[Log In ] [New Posts] []
Go Back   GotApex? Forums Forums > General Topics > Automotive & Transportation
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-08-2003, 11:54 AM   #1
attgig
Chief of Naval Operations
 
attgig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the burbs of baltimore
Posts: 11,924
Send a message via ICQ to attgig Send a message via AIM to attgig Send a message via MSN to attgig Send a message via Yahoo to attgig
mazda buying back rx-8's

http://www.motortrend.com/features/news/112_news41/

RX-8 Short on Power, Mazda Buyback Program
USA TODAY - September 4, 2003


Motor Trend
Mazda is offering to buy back most of the 3,551 RX-8 rotary-engine sports cars sold since the July launch because engine power is as much as 5% less than advertised -- an important difference to sports car enthusiasts.

The flub interrupts an important rollout of models designed to restore Mazda's image as innovative and sporty. But the company's quick action is expected to prevent damage to Mazda's reputation.

Mazda sent letters Aug. 22 to RX-8 purchasers saying it would pay full sticker price plus taxes and other fees -- even if they've run up thousands of miles on their cars. Those who tell Mazda they will keep their cars get free scheduled maintenance for the four-year, 50,000-mile warranty period, plus $500. Buyers who don't contact Mazda get nothing.

Buyers from now on sign a form saying they've been informed of the discrepancy and aren't eligible for buyback or maintenance deals.


Thirty-one owners have asked for their money back, says Mazda spokesman Jeremy Barnes.

He says the power dropped after a last-minute change in engine tuning to meet emission rules. The drop was noticed "during ongoing testing that manufacturers perform after cars go on sale."

The RX-8 with manual transmission was supposed to deliver 247 horsepower but makes 238. The automatic transmission model was rated 207 hp, but makes 197. There's no drop in advertised acceleration, apparently because testing was done with the lower-power models.

This is the second time Mazda has overstated the power of a sports car. It made the same buyback offer to purchasers of 2001 Miata two-seaters because those produced 142 hp instead of the 155 hp that Mazda advertised.

"It's unfortunate, but let's not throw the baby out with the bath water. The RX-8's still a cool car. And Mazda's to be applauded for not denying the problem," says Gordon Wangers at AMCI, which tests cars to give automakers data to support advertising claims. "I'd still recommend it to my friends."

"The bigger problem would be that it reminds people that years ago there was problem with the rotary engine," says Dan Gorrell, at consultant Strategic Vision.

Mazda last sold rotary-power cars in the USA in 1995. Older rotaries burned oil. If owners didn't monitor them closely, engines wore out fast. The new design uses much less oil, Mazda says, and shouldn't cause problems.

Questionable power claims aren't just a Mazda problem.

--------------------------------------------------------


I wish i bought one...and used it in my roadtrips to ohio, va beach, and ocean city!!!
__________________

attgig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2003, 01:19 PM   #2
chadlnc
Lieutenant Commander
 
chadlnc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 947
It sounds like 31 people realized that they spent more than they should have and are counting their blessings now I personally would quickly take them up on the scheduled maintenance and $500 offer. I'm glad to see they are standing behind their mistake and not passing the buck.
__________________
"We're just patriots against an unjust law. Just like all those guys in prison." - Homer J. Simpson
chadlnc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2003, 02:39 PM   #3
rasetsu
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 529
I think Hyundai had this problem before too. Not that anyone who buys a Hyundai would really care...
rasetsu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2003, 02:45 PM   #4
bachviet
What's Da Pho*?
 
bachviet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SoCal (714)
Posts: 13,296
Send a message via ICQ to bachviet Send a message via AIM to bachviet
Quote:
Originally posted by rasetsu
I think Hyundai had this problem before too. Not that anyone who buys a Hyundai would really care...
Or the car is already dying...
__________________
Dell Dimension 9200 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (2.4GHz) | 4x1GB DDR2 | 256MB nVidia GeForce 8800GT

Dell Studio 17 | Intel Core i7-720QM (1.6GHz) | 2x2GB DDR3 1066MHz | 1GHz ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650

