View Full Version : Why is GAM anonymous?
Airencracken
05-17-2006, 11:12 AM
I've never liked it myself, I've never thought it was a good idea. Especially since there are multiple GAMs.
InfiniteNothing
05-17-2006, 11:14 AM
To seem impartial.
MikeD
05-17-2006, 11:15 AM
They should outsource the GAM position. Posting members should not be GAMs. :shrug:
InfiniteNothing
05-17-2006, 11:18 AM
There are some posts out there that you just can't not comment on.
MikeD
05-17-2006, 11:19 AM
There are some posts out there that you just can't not comment on.
That's exactly my point. There are numerous topics GAMs want to discuss. Therefore, outsource the GAM position so that these members can participate.
johnnymk
05-17-2006, 11:19 AM
There are some posts out there that you just can't not comment on.
can't not = can
InfiniteNothing
05-17-2006, 11:21 AM
That's exactly my point. There are numerous topics GAMs want to discuss. Therefore, outsource the GAM position so that these members can participate.
But then that GAM will want to post. I believe the position pays nothing.
DaFunkyUnit
05-17-2006, 12:27 PM
That's exactly my point. There are numerous topics GAMs want to discuss. Therefore, outsource the GAM position so that these members can participate.
what? whats stopping the GAM(s) from creating a new user account to use to make regular posts? (which I believe is what they do)
MikeD
05-17-2006, 12:42 PM
Ehh, I'm not being clear: the GAM should be a non-interested 3rd party. Someone who has no interest in involving themselves in the conversations posted here. It's the only way that they can remain neutral in the monitoring of the board.
DarkFury
05-17-2006, 12:43 PM
GAM is anonymous so that multiple people can fulfill the role yet you can't single out which person actually performed what action (especially when you disagree with the action). Therefore under their "regular" screen names they can live normal lives in the forums without worrying about folks making comments to their personal posts versus their official posts.
In other words, if you don't know which one did it... you can't persecute the individuals who have the authority to do it when they are on their personal accounts.
This is most likely why GAM is anonymous.
brainsmile
05-17-2006, 12:50 PM
I choose to be anonymous :D but I'm not GAM
oblongmelon
05-17-2006, 01:09 PM
Ehh, I'm not being clear: the GAM should be a non-interested 3rd party. Someone who has no interest in involving themselves in the conversations posted here. It's the only way that they can remain neutral in the monitoring of the board.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahah..Like THAT is ever going to happen..
LegendKiller
05-17-2006, 01:27 PM
Here's a great idea. Why don't you guys pay Apex money so he can hire an independant GAM company. That way, when you guys b!tch about impariality, the hired GAM can say "I am just doing my job".
Part of the problem with the GAM account is that people will twist intentions of GAM to whatever agenda they see fit. Even if GAM were to be a posting member AND recuse themselves from specific topics while being GAM, they are still accused of NOT recusing themselves in the case of conflict of interests.
This is the true irony of GAM, no matter what, he/she is screwed. Thus, if you guys want to pin the tail on GAM *AND* it be impartial, then pay for a GAM yourself so you can have your own pinata.
GAM remains anonymous in an attempt to remove accusations of impartiality and reprisals against *VOLUNTEERS*, which has obviously failed miserably because people are selfish and want to tear people down to suit their own needs and agendas.
MikeD
05-17-2006, 01:56 PM
Here's a great idea. Why don't you guys pay Apex money so he can hire an independant GAM company. That way, when you guys b!tch about impariality, the hired GAM can say "I am just doing my job".
Deal. Bring back Pol and forward where you want the money sent.
Part of the problem with the GAM account is that people will twist intentions of GAM to whatever agenda they see fit. Even if GAM were to be a posting member AND recuse themselves from specific topics while being GAM, they are still accused of NOT recusing themselves in the case of conflict of interests.
This is the true irony of GAM, no matter what, he/she is screwed. Thus, if you guys want to pin the tail on GAM *AND* it be impartial, then pay for a GAM yourself so you can have your own pinata.
GAM remains anonymous in an attempt to remove accusations of impartiality and reprisals against *VOLUNTEERS*, which has obviously failed miserably because people are selfish and want to tear people down to suit their own needs and agendas.
It's a matter of opinion. Some thought the GAM wasn't being impartial. You, being a GAM, well I'm sure you thought things were impartial. :shrug:
Bring on the outsourced GAMs. Again, where do you want that $$$ sent?
LegendKiller
05-17-2006, 02:19 PM
Deal. Bring back Pol and forward where you want the money sent.
It's a matter of opinion. Some thought the GAM wasn't being impartial. You, being a GAM, well I'm sure you thought things were impartial. :shrug:
Bring on the outsourced GAMs. Again, where do you want that $$$ sent?
lets get something straight. duringmy tenure, I never modded a pol thread, anybody who I had issues with, and I stuck to stuff where people used derogatory language or posted spam.
furthermore, I don't know who spoke of me being gam, as I never told anybody, I have my suspcions, but that is all. the person who did it, and people like you, who used it as a tool of the selfish, only disgusted me and made me decide thaty contributions to this sitewew no longer appreciated. as such, I took my reviewing elsewhere.
your accusations are disgusting, insulting, and demeaning. if you wonder why gam is anonymous, or people to fill it are ahrd to find, go look in the mirror.
