|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Rear Admiral Upper Half
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 3,404
|
For those who though rims couldn't get bigger than 23s...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Rear Admiral Lower Half
![]() ![]() |
Those things are friggen huge... but how stable do they look?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Rear Admiral Upper Half
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 3,404
|
Quote:
Regular gold spoke Daytons already cost a lot. Imagine what 30 inchers cost. Plus the cost of the tires... I can't imagine Pirelli manufacturing a whole lot of those. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
it must go 0-****ed up rims in two pot holes. . .
Man. . . what the hell is the point now. They might as well start taking airplaine wheels and slapping them on autos. It makes me shiver more in disgust that someone has even the thought of putting those on a truck : This is what those rims are gonna do after the first bump ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Chief of Naval Operations
![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2000
Location: LEVITTOWN< PA> USA
Posts: 13,621
|
With wheels over 17", cars really look stupid. They start looking like Matchbox toys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Commander
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
man I thought tires on my car was expensive, I would think one tire for those huge rims is around $400 or more
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Rear Admiral Upper Half
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 3,404
|
The only truck I think you could fit those 30" Daytons on would be a Hummer. That would look insane.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
can someone send me that 30" pic or post it up? i keep getting a d9d pic. tommyboomfiger@forums.gotapex.com
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Rear Admiral Upper Half
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 3,404
|
My bad... Didn't think that the pic would go away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
it didnt go away, its got an anti-leech protection so people dont steal images from thier site. |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Vice Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: ohi
Posts: 4,525
|
Quote:
Think "mass transportation" ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Rear Admiral Upper Half
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 3,404
|
If it isn't Mr. 'Bling Bling' himself...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 387
|
is this the one you're looking for? the photochopped pic?
![]()
__________________
it wasnt me....... |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Rear Admiral Lower Half
![]() ![]() |
nice...
![]()
__________________
Spigs, you MFR#1N! |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
40" huh. all i can say is that is disgusting. imagine what kind of rotors you could put in there though. and with such a big contact patch, you could cut the stopping distance in half. if it doesnt flip over first
but i still want to see that 30" pic. anyone? |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Chief of Naval Operations
![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2000
Location: LEVITTOWN< PA> USA
Posts: 13,621
|
That's about as dumb as any vehicle could look like. This could be taken to a circus so that everyone could laugh at it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
OMG I'm blind. . . AAAAAAAAAAA. What kind of morons do we live with in this world!??! Hmm, greatest tip to ya lamers and overly exaggerated rims: Forget tires, why do you need rubbers for when you can just get rims to take up the whole wheel well. . . uggh, /me slaps epoxi for showing that in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Vice Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,352
|
Dang! that's the nastiest set of oversized rims i've ever seen. That thing looks like a tractor for crying out loud!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Chief of Naval Operations
![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2000
Location: LEVITTOWN< PA> USA
Posts: 13,621
|
Wow!! It definitely fooled me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yarrr, I forgets to use me sarcasm script. Of course it be fotochopped me matey.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
court-martialled
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Brig
Posts: 0
|
Quote:
tires would just cost way to much for those ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
its a bitch to mount 255/40/17's
i can't imagine mounting those 20 or 25 profiles, on 26" wheels. sheesh
__________________
Shoe 2003 BMW M3 2008 BMW 335i hardtop convertible w/ Dinan Stage 2 2008 Toyota Tundra Extended Cab 4x4 5.7 Horsepower is fun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Ruler-Of-All-Things-Beer
![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 10,249
|
Got|DaytonsOnTheMuthaShip?
__________________
respect beer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Chief of Naval Operations
![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2000
Location: LEVITTOWN< PA> USA
Posts: 13,621
|
I just got the latest issue of Popular Hot Rodding. They had 18" and 20" wheels on some older custom cars. Really Gross!!... and these cars have big wheelwells. I hope this trend dies a slow death like fluorescent paints, murals and other weird patterns painted down the sides of cars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Ensign
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10
|
I've seen 17s and 18s on early Camaros and it looked awesome. It all depends on how good your stance is. If the car is lowered 6 inches and sitting on airbags, big wheels look stupid. If its dropped an inch and a half and the wheels fit in the wheel wells, it looks great:
![]() Last edited by natem02 : 11-28-2001 at 08:48 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
court-martialled
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Brig
Posts: 0
|
Quote:
yeah most of the time larger RIMS don't look good on older cars, but like you said, if it is done right.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Chief of Naval Operations
![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2000
Location: LEVITTOWN< PA> USA
Posts: 13,621
|
That Camaro does look nice. I would like to see a side view, if possible.
|
|
|
|