PDA

View Full Version : It Costs Intel About $40 to Make a Chip’s Core, Says In-Stat



zippyjuan
09-14-2005, 12:07 PM
Intel’s Die Cost is $40 – Research Firm.
It Costs Intel About $40 to Make a Chip’s Core, Says In-Stat

Category: CPU

by Anton Shilov

[ 09/13/2005 | 10:23 PM ]


Research firm In-Stat believes that it costs Intel Corp. about $40 in average to produce a single die, despite of the fact that equipment involved into manufacturing has become more expensive since 2003. The analysts claim that Intel’s manufacturing strength is preeminent and this allows the world’s largest chipmaker to save money.

“As other semiconductor manufacturers turn towards partnerships for developing new process technologies and manufacturing capacity, Intel is one of the few vendors that can continue to push ahead alone and uses its technology and capacity as a competitive strength,” says Jim McGregor, In-Stat analyst.

Intel currently has three 90nm fabs, and will have four 65nm fabs, including one retro fit and one 90nm conversion, ramping in 2006. The transition to 65nm process technology, which is about to begin with first revenue shipments scheduled in Q4 2005, is also likely to boost Intel’s strengths. In fact, according to the high-tech research firm, Intel wants to move the entire product portfolio to a single process technology with its transition to 65nm.

“In 2004, with a strong transition to the 90nm process node and 300mm wafers, Intel realized an estimated savings of $1 billion in manufacturing costs,” Mr. McGregor said.

Despite the rising cost of fabs, mask sets, and in some cases, the die size, Intel’s average manufacturing cost per die will remain relatively constant at approximately $40 during 2003-2005, In-Stat reports. Even though Intel’s thinner manufacturing technologies allowed the firm to shrink die sizes, it added cache and functionality to its chips, which also increased die sizes. For instance, die size of Intel Northwood core is 131 square millimeter, die size of Intel Prescott processor is roughly 112 square millimeters, while Intel Prescott 2M chip has die size of 135 square millimeters.

Still, an average cost of a die is not necessarily an indicator of average manufacturing cost of a processor, as final products need to be tested, qualified and packaged. Additionally, given that Intel makes Itanium 2 chips with billions of transistors as well as tiny network controllers, which cost difference is may be in thousands of dollars, average cost does not show much.

nate el bueno
09-15-2005, 07:34 PM
is also likely to boost Intel’s strengths


why is this plural :lmfao:

Kevster
09-15-2005, 07:46 PM
why is this plural :lmfao:

Maybe because Intel is a noun and the use of the apostrophe shows possession? (http://www.sunysuffolk.edu/Web/Selden/OWL/apostrophe.htm#POSSESSION)

Or is it because Intel also makes many other types of processors, from microcontrollers to switch processors to ASICs that all benefit from this new fabrication technology and they'll see the same cost efficiency boost on those as well?

eSDee
09-15-2005, 08:13 PM
why is this plural :lmfao:


Maybe because Intel is a noun and the use of the apostrophe shows possession? (http://www.sunysuffolk.edu/Web/Selden/OWL/apostrophe.htm#POSSESSION)

Or is it because Intel also makes many other types of processors, from microcontrollers to switch processors to ASICs that all benefit from this new fabrication technology and they'll see the same cost efficiency boost on those as well?

Owned.

Intel has to own all of it's own production equipment if it plans to ship all chips for PC's AND Mac's AND the XBox. You can't put that kind of trust in another company to fill that large of an order.

So when can we start putting these into people's cars and letting them run on their own? Old folks and people who like to talk on their cell phone on the freeway would benefit immediately.

nate el bueno
09-15-2005, 08:56 PM
the plural i meant was in the word "strengths". i quoted, but for some reason it didn't show up. sorry :dead:

shocky123
09-16-2005, 12:57 AM
I figured they had already calculated the 'design' costs into the per-chip estimate.
It makes complete sense actually..
~$40 in materials....
total cost: ~$40
....I forget somethin? Oh yeah..$0.40/1,000,000chips should cover the cost of the napkin they drew the P-D out on.

~Kyle