I never asked or received anything from this site, other than to improve content in deal postings and reviews and for others to respect my opinions. I accepted gam reluctantly and rarely used it. to infer anything else is wrong.
you wonder why I am disgusted by some people here? its because you will stoop to the lowest levels to get your way.
avlena
05-17-2006, 02:25 PM
Deal. Bring back Pol and forward where you want the money sent.
It's a matter of opinion. Some thought the GAM wasn't being impartial. You, being a GAM, well I'm sure you thought things were impartial. :shrug:
Bring on the outsourced GAMs. Again, where do you want that $$$ sent?
get over it. you want to run the forums, then go create your own. The site is called got|apex... Apex runs it and he can run it however he wants. No one is making you participate; if you don't like it, then go find another forum community.
:shrug: no one can be completely impartial, the GAMs are human. They're just doing their jobs, and trying the best they can to keep things decent. We don't know what's going on behind the scenes, or their line of thinking.
clutchy
05-17-2006, 02:29 PM
I've never liked it myself, I've never thought it was a good idea. Especially since there are multiple GAMs.
you must have missed that political thead where i brought this very question up... it REALLY bothers me to have anonymous moderators. I also went on a tirade and called them a gestapo fascist regime or something and was "accidently banned" for doing so.
MikeD
05-17-2006, 02:31 PM
lets get something straight. duringmy tenure, I never modded a pol thread, anybody who I had issues with, and I stuck to stuff where people used derogatory language or posted spam.
furthermore, I don't know who spoke of me being gam, as I never told anybody, I have my suspcions, but that is all. the person who did it, and people like you, who used it as a tool of the selfish, only disgusted me and made me decide thaty contributions to this sitewew no longer appreciated. as such, I took my reviewing elsewhere.
your accusations are disgusting, insulting, and demeaning. if you wonder why gam is anonymous, or people to fill it are ahrd to find, go look in the mirror.
I never asked or received anything from this site, other than to improve content in deal postings and reviews and for others to respect my opinions. I accepted gam reluctantly and rarely used it. to infer anything else is wrong.
you wonder why I am disgusted by some people here? its because you will stoop to the lowest levels to get your way.
LK: calm down a bit bro. Tell me where I ever said you in particular were impartial.
I don't know who the GAMs are. And as for you being a GAM, well I thought it was insinuated in this thread: http://forums.gotapex.com/showthread.php?t=98399. Again, I don't know for sure. It could be any number of people who post here. Yeah, we all have our suspicions. But that's exactly what they are...suspicions only.
With that being said, maybe you should re-read what you posted. I'm disgusting? My "accusations" are disgusting? For Christ sakes man, read the thread! I'm simply saying it would be better for all, INCLUDING THE GAMs, if they were neutral third parties.
That type of flying off the handle is what's truly disgusting.
BTW, note my comment from the thread I linked above:
I disagreed with a whole rack of the guy's posts, but I hate to see him disappear like this.
You think that's some BS I'm spewing? If so, hey...you're entitled to your opinion. Just check it before you go flying off the handle again.
Do you know what would happen if people found out I was GAM?
oblongmelon
05-17-2006, 02:42 PM
Do you know what would happen if people found out I was GAM?
more rainbows?
riskykougra
05-17-2006, 02:59 PM
By reading some of the personal attacks..for lack of a better phrase...in this thread and the another one I can see why anyone who is willing to volunteer to be a GAM would wish to remain anonymous.
more rainbows?
No, probably more related to somewhere the sun don't shine.
more rainbows?
More Cowbell!
sourdough
05-17-2006, 06:09 PM
I don't know who the GAMs are. And as for you being a GAM, well I thought it was insinuated in this thread: http://forums.gotapex.com/showthread.php?t=98399. Again, I don't know for sure. It could be any number of people who post here. Yeah, we all have our suspicions. But that's exactly what they are...suspicions only.
There have been rumors that I am a GAM.
DarkFury
05-17-2006, 08:31 PM
GAM remains anonymous in an attempt to remove accusations of impartiality and reprisals against *VOLUNTEERS*, which has obviously failed miserably because people are selfish and want to tear people down to suit their own needs and agendas.
Heh.. I guess that's another way of saying what I said earlier :D
-------------------------------
Gotta love the new Avatar Apex has chosen...
Dayuuum... has it gotten that bad yet? By the looks of threads like these... I suppose that it has. :2far:
Markel
05-17-2006, 08:45 PM
GAM remains anonymous in an attempt to remove accusations of impartiality and reprisals against *VOLUNTEERS* ...
What??? Someone has gone so far as to accuse GAM of being impartial??? HOW DARE THEY!!!!
