[Log In ] [New Posts] []
Go Back   GotApex? Forums Forums > General Topics > Automotive & Transportation
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-02-2005, 03:51 AM   #1
Butch
Rear Admiral Lower Half
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,915
Prius: One Thing It's Worse For Than A Gas Guzzler

http://windowsmedia.dvlabs.com/adcri...prius-rope.asf

Of course, it's not an official ad . . . it's a spec ad . . . kind of like that VW(?) suicide car bomb ad
__________________
I used to be into sadism, necrophilia and beastiality, but then I realized I was just beating a dead horse
Butch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 04:08 AM   #2
Airencracken
Admiral
 
Airencracken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: California
Posts: 6,681
HA HA HA HA! That's great!
__________________
"I remember my first orgasm, I just wish someone was there to share it with me..."11-05-2003 05:33 AM - Topane
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin
Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, & the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opiate of the masses. - Karl Marx
Hell is other people - Jean-Paul Sartre

Airencracken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 12:04 PM   #3
InfiniteNothing
Chief of Naval Operations
 
InfiniteNothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,086
That's actually a horrible idea. Prius puts out the same amount of CO2 (if not slightly more) from burning a gallon of gas as any other car. I'm fearfull people will try that at home... well now that I think about it, it might make for a good darwin award.
__________________
As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals.
InfiniteNothing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 12:11 PM   #4
Butch
Rear Admiral Lower Half
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,915
Quote:
Originally Posted by InfiniteNothing
That's actually a horrible idea. Prius puts out the same amount of CO2 (if not slightly more) from burning a gallon of gas as any other car. I'm fearfull people will try that at home... well now that I think about it, it might make for a good darwin award.

But how much longer would it take to burn that gallon of gas?
Butch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 12:20 PM   #5
InfiniteNothing
Chief of Naval Operations
 
InfiniteNothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,086
Theoretically it would take forever as it usually turns off when it idles. Otherwise, about the same
InfiniteNothing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 02:14 PM   #6
DarkFury
Secretary of the Navy
 
DarkFury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Chillin' N Da 'Hood
Posts: 34,997
"Good for the evironment... Good for you"



Too bad it isn't all that "good looking" of a car...
__________________


DarkFury's Pimptopia - Don't Hate the Playa, Hate the Game!
Home of the Original OG Pimp (accept NO imitations)
DarkFury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 02:48 PM   #7
Butch
Rear Admiral Lower Half
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,915
Quote:
Originally Posted by InfiniteNothing
Theoretically it would take forever as it usually turns off when it idles. Otherwise, about the same

Please help me to understand if I'm wrong, but it would seem that if one is talking in per-gallon terms - and the Prius is marketed as (and ostensibly is) a car that burns fewer gallons per unit of distance or time than a non-hybrid - then a per gallon analysis wouldn't be a fair comparison in the context of the commercial.

It would seem similar to saying "If I drink 3 beers in an hour and try to drive, it would be illegal . . . but if I drink 3 beers over 3 days and try to drive, it would still be illegal."

Last edited by Butch : 10-02-2005 at 02:52 PM.
Butch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 03:22 PM   #8
InfiniteNothing
Chief of Naval Operations
 
InfiniteNothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,086
The car is marketed as being clean- as in pzev/sulev, not as being fuel efficient (in that commercial). But the pzev/sulev has nothing to do with CO2 which would be what does you in if you hooked up a car in that manner.

On a side note, that car's getting 0 mpg... as it's idleing.

Last edited by InfiniteNothing : 10-02-2005 at 03:24 PM.
InfiniteNothing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 03:28 PM   #9
GracieBayb
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Orange County
Posts: 818
man... i want a prius, because if i had one, i might actually be able to afford to drive somewhere
GracieBayb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 03:33 PM   #10
InfiniteNothing
Chief of Naval Operations
 
InfiniteNothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,086
Buy one
InfiniteNothing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 03:40 PM   #11
Butch
Rear Admiral Lower Half
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,915
Quote:
Originally Posted by InfiniteNothing
The car is marketed as being clean- as in pzev/sulev, not as being fuel efficient (in that commercial). But the pzev/sulev has nothing to do with CO2 which would be what does you in if you hooked up a car in that manner.

On a side note, that car's getting 0 mpg... as it's idleing.

The commercial makes the connection between fuel efficiency and cleanliness . . . if a car is more fuel efficient by mpg, it would logically conclude that a car would burn fewer gallons per unit of time running - regardless of distance . . . I would have to expect that parking a hummer in a garage and running the engine would be more efficient for suicide than running a prius . . .

Needless to say, I'm really still not quite getting your argument - but then again, I grew up in Manhattan and was never really around cars much.

Also, I was under the impression that the issue was carbon monoxide (CO) . . . not carbon dioxide (CO2) . . .

Last edited by Butch : 10-02-2005 at 03:43 PM.
Butch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 03:45 PM   #12
Kevster
Admiral
 
Kevster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NorCal
Posts: 6,124
Send a message via Yahoo to Kevster
Actually, wouldn't it be CO that would be doing you in faster than CO2?
__________________
I think over again
My small adventures, my fears.
The small ones that seemed so big,
For all the vital things I had to get and to reach.

And yet there is only one great thing, the only thing:

To live to see the great day that dawns,
And the light that fills the world.


