Itsme
10-23-2005, 11:40 AM
Apple sued over iPod Nano scratching
By INQUIRER staff: Sunday 23 October 2005, 08:00
A CLASS ACTION started against Apple on the 19th October in a San Jose district court, alleging that the firm released iPod Nanos which easily scratch.
An article in Betanews noticed the action started a few days ago and we have tracked down the filing.
Jason Tomczak kicked off the class action and alleges that because the iPod Nano was defectively designed, the screen on the machines was unreadable and breached state consumer protection statutes.
The plaintiff alleges that although Apple knew there were problems with the design of the Nano, it did not recall the machines but allowed members to buy them and "passed the expense, hassle and frustration of replacing the defectively designed Nanos along to class members".
The filing alleges that Steve Jobs appeared in a TV ad shown removing an iPod nano from his pocket and the plaintiff alleges that means Apple led consumers to believe the machine was durable. But, claims the filing, the Nano screen scratches even when used in its normal manner.
The filing alleges that when Apple designed the Nano, the resin used was not as thick and strong as in previous iPods. The plaintiff alleges that even though Apple knew this before release, "fierce competition on the digital music industry" caused it to release the product anyway.
The filing quotes a number of articles in both The Wall Street Journal and Macworld to substantiate its allegations.
The filing concludes by demanding damages from Apple
By INQUIRER staff: Sunday 23 October 2005, 08:00
A CLASS ACTION started against Apple on the 19th October in a San Jose district court, alleging that the firm released iPod Nanos which easily scratch.
An article in Betanews noticed the action started a few days ago and we have tracked down the filing.
Jason Tomczak kicked off the class action and alleges that because the iPod Nano was defectively designed, the screen on the machines was unreadable and breached state consumer protection statutes.
The plaintiff alleges that although Apple knew there were problems with the design of the Nano, it did not recall the machines but allowed members to buy them and "passed the expense, hassle and frustration of replacing the defectively designed Nanos along to class members".
The filing alleges that Steve Jobs appeared in a TV ad shown removing an iPod nano from his pocket and the plaintiff alleges that means Apple led consumers to believe the machine was durable. But, claims the filing, the Nano screen scratches even when used in its normal manner.
The filing alleges that when Apple designed the Nano, the resin used was not as thick and strong as in previous iPods. The plaintiff alleges that even though Apple knew this before release, "fierce competition on the digital music industry" caused it to release the product anyway.
The filing quotes a number of articles in both The Wall Street Journal and Macworld to substantiate its allegations.
The filing concludes by demanding damages from Apple