;)
ialsohaveadream
05-17-2006, 09:08 PM
What??? Someone has gone so far as to accuse GAM of being impartial??? HOW DARE THEY!!!!
;)
GAM is an unbiased bastard! And dispassionate, too, that guy. :disa:
AlpineJay
05-17-2006, 11:02 PM
And dispassionate, too, that guy. :disa:
yeah! he toyed with my emotions by leading me on and never PMed me back.
BigJon
05-18-2006, 04:12 AM
I just love how everything turns into a huge fight! :rolleyes:
nickel
05-18-2006, 04:40 AM
get over it. you want to run the forums, then go create your own. The site is called got|apex... Apex runs it and he can run it however he wants. No one is making you participate; if you don't like it, then go find another forum community.
that's a total "America, love it or leave it" mentality. it's not so awful to think that if there are unresolved issues here that we shouldn't ask questions and expect answers.
that's a total "America, love it or leave it" mentality. it's not so awful to think that if there are unresolved issues here that we shouldn't ask questions and expect answers.
Does complaining about every little thing actually help resolve issues? It's not a love it or leave it mentality. It's more people complaining for the sake of complaining and aggravating those who still enjoy the forums for what they are.
Some of you say that the Political Forums drove traffic here. I would love to see how many "veteran" posters left the boards when the Political Forums were first introduced.
faither
05-18-2006, 10:08 AM
I don't remember anyone leaving the site after introduction of the PF and would be confused if anyone had. Its creation was effectively a value added that helped eliminate much of the political discussion that was occurring in the OT forum. It was probably helpful to those who were sick of seeing political issues discussed in this forum.
It looks like intentionally or not we're back where we started (with some additional censorship tossed in). :winkie:
bagel
05-18-2006, 10:11 AM
There have been rumors that I am a GAM.
It is rumored that all us Tasty Delights are a GAM.
avlena
05-18-2006, 11:28 AM
that's a total "America, love it or leave it" mentality. it's not so awful to think that if there are unresolved issues here that we shouldn't ask questions and expect answers.
It's one thing to make helpful suggestions to improve a situation, it's another thing to whine like a bunch of brats about how awful things are, how mean people are being to you, and you could run things better, blah blah blah. (not trying to make a personal attack by using the pronoun "you", i'm actually making a general statement about the types of posts I've seen lately in the past few weeks)
If you want to change something (in america, in a company, in your relationship, whatever), you can't just bitch about how awful the authority figure is, and expect that to be taken as constructive. If you really want to change, then start making rational suggestions.
And if someone tells you no... well, it's not your site, so too bad. Last I checked, there is no law that g|a has to be fair.
Houdini
05-18-2006, 11:54 AM
By reading some of the personal attacks..for lack of a better phrase...in this thread and the another one I can see why anyone who is willing to volunteer to be a GAM would wish to remain anonymous.
:stupid:
nickel
05-18-2006, 12:09 PM
nm
Maarchk
05-19-2006, 02:23 PM
It is rumored that all us Tasty Delights are a GAM.
I wondered why my habitual toast burning post was deleted...
Why is it bad to have a Gam who is many. I would imagine it helps keep them consistent in that, one Gam won't hate you because he won't have to regulate on every post one makes. Granter people may call strikes and balls differently, but hey its just like the real world. one boss thinks its ok to talk Lakers at the water cooler, and the other doesn't.
They are willing to step in and do the dirty work when no one else has stepped up and volunteered. If truly we were to want a political forum, perhaps we would need everyone to moderate and say that you must moderate a thread for every 5 posts you make. I think that would have all of us reading a lot more and understanding how hard it can be to act impartial towards everyone. Cause no matter what call you make, you'll always bother someone. Just like being a referee.
Personallly I think the GAM's do fine, but i can understand their frustrations. We do play like kids in a sandbox some days.
Devhux
05-19-2006, 03:21 PM
*sigh* Ever since the PF forum closed, there's been so much drama on these boards -- which was the reason I never visited said forum in the first place. :(
It is what it is -- and since Apex runs the site, he can run it any way he chooses. I'm just so sick of coming to Off-Topic every day and seeing 2-3 new posts about how bad the forum is being moderated.
sizemic1
05-19-2006, 03:48 PM
http://www.raymondkwan.com/uploader2/files/sizemic1/deargod_stop.jpg
Jenny
05-19-2006, 03:55 PM
Maybe it's just me but I think it's calmed down considerably in the last 2 days... lol
Maybe it's just me but I think it's calmed down considerably in the last 2 days... lol
oh shut it jenny. your fantasy football team still sucks!
you'd better play this year!
:king:
Jenny
05-19-2006, 06:34 PM
oh shut it jenny. your fantasy football team still sucks!
you'd better play this year!
:king:
HAHA :P
MikeD
05-20-2006, 06:54 AM
oh shut it jenny. your fantasy football team still sucks!
you'd better play this year!
:king:
:stupid:
Sorry Jenny, :pfft: couldn't resist. Looking forward to G/A League '06!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.