-old Inuit song
Kevster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 04:04 PM   #13
Airencracken
Admiral
 
Airencracken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: California
Posts: 6,681
The damn thing wouldn't even be running. So either way it's immaterial.
Airencracken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 08:15 PM   #14
InfiniteNothing
Chief of Naval Operations
 
InfiniteNothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by Butch
The commercial makes the connection between fuel efficiency and cleanliness . . . if a car is more fuel efficient by mpg, it would logically conclude that a car would burn fewer gallons per unit of time running - regardless of distance . . . I would have to expect that parking a hummer in a garage and running the engine would be more efficient for suicide than running a prius . . .

Needless to say, I'm really still not quite getting your argument - but then again, I grew up in Manhattan and was never really around cars much.

Also, I was under the impression that the issue was carbon monoxide (CO) . . . not carbon dioxide (CO2) . . .
So if I understand you correctly
Commercial argument:
A. Car gets better mpg
B. Better mpg is cleaner
C. Car is cleaner and won't kill you

But the car is not more fuel efficeint stopped (0 mpg). It's a false premise. That invalidates the argument.

Anything else is simply speculation on our parts (i.e. what kills you first, which puts out more per time, etc.).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Airencracken
The damn thing wouldn't even be running. So either way it's immaterial.

Theoretically, it could be running if it's batteries were low enough (and the AC was on?). Perhaps another false premise.

Last edited by InfiniteNothing : 10-02-2005 at 08:20 PM.
InfiniteNothing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 08:20 PM   #15
Airencracken
Admiral
 
Airencracken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: California
Posts: 6,681
yeah, except the new prius has electric A/C. it is a false premise but it's an AD. I mean like ads are always truthful?
Airencracken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 08:20 PM   #16
Sirrich3
Rear Admiral Upper Half
 
Sirrich3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: In Sunny Southern California
Posts: 3,950
Great Ad...Not a nice looking car though
Sirrich3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 08:21 PM   #17
InfiniteNothing
Chief of Naval Operations
 
InfiniteNothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
...
Yes but the car may run the engine at idle to preserve the battery if the battery was low enough. Good question.
InfiniteNothing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 08:23 PM   #18
Airencracken
Admiral
 
Airencracken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: California
Posts: 6,681
Right I know. But it's an ad. grain of salt.

*Airencracken shoots gun of reasonablity at Infinite Nothing. HIT! IN's literalness drops 10 points!*
Airencracken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 08:28 PM   #19
InfiniteNothing
Chief of Naval Operations
 
InfiniteNothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,086
'xactly. That's kinda what I was trying to say all along. Anyone else feel like they're in a special olymic race?

Last edited by InfiniteNothing : 10-02-2005 at 08:40 PM.
InfiniteNothing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2005, 06:21 AM   #20
Merlin
Admiral
 
Merlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Square On My Arse
Posts: 7,410
Unless the radio and a/c are running the car would just be sitting there. No gas being burned. After a while the battery would run low and the recharging mechanism would kick in. But would that mechanism burn enough gas to fill the car with a deadly amount of emmissions? Or would the car just be periodically farting at you? You know enough to give you a headache but not enough to kill. After all the engine would only be running long enough to give the batteries a good charge. If it does that fast enough then the gasses will dissapate faster than they build. Ahh another pointless internet discussion.
__________________
Merlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2005, 10:05 AM   #21
InfiniteNothing
Chief of Naval Operations
 
InfiniteNothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,086
Anyone have a gen 2 prius an a troublesome child so we can finally resolve this.
InfiniteNothing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2005, 10:37 AM   #22
faither
Rear Admiral Upper Half
 
faither's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: FL
Posts: 3,240
Send a message via MSN to faither
I have an '05 and tried it before leaving for work this morning. I was unable to kill myself using the Prius's emissions. The ICE (internal combustion engine) is off during idling.

I guess if you had a big enough garage you could just drive laps until offing yourself. Mine's only three cars.
faither is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2005, 10:54 AM   #23
DarkFury
Secretary of the Navy
 
DarkFury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Chillin' N Da 'Hood
Posts: 34,997
Quote:
Originally Posted by faither
I have an '05 and tried it before leaving for work this morning. I was unable to kill myself using the Prius's emissions. The ICE (internal combustion engine) is off during idling.

I guess if you had a big enough garage you could just drive laps until offing yourself. Mine's only three cars.
Did ya attach the hose to the exhaust pipe and lead it to the window too?
DarkFury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2005, 01:05 PM   #24
WhiskeyPapa
Rear Admiral Upper Half
 
WhiskeyPapa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: 45° 11' 35" North Latitude, 95° 8' 37" West Longitude
Posts: 3,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by GracieBayb
man... i want a prius, because if i had one, i might actually be able to afford to drive somewhere
If you could afford to buy a Prius, you could afford to buy gas for a regular car.

Better yet, buy a POS 1992 Geo Metro and get 49 mpg.
__________________
WhiskeyPapa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2005, 01:12 PM   #25
Merlin
Admiral
 
Merlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Square On My Arse
Posts: 7,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Better yet, buy a POS 1992 Geo Metro and get 49 mpg.
Yeah, and never mind all the $$$ oyu'll be spending to keep a 13 year old disposable car on the road. The mechanics will just love you.
Merlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:11 PM.