[Log In ] [New Posts] []
Go Back   GotApex? Forums Forums > General Topics > Automotive & Transportation
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-15-2009, 11:54 AM   #1
attgig
Chief of Naval Operations
 
attgig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the ghetto's of bawlmo'
Posts: 11,474
Send a message via ICQ to attgig Send a message via AIM to attgig Send a message via MSN to attgig Send a message via Yahoo to attgig
Cash for Clunkers passed!!!

I wish i didn't fix my jeep. I could've pocketed my insurance check and just traded it in.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/...clunkers_N.htm


http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/...rs_N.htm#chart

no longer question mark...

passed by congress
http://money.cnn.com/2009/06/19/news/economy/cash_for_clunkers/index.htm?postversion=2009061915
__________________


Last edited by attgig : 06-19-2009 at 02:31 PM.
attgig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 08:25 AM   #2
Prngr44
Rear Admiral Lower Half
 
Prngr44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 2,226
Send a message via AIM to Prngr44 Send a message via Yahoo to Prngr44
Would this be on top of any trade-in the dealer gave you for your vehicle?
__________________
http://otthouse.blogspot.com
Prngr44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 09:43 AM   #3
VTGreg
Rear Admiral Lower Half
 
VTGreg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prngr44
Would this be on top of any trade-in the dealer gave you for your vehicle?

Yes. I believe the only caveats are that you have to have owned the car for more than a year, it has to be a certain age and that it gets better gas mileage (money back depends on how much better the gas mileage is).

The bill is really a joke. All it will do is spur new car sales. I imagine there will be negligible impact on fuel efficiency since the stringent fuel requirements were removed so the bill would get passed. Just another $4B drop in the bucket.
__________________
It only ends once... Anything that happens before that is just progress.

Courage is not the absence of fear but rather the judgment that something else is more important than fear.
VTGreg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 11:55 AM   #4
Prngr44
Rear Admiral Lower Half
 
Prngr44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 2,226
Send a message via AIM to Prngr44 Send a message via Yahoo to Prngr44
Interesting... I'd only get 3500 off going from 17 to 19 but that's damn tempting.
Prngr44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 12:20 PM   #5
attgig
Chief of Naval Operations
 
attgig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the ghetto's of bawlmo'
Posts: 11,474
Send a message via ICQ to attgig Send a message via AIM to attgig Send a message via MSN to attgig Send a message via Yahoo to attgig
Quote:
Originally Posted by VTGreg
Yes. I believe the only caveats are that you have to have owned the car for more than a year, it has to be a certain age and that it gets better gas mileage (money back depends on how much better the gas mileage is).

The bill is really a joke. All it will do is spur new car sales. I imagine there will be negligible impact on fuel efficiency since the stringent fuel requirements were removed so the bill would get passed. Just another $4B drop in the bucket.


are you sure it's on top of? from what i read, i thought it was the value of the trade in = 3500/4500. and that's a check that govt gives straight to dealer as part of downpayment.
attgig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 12:30 PM   #6
InfiniteNothing
Fleet Admiral
 
InfiniteNothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,993
Right. There's no trade in. The car gets cubed. Otherwise getting a higher MPG car wouldn't really help as the old car would still exist.
__________________
As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals.
InfiniteNothing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 01:34 PM   #7
VTGreg
Rear Admiral Lower Half
 
VTGreg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by attgig
are you sure it's on top of? from what i read, i thought it was the value of the trade in = 3500/4500. and that's a check that govt gives straight to dealer as part of downpayment.

Hmmm.... Completely missed that part of it.
VTGreg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 08:17 AM   #8
Prngr44
Rear Admiral Lower Half
 
Prngr44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 2,226
Send a message via AIM to Prngr44 Send a message via Yahoo to Prngr44
Damn!
Prngr44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 09:23 AM   #9
attgig
Chief of Naval Operations
 
attgig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the ghetto's of bawlmo'
Posts: 11,474
Send a message via ICQ to attgig Send a message via AIM to attgig Send a message via MSN to attgig Send a message via Yahoo to attgig
who knows. the bill may never pass. hopefully it does soon. My mom's 1999 continental would be a perfect trade in for this
attgig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2009, 07:11 AM   #10
guiseppewv
Admiral
 
guiseppewv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,922
Quote:
Originally Posted by attgig
who knows. the bill may never pass. hopefully it does soon. My mom's 1999 continental would be a perfect trade in for this

Did you check the site they use for the fuel efficiency ratings? My friend's Olds Delta 88 (or was it a 98) from 1988 did not cut the muster on the fuel efficiency rating. The govt site said it had a combined fuel efficiency of 20 mpg.
guiseppewv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2009, 02:30 PM   #11
attgig
Chief of Naval Operations
 
attgig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the ghetto's of bawlmo'
Posts: 11,474
Send a message via ICQ to attgig Send a message via AIM to attgig Send a message via MSN to attgig Send a message via Yahoo to attgig
Quote:
Originally Posted by guiseppewv
Did you check the site they use for the fuel efficiency ratings? My friend's Olds Delta 88 (or was it a 98) from 1988 did not cut the muster on the fuel efficiency rating. The govt site said it had a combined fuel efficiency of 20 mpg.


