02-14-2005, 04:05 PM
check this out guys.....
way better than I expected.
02-14-2005, 04:45 PM
nice ui. i like panning and zooming without reloading like with other maps.
however, u can't search for intersections yet, and can't decipher that if you don't find a street in a specific zip code, look for the street in the city where the zip code is.
02-14-2005, 06:45 PM
googles gonna take over the world!!!!!
02-15-2005, 02:13 PM
That thing is great...
I was playing around with it this weekend - you can type 'restaurants near 123 main st anywhere, ca' and it'll give you a map pinpointing a bunch of restaurants around that location. You can even get as specifc as typing 'pizza near so and so address' & it'll only show the pizza places. Click on one of the restaurants, and it'll pop up a flag with the company's website (if it has one), address & phone #. Very handy for travellers in unfamiliar areas.
I give it two thumbs up!
02-15-2005, 02:36 PM
I guarantee that Google will find a way to make money from this.
03-23-2005, 09:16 AM
Speaking of Google....
News agency's lawsuit tests fair use in the Internet Age
By: ANICK JESDANUN - Associated Press
NEW YORK -- In a case that could set limits on Internet search engines, the French news agency AFP is suing Google Inc. for pulling together photos and story excerpts from thousands of news Web sites.
Agence France-Presse said the "Google News" service infringes on AFP's copyrights by reproducing information from the Web sites of subscribers of the Paris-based news wholesaler.
The issues raised by the case have profound implications for the Internet, where anyone can be a publisher and Web journals, or blogs, are becoming more frequent destinations for seekers of news.
The lawsuit's outcome will likely hinge on whether Mountain View, Calif.-based Google can persuade the courts that Google News constitutes permissible "fair use" of copyright material. Legal scholars say Google could argue that it adds value by significantly improving the news-consuming experience without greatly harming AFP's ability to sell its service.
But in seeking at least $17.5 million in damages, AFP says Google adds little because its news site looks much like those of AFP subscribers, albeit one where software and not human editors determine the placement of stories on a page.
The U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., where the lawsuit was filed Thursday, will ultimately have to balance search engines' desire to give consumers convenience, selling ads in the process, and copyright owners' rights to control their works.
"The story (of the Internet) from day one has been one of waves of liberalization followed by attempts at control," said Jonathan Zittrain, a Harvard law professor. "It's rightly up to the courts and the government to figure out where the lines should be drawn."
It's possible, though, for the courts to skirt key issues given Google's promise this week to remove the AFP items in question, though technically that's not something that can be done overnight.
AFP lawyer Joshua Kaufman said the lawsuit would nevertheless proceed because damage already has been done.
The Google News service, which debuted in 2002, scans some 4,500 news outlets and highlights the top stories under common categories such as world and sports.
Many stories carry a small image, or thumbnail, along with the headline and the first sentence or two. Visitors can click on the headline to read the full story at the source Web site.
Yahoo Inc. has a similar service, though it uses human editors and pays some news sources, including AFP and The Associated Press, for rights. (Google wouldn't comment on any similar financial arrangements.)
In a statement, Google spokesman Steve Langdon said Web sites can request removal though most "want to be included in Google News because they believe it is a benefit to them and their readers."
In fact, AFP's own Web site includes a "robots.txt" file that spurns search engines, essentially telling them to avoid indexing its news pages.
But the case is complicated by the fact that the stories come not directly from AFP but from its subscribers, some of which might want the rest of their sites indexed to generate ad-boosting referrals.
The fair use argument will likely draw upon a 2002 appeals court ruling that thumbnail images serve a different, transformative function as compared to full-size originals -- and thus constitute fair use.
But Charles D. Ossola, who handled that appeal on behalf of the copyright holder, said that ruling may not apply to the use of text, given that summaries can be rewritten whereas images cannot for search purposes.
A 1985 Supreme Court ruling on a non-Internet copyright dispute found that small excerpts can constitute infringement if they represent the heart of the work. AFP argues that the headline and the first sentence of a story constitute such an essence.
"They capture the reader's attention and describe what the rest of the article is about," the lawsuit said.
AP spokesman Jack Stokes came out in AFP's support, issuing a statement that AP believes "intellectual property laws protect news. That protection is important to ensure that organizations such as the AP can afford to collect news."
That said, facts cannot be copyrighted, and Google may have a claim on such citations if they are mostly based on facts not expression, said Fred von Lohmann, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a civil liberties group in San Francisco.
Von Lohmann said a ruling against Google also could harm the free exchange of ideas on blogs, which often cite and link to news stories.
The AFP case is not the only lawsuit challenging a search engine's practices. A Web site that sells nude photos of women has sued Google, accusing it of distributing links and passwords. Several companies also have sued Google and others over the use of trademarks as keywords for triggering a rival's ads.
"They are becoming multimedia centers rather than simply indexing information for consumers," said Ossola, who represents Geico Corp. in one such trademark case against Google. "The argument of convenience and benefits to consumers only goes so far when it runs into what are the legitimate rights" of intellectual property owners.
AP investigative researcher Randy Herschaft contributed to this report.
03-23-2005, 10:36 AM
It is more than 5 miles off when I type in my address. At least Mappoint.com is only a mile off.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.