[Log In ] [New Posts] []
Go Back   GotApex? Forums Forums > General Topics > Automotive & Transportation
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-17-2008, 09:41 PM   #1
renovation
Admiral
 
renovation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: You could pick up Lindsay Lohan for less than a intel 990x, and still have money left over to bail her outta jail
Posts: 5,029
Send a message via ICQ to renovation Send a message via MSN to renovation
Eek I Hate it When that Happens!


seem the plane came down short of the runway . they dont know yet if it was pilot error or not.
Timothy Crowch, an aviation analyst with 35 years of experience as a commercial pilot, said the landing gear punched through both wings, indicating a "massive vertical impact." That suggests a total loss of engine power may have been the cause, he said.
(come on it landed in the grass. before it came to rest on the end of the runway ).

"If it had landed 200 meters (656 feet) shorter than it did, it may have hit perimeter fence and obviously some other buildings and the car park, clearly we would be dealing with fatalities and obvious damage," Cullemore said.
http://apnews.excite.com/article/200...D8U7SGDO0.html
__________________
You could pick up Lindsay Lohan for less than a intel 990x, and still have money left over to bail her outta jail
renovation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 05:53 AM   #2
Jeffbx
Fleet Admiral
 
Jeffbx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,390
Send a message via MSN to Jeffbx
Holy cow, that's a 777 - that's a huge plane. I'll be very interested to see if that was human error or mechanical failure.
Jeffbx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 11:00 AM   #3
Markel
Chief of Naval Operations
 
Markel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 11,733
They are reporting that both engines failed less than 500 feet above the runway - probably falls in the "pilot's worst nightmare" category.

http://timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article3212081.ece
__________________
stay low... keep moving...
Markel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 11:14 AM   #4
cheapie
Chief of Naval Operations
 
cheapie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: raising my pimp hand strong
Posts: 13,038
Send a message via AIM to cheapie
well, it's probably not as bad as failing 1000 feet above the runway. ;-)
__________________
70% of the world is covered by water. The rest is covered by Bob Sanders
cheapie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 11:22 AM   #5
Airencracken
Admiral
 
Airencracken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: California
Posts: 6,681
Both engines failing on a 777? That sounds like poor maintenance. Of course the report didn't state what kind of engines were on it, but a common choice is GE. I'd like to see a more thorough investigation before passing too much judgment.
__________________
"I remember my first orgasm, I just wish someone was there to share it with me..."11-05-2003 05:33 AM - Topane
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin
Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, & the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opiate of the masses. - Karl Marx
Hell is other people - Jean-Paul Sartre


Last edited by Airencracken : 01-18-2008 at 11:27 AM.
Airencracken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 11:23 AM   #6
cheapie
Chief of Naval Operations
 
cheapie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: raising my pimp hand strong
Posts: 13,038
Send a message via AIM to cheapie
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markel
They are reporting that both engines failed less than 500 feet above the runway - probably falls in the "pilot's worst nightmare" category.

http://timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article3212081.ece


the title of the article is hilarious!

Quote:
Co-pilot Coward the real hero, says BA crash pilot

the co-pilot's name is John Coward
cheapie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 02:16 PM   #7
renovation
Admiral
 
renovation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: You could pick up Lindsay Lohan for less than a intel 990x, and still have money left over to bail her outta jail
Posts: 5,029
Send a message via ICQ to renovation Send a message via MSN to renovation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Airencracken
Both engines failing on a 777? That sounds like poor maintenance. Of course the report didn't state what kind of engines were on it, but a common choice is GE. I'd like to see a more thorough investigation before passing too much judgment.
they were rolls royce engines per tv news cast i watched last night !
renovation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 04:33 PM   #8
mechmike0034
aka the keg killer
 
mechmike0034's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ala-effin'-bama!
Posts: 2,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markel
They are reporting that both engines failed less than 500 feet above the runway

That would be a good solid 16 on the 1 to 10 "pucker factor" scale...
__________________
"The price of progress is trouble." (C. F. "Boss" Kettering)
"50% of the American public has below-average intelligence. 70% of the American public now has regular access to the Internet. Do the math." (unknown)
mechmike0034 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2008, 03:56 PM   #9
Chgoman
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 696
I was sitting at LAX waiting for a plane to Mexico when they were showing that footage on the TV's. Hey look, a plane crash, oh, it's time to board...
Chgoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:42 PM.