PDA

View Full Version : For him, a new wife; for her, a new trial



PoorAvatar
03-18-2006, 07:51 PM
Rusty Yates remarries days before ex-wife's murder retrial

Rusty Yates and Laura Arnold after their wedding Saturday at Clear Lake Church of Christ, where they met.
HOUSTON, Texas (AP) -- Rusty Yates remarried Saturday in the church where the funeral for his five children was held and less than two days before his ex-wife's murder retrial was to begin.

Yates married Laura Arnold, 41, during a private ceremony attended by 100 people at Clear Lake Church of Christ, where they met.

The church minister said Yates chose to move on with his life while resisting temptation to pity himself or seek revenge on people who may have wronged him.

"It is easy to judge the actions of another, as though we know all the intricate details of their life story. Jesus has warned us against such judgments," minister Byron Fike said in his prepared statement. He took no questions.

Yates divorced Andrea Yates in March 2005, three years after she was sentenced to life in prison on two murder convictions for drowning her children in a bathtub. An appeals court overturned those convictions based on mistaken testimony by a psychiatrist.

Psychiatrists in her original trial testified Andrea Yates suffered from schizophrenia and postpartum depression, but disagreed over the severity of her illnesses and whether she knew her actions were wrong.

She is again pleading insanity at her retrial. A request to delay the trial until summer is due to be heard before the trial starts Monday. (Full story)

Rusty Yates returned home from work in June 2001 to learn his wife had drowned their five children. Noah, John, Paul, Luke and Mary, ages 7 years to 6 months, were found laid out on a bed or in the bathtub

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/03/18/yates.husband.ap/index.html

Shouldn't he have been held accountable for something! Yes, I don't know every little detail, no one does unless you lived with them, but he knew she was diagnosed w/postpartum depression after the fourth baby and before the fifth but left her at home with all the kids and went to work and now to see this picture just turns my stomach :mad: IMO he knew how serious things were and did nothing.

Daedalus
03-18-2006, 09:44 PM
That's a tough call. He wasn't found to have done anything criminal. A lot of women have post-partum depression. A lot of couples have rough spots in their marriages. I assume he was leaving her at home and going to work in order to take care of his family in the best way he could. I don't think it's fair to say he should have known enough to have prevented the murders. Who would suspect their spouse would be capable of what she did?
I don't know what point the article was trying to make regarding the church and the timing of his wedding. He's a member of a particular church's congregation. Is he supposed to go to a different church to get married from the one he held the funerals for his kids? As far as the timing of the wedding and the retrial, that's probably mere coincidence. The wedding date was probably set first.

PoorAvatar
03-19-2006, 06:47 AM
Those are good points.

Yes, he went to work everyday to take care of his family. His wife stayed home with 5 young kids. If his wife worked at a preschool with 5 kids someone would have been required to relieve her for breaks, lunch, etc. Why didn't he provide/require someone to come & help her, maybe from the church.

Let's say she refused help (and this is where I find him accountable), he had to have known her mental condition was deteriorating and if he didn't he's accountable for that. I have a hard time believing that at the end of the day this guy exhausted every possible avenue.

welfareloser
03-19-2006, 08:42 AM
i have a hard time believeing that at the end of the day i would have acted any differently than rusty yates if it was my spouse who looked like hell but insisted he was okay :shrug:

gwilks98
03-19-2006, 09:53 AM
check this out:

http://abcnews.go.com/US/LegalCenter/wireStory?id=1656353

welfareloser
03-19-2006, 11:00 AM
seen it. hard to say if a crazy person's testimony against another crazy person is worth a squirt.

back to the original point, tho... it is rather horrifying that he's just going to mosey on with his life and she doesn't get to... i can't propose any legal action that is better, tho.

Memo
03-19-2006, 12:33 PM
seen it. hard to say if a crazy person's testimony against another crazy person is worth a squirt.

back to the original point, tho... it is rather horrifying that he's just going to mosey on with his life and she doesn't get to... i can't propose any legal action that is better, tho.

How is this horrifying? The bitch is a baby killer. It's going to be hard enough to just "mosey on with his life" after his first wife murdered their children. I don't see how anyone can put blame on him for what happened. Sure he knew his wife was in a bad state but how many husbands are going to think of their wives as capable of killing their offspring?

Freelance Superhero
03-19-2006, 08:48 PM
How is this horrifying? The bitch is a baby killer. It's going to be hard enough to just "mosey on with his life" after his first wife murdered their children. I don't see how anyone can put blame on him for what happened. Sure he knew his wife was in a bad state but how many husbands are going to think of their wives as capable of killing their offspring?:stupid:
i don't know all the intricacies of post-partum depression and whatnot, but i'm really not seeing how any of this could be pinned on the husband regardless.