link to look up yuor car


99 continental
Premium Gasoline
15 City
23 Hwy
18 Combined


the revised testing methods brought my mom's car down to 18. the old method showed 20.
attgig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 09:59 AM   #12
mechmike0034
No longer a Pho virgin
 
mechmike0034's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ala-effin'-bama!
Posts: 2,633
Five Reasons “Cash for Clunkers” is a Joke:

Quote:
1. The voucher replaces the trade-in deal you might otherwise get from the dealership; it’s not in addition to the car’s private sale or trade-in value. In other words, if you’re trading in a car that’s worth $3000, your net gain is only $500. Although if your car is worth $100, CFC couldn’t come at a better time.

2. We’re not sure how many folks driving cars worth $3500 or less are in the market for a new car in the first place. Sure, there’s the occasional fresh-out-of-college new-hire (we’re not sure who’s hiring right now, but we’ll play make-believe) that might still be ready to move from a Dodge Omni to a shiny new Honda Insight, but people driving cheap old beaters are probably doing so because they can’t afford a new car. And $3500 doesn’t go far when the average transaction price of new cars hovers around $24K. The vouchers don’t apply toward the purchase of used cars, for which the majority of old beaters are traded in.

3. People driving large, gas-gulping old cars and trucks often do so because they need the utility those vehicles provide. Old station wagons, for example, have few modern counterparts that are as versatile while achieving better fuel economy. Ditto pickups, which have gotten bigger and more capable but not much more fuel-efficient. And if the government thinks that someone is going to step out of a 1994 Dodge Ram into a Honda Fit, they need to get out of D.C. a little more often.

4. Naturally, we have some reservations about any bill designed to facilitate wiping out—we’re sorry, recycling—any automotive species. And let’s face it, while there are a lot of bona fide clunkers out there, we’re afraid that a bunch of future classics will get caught in this roundup. We propose, then, that a certified auto enthusiast (paid, of course) be placed at all certified CFC dealerships to screen the cars that are brought in, returning the cool cars—including anything with T-tops—to the streets.

5. Besides cleansing the U.S. of gas-guzzling pigs, the other supposed benefit of the CFC program is to provide a short-term boost to the starving auto business. However, we hope these legislators don’t expect it to meaningfully help the domestic automakers. Many of the automobiles with fuel-economy ratings high enough to qualify for the vouchers come from Japan and Korea.
__________________
"The price of progress is trouble." (C. F. "Boss" Kettering)
"50% of the American public has below-average intelligence. 70% of the American public now has regular access to the Internet. Do the math." (unknown)
"Every time you eat a steak, a hippie’s hackysack goes into the sewer." (seen on Fark)
mechmike0034 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 09:11 AM   #13
mechmike0034
No longer a Pho virgin
 
mechmike0034's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ala-effin'-bama!
Posts: 2,633
Rules May Limit Cash for Clunkers Program

Quote:
“It has to be worth not very much and it also has to get very poor E.P.A. fuel economy,” said Jack R. Nerad, the executive editorial director and market analyst for Kelley Blue Book. “It’s a fairly narrow profile. You’re talking about people who are probably economically challenged to begin with and they have to be able to qualify for a new car purchase in the midst of a deep recession. Those are some difficult parameters.”
mechmike0034 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 11:10 AM   #14
johnnymk
Chief of Naval Operations
 
johnnymk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: LEVITTOWN< PA> USA
Posts: 13,619
I bet they modify it.
__________________
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” (Winston Churchill)
johnnymk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2009, 02:21 PM   #15
attgig
Chief of Naval Operations
 
attgig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the ghetto's of bawlmo'
Posts: 11,474
Send a message via ICQ to attgig Send a message via AIM to attgig Send a message via MSN to attgig Send a message via Yahoo to attgig
http://www.cars.gov/

official site is out now, though there's no details. that'll come in a few weeks, even though the program starts today....
attgig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2009, 03:34 PM   #16
guiseppewv
Admiral
 
guiseppewv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,922
Ha! Typical govt program! The admin and Congress wanted to be able to announce that they got the program going quickly, unfortunately they are stuck in "neutral" after the "gun" went off.
guiseppewv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2009, 08:35 PM   #17
Daedalus
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 756
According to the rules, the vehicle being traded in must have been registered and insured by the buyer for at least 1 year prior to trade-in. I wonder how they'll ensure this rule is enforced? If enforcement is lax, then this bill will cause the market value of old clunkers to actually go up as demand for tradeable cars increases. It's not hard to find running clunkers for a few hundred bucks. The govt is very adept at exploring unintended consequences.

I bought my gas-guzzing truck for $2200 out the door IIRC. But I have no plans to ever buy a brand new car, so no benefit to me unless they change the rules on it.
Daedalus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:18 AM.