Intel P4-C 3.0GHz | ECS 865PE-A | 3x512MB PC3200 | 128MB PNY GeForce 6600GT

bachviet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2003, 03:26 PM   #5
attgig
Chief of Naval Operations
 
attgig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the burbs of baltimore
Posts: 11,924
Send a message via ICQ to attgig Send a message via AIM to attgig Send a message via MSN to attgig Send a message via Yahoo to attgig
Quote:
Originally posted by rasetsu
I think Hyundai had this problem before too. Not that anyone who buys a Hyundai would really care...

second page of the article:

· Hyundai confessed last year that it misstated power by as much as 12 hp, or 9.6%, on 1.3 million vehicles sold in the USA and Canada since 1992. Hyundai blamed sloppy record keeping and provided extended warranties to owners of the 400,000 vehicles with the biggest discrepancies. Some Kia models, which use Hyundai engines, also were involved.

· Ford Motor, which has a controlling stake in Mazda, recalled 8,100 1999 Mustang Cobras after owners found the engines did not produce the advertised 320 hp. Ford blamed changes in mufflers and intake manifolds for the problem and installed new ones free on nearly all the Cobras -- a process that took so much time it eliminated production of '00 model Cobras.


· Nissan's '02 Infiniti Q45 wouldn't accelerate to 60 mph in the 5.9 seconds the company claimed. Nissan said it tested the car under ideal weather conditions, using a light base model and lightweight driver. It didn't offer buyers anything to make good.

· Nissan cut power ratings by 5 hp on the '02 Maxima, Altima 2.5, Sentra SE-R and Spec V models shortly before they went on sale.





according to the article...nissan's the biggest punks.
attgig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2003, 04:05 PM   #6
rasetsu
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 529
Is 175hp for the Altima and 180 for SE-R not right then are or are those the adjusted numbers?
rasetsu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2003, 12:48 AM   #7
Skeptical
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: I'm in a foreign land far far away...
Posts: 90
I feel sorry for people who bought the RX-8.
Skeptical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2003, 07:47 AM   #8
guiseppewv
Admiral
 
guiseppewv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East coast
Posts: 7,116
Quote:
Originally posted by attgig



· Nissan's '02 Infiniti Q45 wouldn't accelerate to 60 mph in the 5.9 seconds the company claimed. Nissan said it tested the car under ideal weather conditions, using a light base model and lightweight driver. It didn't offer buyers anything to make good.

· Nissan cut power ratings by 5 hp on the '02 Maxima, Altima 2.5, Sentra SE-R and Spec V models shortly before they went on sale.





according to the article...nissan's the biggest punks.

How is Nissan the biggest punk? They restated the HP BEFORE they sold any and they explained how they got the Q45 to do 0-60 in 5.9 sec. Weather conditions do play a huge part in acceleration and engine performance. Take your car to a high altitude place in the middle of the summer, when it is hot, and put a 300 lb driver behind the wheel and then tell me your car performs the same.

Their practice of reporting a time of 5.9 s was a little shady but then again what manufacturer tests their cars in worst case scenarios and what manufacturer gives you wheel horsepower or torque, which is MUCH more important the HP or TQ at the crank which the manufacturer gives you when they tell you what the car's specs are.
guiseppewv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2003, 08:26 AM   #9
attgig
Chief of Naval Operations
 
attgig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the burbs of baltimore
Posts: 11,924
Send a message via ICQ to attgig Send a message via AIM to attgig Send a message via MSN to attgig Send a message via Yahoo to attgig
Quote:
Originally posted by Skeptical
I feel sorry for people who bought the RX-8.

why? Mazda's doing a good job making up for their mistake.
attgig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2003, 08:34 AM   #10
attgig
Chief of Naval Operations
 
attgig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the burbs of baltimore
Posts: 11,924
Send a message via ICQ to attgig Send a message via AIM to attgig Send a message via MSN to attgig Send a message via Yahoo to attgig
Quote:
Originally posted by guiseppewv
Their practice of reporting a time of 5.9 s was a little shady but then again what manufacturer tests their cars in worst case scenarios and what manufacturer gives you wheel horsepower or torque, which is MUCH more important the HP or TQ at the crank which the manufacturer gives you when they tell you what the car's specs are.

exactly...no manufacturer tests their cars in bad scenerios...
heck....what magazine or any person with common sense would test their car to a " high altitude place in the middle of the summer, when it is hot, and put a 300 lb driver behind the wheel"??!?!?! nobody....

however, it's only nissan that had to make excuses and give explanations on why it's not getting to 60 in under 6 seconds.




and restating the power ratings right before they go on sale is pretty smart..... it's after all the car magazines/websites hype up the cars with having 250 hp....and then right before they go on sale...they cut it by 5, without really announcing it to anybody..
attgig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2003, 10:30 AM   #11
Airencracken
Admiral
 
Airencracken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: California
Posts: 6,681
I'd be upset if my car didn't have it's rated power, I mean it only has 98hp to begin with...
__________________
"I remember my first orgasm, I just wish someone was there to share it with me..."11-05-2003 05:33 AM - Topane
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin
Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, & the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opiate of the masses. - Karl Marx
Hell is other people - Jean-Paul Sartre

Airencracken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2003, 05:13 PM   #12
Skeptical
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: I'm in a foreign land far far away...
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally posted by attgig


why? Mazda's doing a good job making up for their mistake.
I know there doing a good job with their mistake. I'm saying I feel bad for the people who bought it because they might have to send it back.
Skeptical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2003, 08:11 PM   #13
SnowSurfer
Rear Admiral Lower Half
 
SnowSurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,616
Quote:
Originally posted by Airencracken
I'd be upset if my car didn't have it's rated power, I mean it only has 98hp to begin with...

lol what kind of car?
__________________
I have an athlon xp 2500+ ... aren't you glad you know that?
SnowSurfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2003, 08:52 PM   #14
Realrammstein
Lieutenant Commander
 
Realrammstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Hayward
Posts: 915
Send a message via Yahoo to Realrammstein
Quote:
Originally posted by attgig


exactly...no manufacturer tests their cars in bad scenerios...
heck....what magazine or any person with common sense would test their car to a " high altitude place in the middle of the summer, when it is hot, and put a 300 lb driver behind the wheel"??!?!?! nobody....

however, it's only nissan that had to make excuses and give explanations on why it's not getting to 60 in under 6 seconds.




and restating the power ratings right before they go on sale is pretty smart..... it's after all the car magazines/websites hype up the cars with having 250 hp....and then right before they go on sale...they cut it by 5, without really announcing it to anybody..

Actually thta is not quite true. Dodge understated the power of the Neon SRT-4's. They rate it at 215HP, but Dyno's show it getting 215HP at the wheels. Thus, it actually has more at the crank (Mfrs. usual rated amount).
__________________
never challenge an idiot, he will bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.

Drive it like you stole it:
http://www.supermotors.net/vehicles/...y/media/516514
Realrammstein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2003, 09:46 PM   #15
Ladogaboy
Admiral
 
Ladogaboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Hiding amongst the minnows
Posts: 6,843
Quote:
Originally posted by SnowSurfer


lol what kind of car?

I believe he has a hybrid.... Don't let him fool you, though... I think he has another 15 HP locked away in that electric motor of his.
__________________
It is not enough to merely touch the face of god; you also must open your eyes so that you may see your palm.
Ladogaboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2003, 10:53 AM   #16
Airencracken
Admiral
 
Airencracken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: California
Posts: 6,681
It is a hybrid a 2002 toyota Prius. the 98hp is total.
Airencracken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2003, 06:14 PM   #17
Ladogaboy
Admiral
 
Ladogaboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Hiding amongst the minnows
Posts: 6,843
Quote:
Originally posted by Airencracken
It is a hybrid a 2002 toyota Prius. the 98hp is total.

Should've gotten the Civic.

Ladogaboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2003, 01:12 AM   #18
Airencracken
Admiral
 
Airencracken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: California
Posts: 6,681
Nah, the civic doesn't get as good milage and it sucks.
Airencracken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2003, 01:23 AM   #19
psycho-
Rear Admiral Lower Half
 
psycho-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Del Mar, CA
Posts: 2,261
Send a message via ICQ to psycho- Send a message via AIM to psycho- Send a message via MSN to psycho- Send a message via Yahoo to psycho-
BTW, the lack of horsepower never affected their published times. Apperantly, the RX-8s published manufacturer times were already accurate becuase they drew those figures from an already detuned car.
__________________
Victor
psycho- is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:44 PM.