PDA

View Full Version : Eureka Teenager First Female Designated "Sexually Dangerous"



guiseppewv
10-27-2005, 02:35 PM
Eureka Teenager First Female Designated "Sexually Dangerous"
Oct. 26, 2005 - Woodford County
Monica Landeros

“Sexually dangerous,” that’s what a Woodford County teenager is being labeled by the State of Illinois. She's also the first female in the state with that designation. 17-year old Tammy Wheeler of Eureka has been designated “sexually dangerous” after being charged with fondling two young boys earlier this year.

According to Woodford County Court documents Wheeler admitted to fondling other children before that incident. The documents say she suffers from posttraumatic stress disorder from physical and sexual abuse in her childhood, and has uncontrollable sexual urges.

State's Attorney Mike Stroh says during interviews Wheeler said she would continue to molest children.

“The fact is that she indicated to the doctor, and I believe the police as well, that she would commit this offense if she was given the opportunity to do that. She indicated that she had an uncontrollable urge, and that was something that caused us great concern,” said Woodford County State’s Attorney Mike Stroh.

Stroh also says the “sexually dangerous” designation assures that Wheeler will get the counseling she needs, and will not be released from the Department of Corrections anytime soon.

Wheeler is being held at the Dwight Correctional Center. It is not yet known which state facility she will be sent to for long-term treatment.


http://www.hoinews.com/home/headlines/1822851.html

InfiniteNothing
10-27-2005, 02:38 PM
I wonder what her sentence was. We also need a mugshot so that we may make rude comments as to whether we want her to be dangerous with us.

will_dou
10-27-2005, 04:19 PM
Lol, am I hearing you and understanding you right Infinite? Or I'm just imagining :P?

DaFunkyUnit
10-27-2005, 05:02 PM
back when I was in middle school, girls would always grab my ass. it was quite embarrassing.

JackHammer
10-27-2005, 05:23 PM
Let me be the first to directly say that TTIWWOP.

MikeD
10-27-2005, 06:10 PM
TTIWWOP.

For those in the dark...:spock:

This Thread Is Worthless WithOut Pics

Mommypooh
10-27-2005, 10:44 PM
Thank you! MikeD it is 1:30 in the am too early to try to figure that out for me.

NAK

Nija
10-27-2005, 11:00 PM
I'd hit it. :heh:

/kidding
//unless she is hot
///phear the slashy!

eSDee
10-27-2005, 11:17 PM
Sexually dangerous is kind of a harsh term for mentally ill. She definitely needs help.

zippyjuan
10-28-2005, 12:03 AM
They can't show a picture since she is underaged. If she was male and two years older, she would be called a sexual predator and her picture would be all over the place.

cheapchinese
10-28-2005, 04:39 AM
what wrong with girls having sex? :confused:

i'm cool with it :P

nickel
10-28-2005, 05:20 AM
Sexually dangerous is kind of a harsh term for mentally ill. She definitely needs help.
i saw this article posted on another board and guys were complaining that she wasn't labelled a pedophile, and thought labelling her "sexually dangerous" was giving her a break. :hmm:

nickel
10-28-2005, 05:21 AM
what wrong with girls having sex? :confused:

i'm cool with it :P
did you read the article?

MikeD
10-28-2005, 05:56 AM
Thank you! MikeD it is 1:30 in the am too early to try to figure that out for me.

NAK

:thumbup:

I know the feeling...

mcs328
10-28-2005, 08:44 AM
For those in the dark...:spock:

This Thread Is Worthless WithOut Pics

Thanks...I read it as titty-whop

dougadam
10-29-2005, 03:49 PM
Sexually dangerous is kind of a harsh term for mentally ill. She definitely needs help.

She might need to be put in an institution.

:abduct: