0_21_122804_triplets.jpg

RICHMOND, Va. — A 55-year-old woman who gave birth to triplets for a daughter who was medically unable to conceive said Wednesday she was "a caring incubator" and was awe-struck when she learned she was carrying three children.

Tina Cade delivered her own grandchildren — two boys and a girl — by Caesarean section Tuesday at Bon Secours St. Mary's Hospital. She served as a surrogate for her oldest daughter, Camille Hammond, and Hammond's husband, Jason.

She told NBC's "Today" that she was "awe-struck — I could not believe it" when the doctor told her there would be triplets.

Hammond, 29, suffers from endometriosis, a condition that affects the lining of the uterus and makes it difficult to become pregnant. She and her husband, both resident physicians at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, tried for four years to conceive.

Cade underwent in-vitro fertilization in the spring.

"Well, it was actually my idea with my husband," Cade said on ABC's "Good Morning America." "We had seen a movie many years ago that showed a similar predicament and when this opportunity presented itself, we knew we just had to do something to make a difference to Jason and Camille. And we think that this has."


Camille Hammond said she was "overwhelmed" by her first look at the three infants, and her husband said "they were all just so beautiful, we were just overcome."

"We all just melted," Jason Hammond said on NBC. "Holding them for the first time, I have to learn how to balance all three. It will be fun, though."

The couple declined to disclose their names.

The babies, who were due in mid-February, are in intensive care. The C-section was scheduled after Cade came in for an appointment and doctors noticed swelling. She was admitted Monday.

"I was a caring incubator and that's how I saw myself," Cade said.

The boys weighed 4 pounds, 9 ounces and 3 pounds, 12 ounces; the girl weighed 4 pounds, 10 ounces.

Asked if she had any counsel for the new parents, Cade, who is director of multicultural affairs at the University of Richmond, said: "Just to love them. Unconditional love. That conquers so many hurdles and challenges."

The National Center for Health Statistics said 12 children were born in 2002 to women ages 50 to 54 who carried triplets. The center only records surviving infants, and does not maintain statistics for women 55 and over.

linkified (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,142829,00.html)

welfareloser
12-29-2004, 01:39 PM
that's beautiful when it works out so well... most women half her age can't carry three babies so well. actually... she looks about half her age!!! surrogate motherhood is a beautiful thing, isn't it? :) i'd do it for family, that's for sure... but probly not for a stranger. it's $10,000+ and a wonderful thing to do, but i have to balance that with the toll it would take on my health when i've got my own family to care for... not quite as extreme as donating a kidney, but still...

and i wonder if it feels creepy to carry a baby that's entirely unrelated to you?

how does anyone else feel about donating baby-making parts? i wouldn't donate an egg, because i'd feel like crap knowing that my bilogical offspring were out there being raised by someone else, and not me... and that's something you can make a few thousand dollars doing, and it's pretty low-risk... your hormones are screwed up for a month or two is all.

i've known guys, on the other hand, who have happily donated sperm at $50 per cupful. :P i guess it's less of a big deal to have a bunch of unknown offspring running around for guys in general...

ialsohaveadream
12-29-2004, 01:54 PM
I couldn't do the sperm donation thing. The curiosity of how the kids would turn out would kill me. Damned nature vs. nurture debate!

The only situation I can consider is if one of my lesbian friends asked me to "lend a cup". I'd at least think about it if that happened.

BrewMaster
12-29-2004, 02:00 PM
i'd never do the sperm donation thing for anyone. just not my thing. and since some donors are now being tracked down by their biological kids, things are getting a bit more interesting around the whole subject.

good for that family though. seems like a good arrangement to keep it in the family.

welfareloser
12-29-2004, 02:03 PM
yeah, that does bring up some issues... that, and people who don't know they have the same daddy hooking up later...

if you do loan a cup to some lesbian friends, just draw up some paperwork beforehand to make sure it is clear that you are 100% not financially responsibly for the child in any way... i know of at least one case where, in court, the guy said he simply agreed to be a sperm donor, the woman said nuh-uh, and the judge sided with the woman...

it saves thosuands of dollars to artificially inseminate without the fertility clinic as the middleman, but a lawyer writin up a contract beforehand would be $200 well spent, i think.

Gothic Girl
12-29-2004, 02:04 PM
I would probably do the egg thing. I wouldn't do it for money though. I think that being able to give someone the ultimate gift of life would be my reward.

ialsohaveadream
12-29-2004, 02:07 PM
My genes are barely in demand from the women I date, so I'm not holding my breath on the lesbians asking me for them. ;)

BrewMaster
12-29-2004, 02:14 PM
it saves thosuands of dollars to artificially inseminate without the fertility clinic as the middleman
is that just a nice way of saying boning? and if so, is it so "artificial?"

welfareloser
12-29-2004, 02:25 PM
no... i mean, that's one way to do it, but pretty distasteful if you're not into guys or at least not that particular guy... some lesbians will get a friend to whack it in the bathroom, take the cup when he's done, and get it where it needs to be on their own. so, it is kinda artificial ;)

BrewMaster
12-29-2004, 02:28 PM
no... i mean, that's one way to do it, but pretty distasteful if you're not into guys or at least not that particular guy... some lesbians will get a friend to whack it in the bathroom, take the cup when he's done, and get it where it needs to be on their own. so, it is kinda artificial ;)
both ways are pretty distasteful IMHO.

ialsohaveadream
12-29-2004, 02:44 PM
no... i mean, that's one way to do it, but pretty distasteful if you're not into guys or at least not that particular guy... some lesbians will get a friend to whack it in the bathroom, take the cup when he's done, and get it where it needs to be on their own. so, it is kinda artificial ;)

Wow. Did anyone else read that and think:
http://www.mm2-nfs4.freeservers.com/images/special_ed.jpg

"Yayyyyyy! I love science!"

BrewMaster
12-29-2004, 02:49 PM
nope, I didn't. but I don't watch Crank Yankers very often.

YanksFanRy
12-29-2004, 03:15 PM
This is quite the story... in a sense I sort of find it a little creepy, not in a bad way, just a sort of weirdly fascinating "isn't science and technology amazing?" sort of thing.

welfareloser
12-29-2004, 03:17 PM
both ways are pretty distasteful IMHO.

sperm meets egg... it's gotta get tehre somehow :shrug: if i wanted a baby without the bone, i think i'd rather do the inseminating by my own hand than have a lab tech do it... unless he was hot :heh:

BrewMaster
12-29-2004, 03:31 PM
sperm meets egg... it's gotta get tehre somehow :shrug: if i wanted a baby without the bone, i think i'd rather do the inseminating by my own hand than have a lab tech do it... unless he was hot :heh:
and if he was hot, he might not use his hand...or the "donor" sperm...:naughty: