PDA

View Full Version : Readers choose the least-loved American auto



Itsme
11-23-2005, 06:21 AM
Readers choose the least-loved American auto
Selection of the best comments on turkey cars from MSNBC.com readers

The Chevrolet Vega, a popular choice of MSNBC.com readers for the 'turkey' car of all time.

Identifying the worst automobile ever made can be a staggering task — after all, there are so many cars to choose from, and one driver’s lemon on wheels is another’s dream ride. But when MSNBC.com asked its readers to name their least-loved car, one name stood head and shoulders above the rest — the Chevy Vega.

What was it about the Vega that struck a chord with so many of our readers? Was it the car’s unsightly appearance, or its collection of highly-publicized design defects, which led to carburetor fires, an overheating engine and premature body rust?

Below is a selection of the e-mails we’ve received on this topic. Many reader comments were from car owners detailing their troubles with specific car models, while others reflected on what they see as the decline of the U.S. automotive industry. Some reader comments have been edited for length and clarity.

Detroit’s early attempts at small economy cars in the wake of the first gas spike in the early 70s were spectacular busts: The Chevy Vega, the Ford Pinto, the AMC Pacer, the Dodge Horizon and the AMC Gremlin. Either of the AMC cars were probably the worst overall quality of the lot. There were jokes about parts falling off and windows leaking all the time. But everyone my age remembers the exploding Pintos and the aluminum block Vegas who usually didn’t last past 60,000 miles.
—David Genther, Grand Rapids, Mich.

For me, the worst car ever made was the Chevrolet Vega. It had a great design for the time, but GM made a huge mistake with the engine. Instead of going with a V-4 aluminum block with steel sleeves in the cylinders, they started with half of a V-8 block to cut costs, but this proved very inefficient compared to imports. When GM finally went to the aluminum block, they used the wrong pistons that ate up the cylinders. By the time GM figured out how to do it right, the reputations of the Vega and GM were seriously damaged.
—Pamela Simone, Frederick, Md.

The Chevy Vega is the worst car ever made, followed closely by the Ford Pinto. The Vega was a great idea, with an engine that was ahead of its time. Unfortunately, the manufacture of the engine was years behind the design. So the car was a miserable failure. The Pinto was just a rotten design, dictated by Iacocca's short-sighted management and the even more myopic bean counters who squeezed out every extra cent, and left the car a rolling firetrap.
—Thom Moon, Cincinnati, Ohio

The 1972 Chevrolet Vega was by far the worst car ever made. Unfortunately, it was my first car, and I was so proud of it ... for about 6 months.
After 20,000 miles of gentle driving, it needed a valve job, and possibly a new engine, a new clutch, a new transmission sync gear and new tires. The Vega was incredibly slow, loud, and stuffy (the air circulation was awful). The gear spacing was all wrong. And the handling was horrendous — even dangerous, especially on wet roads. What was good about the car? My hatchback looked great. That’s it. I still think Chevrolet should refund the $2,499.95 I paid for that car. What an injustice to a good kid who just wanted to show off his car!
—Bob Eicholz, Hollywood, Calif.

The first car I ever owned was a brand new, beautiful Ford Mustang -- it was also the worst car I ever owned. In Pennsylvania, you have to get your car inspected every year. My new Ford Mustang did not pass inspection. When I returned the car for repairs I felt ignored and would get it back with the same problems. It broke down constantly. Before it reached 100,000 miles the engine froze and I had to have it rebuilt. I just bought a new 2005 Honda Accord and I love it! It has an onboard computer with GPS and voice commands. My husband has an old Toyota that is 16 years old and has over 300,000 miles on it!
—Pamela Butler, Los Angeles, Calif.

DarkFury
11-23-2005, 07:24 AM
Though I never had a Vega.... from the sounds of the stories above, I can see why it was the worst.

Generally my votes would go to the Gremlin (appropriately named of course), the Pacer, the Pinto, and the Yugo.

kgsilvas
11-23-2005, 07:46 AM
Guess people who hated the Edsel didn't submit to this poll.

How about the Corvair. It was "unsafe at any speed" and truly a rolling death trap. Mom used to drive us around in a old used one when we were kids.

ribitch
11-23-2005, 08:44 AM
yugo isnt an american auto :D

DarkFury
11-23-2005, 08:57 AM
yugo isnt an american auto :D
I know... but it was SOOOOO bad I just had to include it.


Honestly, it barely qualifies as an "auto"... more like a go cart with a body kit. :heh:

johnnymk
11-23-2005, 09:26 AM
I had a '72 Vega. I liked the styling and it was a blast to drive.

The guy who had it before me replaced the original engine and I put in two more. It was a rust bucket but I still have fond memories of it.

sizemic1
11-25-2005, 07:38 AM
I still think the Pontiac Aztek is the most disturbing car ever made.

DarkFury
11-25-2005, 07:51 AM
I still think the Pontiac Aztek is the most disturbing car ever made.
Actually, on the "inside" it is quite nice... but most of us just can't past that UGLY exterior....


WTH were they thinking!!!! :eek:

thresher
11-28-2005, 06:44 AM
"I still think the Pontiac Aztek is the most disturbing car ever made."
here here!

Jihforce
11-28-2005, 10:06 AM
Looks like GM is very good making crappy cars.

DarkFury
11-28-2005, 10:09 AM
Looks like GM is very good making crappy cars.
On the "low end" of the scale... I'd have to agree with you.

However, with GM... things seem to get BETTER as you go UP the line or to the "higher" divisions (i.e. GMC, Cadillac, and American General).

Jihforce
11-28-2005, 10:12 AM
I almost feel like they use the leftovers to make their low-end cars. I have yet to see a solid GM priced under 20k.

DarkFury
11-28-2005, 10:33 AM
I almost feel like they use the leftovers to make their low-end cars. I have yet to see a solid GM priced under 20k.
The Saturns are not too bad... they're just "too small" in my opinion.

Jihforce
11-28-2005, 01:44 PM
The Saturns are not too bad... they're just "too small" in my opinion.

the new saturns might be ok. but i still wouldn't touch them. from what i read a while back, their VUE use honda made engines, so i don't know how much GM there really is in those cars.

Realrammstein
11-29-2005, 12:55 PM
I know... but it was SOOOOO bad I just had to include it.


Honestly, it barely qualifies as an "auto"... more like a go cart with a body kit. :heh:

I see an Asian girl driving a *mint* Yugo in Foster city. Her boyfriend drives a BMW and I can see them at the park. All I can say is I have never seen him get into her car :D

DarkFury
11-29-2005, 01:22 PM
the new saturns might be ok. but i still wouldn't touch them. from what i read a while back, their VUE use honda made engines, so i don't know how much GM there really is in those cars.
As long as they slap their name on the outside... it's their car.


Hell... Furd used to slap "Yamaha engines" into its cars... nobody said nothing. It happens. :shrug:

Personally I wouldn't touch em because they aren't the right car for me. However many here have already approved of their "Sky" roadster design.

http://www.gotapex.com/forums/showthread.php?t=90375

Captain Video
11-30-2005, 08:25 AM
I remember the old Fords. They were always lousey. Anyone remember the Galaxy rust bucket? Found On Road Dead.