PDA

View Full Version : Fatties need not apply



MikeD
10-26-2005, 12:14 PM
While they don't explicitly state that they don't want to hire overweight folks, they do appear to allude to that fact. Wonder if there will be any fallout...


NEW YORK (Reuters) - An internal memo sent to the Wal-Mart Stores Inc. board proposes numerous ways to hold down health care and benefits costs with less harm to the retailer's reputation, including hiring more part-time workers and discouraging unhealthy people from seeking jobs, the New York Times said Wednesday.

The paper said the draft memo to Wal-Mart's board was obtained from Wal-Mart Watch, a pressure group allied with labor unions that says Wal-Mart's pay and benefits are too low.

The paper said in the memorandum Susan Chambers, Wal-Mart's executive vice president for benefits, also recommends reducing 401(k) pension contributions and wooing younger, and presumably healthier, workers by offering education benefits.

The memo is quoted as expressing concern that workers with seven years' seniority earn more than workers with one year's seniority, but are no more productive, said the paper, which posted the memo on its Web site

To discourage unhealthy job applicants, the paper said, Chambers suggests Wal-Mart arrange for "all jobs to include some physical activity (e.g., all cashiers do some cart-gathering),"

The memo also proposed that employees pay more for their spouses' health insurance, called for cutting the company's 401(k) contributions to 3 percent of wages from 4 percent and for cutting company-paid life insurance policies.

The memo acknowledged that Wal-Mart, the world's largest retailer, had to walk a fine line in restraining benefits because critics attacked it for being stingy on wages and health coverage. Chambers in the memo acknowledged 46 percent of the children of Wal-Mart's 1.33 million United States employees were uninsured or on Medicaid.

Wal-Mart executives said the memo was part of an effort to rein in benefit costs, which have soared by 15 percent a year on average since 2002. Like much of corporate America, Wal-Mart has been squeezed by soaring health costs, the paper said.

The proposed plan, if approved, would save the company more than $1 billion a year by 2011, the paper said.

Wal-Mart sets holiday discount program ... click here for more


In an interview, Ms. Chambers said she was focusing not on cutting costs, but on serving employees better by giving them more choices on their benefits. Chambers also said that she made her recommendations after surveying employees about how they felt about the benefits plan.

One proposal would reduce the amount of time, from two years to one, that part-time employees would have to wait before qualifying for health insurance. Another would put health clinics in stores, in part to reduce expensive employee visits to emergency rooms.

Wal-Mart's benefit costs jumped to $4.2 billion last year, from $2.8 billion three years earlier. Last year Wal-Mart earned $10.5 billion on sales of $285 billion.

Under fire because less than 45 percent of its workers receive company health insurance, Wal-Mart announced a new plan Monday that seeks to increase participation by allowing some employees to pay just $11 a month in premiums.

http://money.cnn.com/2005/10/26/news/fortune500/walmart.reut/index.htm?cnn=yes

zippyjuan
10-26-2005, 01:46 PM
They already make it hard for their employees to get health benefits. Last year, the state of California spent about $85 million on healthcare for Walmart employees. And yet the owners of the company are still on the list of the ten wealthiest people in America. I am trying to find a source, but the study that showed this was done by the University of California Berkley.

Grimm
10-26-2005, 01:55 PM
Walmarts are a drain on the economies of the comunities they infest. The workers are paid so poorly they are frequently receiving state assistance. They have been busted for employing illegal labor and for treating women unfairly. They are an example of the worst that corporate America has to offer.

BigJon
10-26-2005, 02:17 PM
Umm..discrimination anyone?

MikeD
10-26-2005, 02:21 PM
The thing I found ironic about the article is that Wal-Mart is most firmly embedded in the South/Southeast US, which also happens to be the fattest part of the country. I believe Texas leads the way there...

Short of these folks being unable to perform their job duties, I don't see where WalMart has a leg to stand on.

Cubsfan
10-26-2005, 02:25 PM
The thing I found ironic about the article is that Wal-Mart is most firmly embedded in the South/Southeast US, which also happens to be the fattest part of the country. I believe Texas leads the way there...

Short of these folks being unable to perform their job duties, I don't see where WalMart has a leg to stand on.
I think that's the point. Change the job duties so you have to be at least marginally healthy to do them. Like they said, make even the checkers get carts.

MikeD
10-26-2005, 02:27 PM
I think that's the point. Change the job duties so you have to be at least marginally healthy to do them. Like they said, make even the checkers get carts.

I hear ya...though I guess my thought was that these are the same folks whom WalMart built their empire on the backs of.

ooBaKeep
10-26-2005, 02:30 PM
Maybe they could take the Mc Donalds out of the store and add a salad bar. :hmm:

thresher
10-27-2005, 09:46 AM
Out of the 50 richest people IN THE WORLD, 8 of them are Waltons*. Their cumulative wealth is greater than that of the bottom 65 countries. They own, I repeat, OWN and control the third largest port in the world. Which they use exclusively to ship products out of China.** We're not helping ourselves when we shop at Wal-f-mart. I have seen them destroy small towns in Texas and Alabama effortlessly for years while folks thought myself and a few others were chicken littles. Now, finally, maybe(?) people are waking up?
*http://www.forbes.com/2005/03/09/bill05land.html
**http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/walmart/
**http://www.walmartmovie.com/

Cubsfan
10-27-2005, 09:51 AM
So why is this such a big deal? Isn't this how insurance works? Smokers get charged more for a lot of insurance. If you're a bad driver, you get charged a bunch for insurance, and may not even be able to get it. If you're a homeowner prone to accidents, you get dropped. The price of insurance is generally based on how likely you are to need it. Shouldn't health insurance be the same... if you're fat and more likely to need a doctor, then you should be charged more.

<Note: I don't necessarily believe this, just thought I'd throw it out there>

cheapie
10-27-2005, 09:56 AM
fyi everyone...IT'S LEGAL TO DISCRIMINATE AS LONG AS IT'S NOT AGAINST A LEGALLY PROTECTED CLASS!!! fat people are not a legally protected group. unless they are fat because of a disability.

Cheesypuff
10-27-2005, 10:21 AM
SCREW WAL-FING-MART!!! it's so hard to get benefits from that place, and now, with this crappy excuse of a reason, they gotta bask in the "american dream" and not help a fellow human! PLUS...THAT FELLOW HUMAN WANTS WORKS FOR THEM!!! I can hear the Wals now..."lets get more money, and F**K over our workers even more" Damn them for screwing society right in the ass.

tupacboy
10-27-2005, 10:31 AM
fyi everyone...IT'S LEGAL TO DISCRIMINATE AS LONG AS IT'S NOT AGAINST A LEGALLY PROTECTED CLASS!!! fat people are not a legally protected group. unless they are fat because of a disability.


they can't stop eating mcdonalds... isn't that a disability?

Grimm
10-27-2005, 10:47 AM
they can't stop eating mcdonalds... isn't that a disability?
Lack of self control is not a disability, it is a character flaw.