[Log In ] [New Posts] []
Go Back   GotApex? Forums Forums > General Topics > Entertainment, Music, & Sports
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-23-2004, 08:33 PM   #1
ialsohaveadream
Fleet Admiral
 
ialsohaveadream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 8,077
Bulls to send Chandler and #7 pick to Indiana for Harrington

Just heard it on ESPN. Didn't check the site to find an article on it.

Anyway, the idea is that Indiana is going to get a big body and use the #7 pick on Luke Jackson from Oregon to be their next Reggie Miller.

Harrington is a nice pick-up for the Bulls. He's a solid player. I'd love to see a decent team work a trade for him.
ialsohaveadream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2004, 08:43 PM   #2
slaus
Commander
 
slaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,189
Why do I feel like the Pacers got the better end of the deal. If Chandler develops, they get another big man who can play the 5 spot.
slaus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2004, 08:45 PM   #3
ialsohaveadream
Fleet Admiral
 
ialsohaveadream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 8,077
I'd say this one is pretty even. On the one hand, Harrington is the next Jermaine O'Neal. But the Pacers already have a Jermaine O'Neal, and they can't split the PT between the two of them. So instead, the Pacers get a big body who still has the potential to blossom, plus a shooting guard to replace the soon-to-depart Reggie.

No chance this kid will have Reggie's ability to score in the clutch, though.
ialsohaveadream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2004, 08:48 PM   #4
slaus
Commander
 
slaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,189
Harrington is more of a small forward than a power forward. Imagine a lineup of Chandler, O'Neal, Artest, Jackson and Tinsley.
slaus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2004, 09:00 PM   #5
kei2
Rear Admiral Lower Half
 
kei2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by slaus
Harrington is more of a small forward than a power forward. Imagine a lineup of Chandler, O'Neal, Artest, Jackson and Tinsley.
What is it I'm trying to picture here? O'Neal and Artest are great, and Chandler has a chance to develop, but I'm not impressed with that Indy backcourt.
kei2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2004, 09:01 PM   #6
slaus
Commander
 
slaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,189
Jackson only needs to be a spot up shooter. If one of the point guards falls, they could draft a pretty good PG.
slaus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2004, 09:14 PM   #7
ialsohaveadream
Fleet Admiral
 
ialsohaveadream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 8,077
Tinsley is streaky, but they can pick up a solid backup. And Harrington can play the 4. In Indiana he got pushed into a 3 spot. He's a pretty versatile player. Kinda like a Lamar Odom, without the ball-handling skills.
ialsohaveadream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2004, 09:36 PM   #8
brainsmile
Chief of Naval Operations
 
brainsmile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: woah... why is welfareloser here with me so early in the morning and more importantly why am I wearing her clothes?!?
Posts: 13,754
In my mind Harrington is better suited for the 4 than the 3
__________________
**********************************
DCM #1 (Founder)





"Nobody beats Vitus Gerulaitis 18 times in a row." - Vitus Gerulaitis on beating Jimmy Connors after 17 failed attempts.
brainsmile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2004, 09:57 PM   #9
whitak24
easily amused
 
whitak24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: my office
Posts: 9,781
generally, i think picking up chandler is a mistake, because he's been such a bomb. but indiana still has o'neil and bender (if he could learn to play inside instead of jacking up 3s), plus a project player in chandler and a really high draft pick.

perhaps they can ship out chandler for a better backup PG.

i think chicago made a poor trade here. sure, harrington is a good player, and i think he has even more potential. but they're losing a high draft pick plus a big man, basically giving away two players and getting one. and while i could be proven wrong here, i really don't see harrington as a guy who can anchor a team and lead it to respectabilty.
whitak24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 12:13 AM   #10
slaus
Commander
 
slaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,189
I would personally die for Chandler/Curry to be on the Knicks. I dont think you ever pass up the chance to acquire potentially decent big men in the NBA.
slaus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 07:05 AM   #11
bachviet
What's Da Pho*?
 
bachviet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SoCal (714)
Posts: 13,296
Send a message via ICQ to bachviet Send a message via AIM to bachviet
Indy wants a big man so it could play against Detroit.

I don't think the Bulls lose much to give up #7 pick since this draft sucks.
__________________
Dell Dimension 9200 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (2.4GHz) | 4x1GB DDR2 | 256MB nVidia GeForce 8800GT

Dell Studio 17 | Intel Core i7-720QM (1.6GHz) | 2x2GB DDR3 1066MHz | 1GHz ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650

Intel P4-C 3.0GHz | ECS 865PE-A | 3x512MB PC3200 | 128MB PNY GeForce 6600GT

bachviet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 07:30 AM   #12
kei2
Rear Admiral Lower Half
 
kei2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,102
The Pacers almost handled the Pistons in this year's playoffs. The teams are still pretty evenly matched. I don't think the motivation behind this trade was to make them match up better against Detroit (a team whose look will be changing anyway, with Darko getting more experience and more new guys coming in).
kei2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 08:01 AM   #13
brainsmile
Chief of Naval Operations
 
brainsmile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: woah... why is welfareloser here with me so early in the morning and more importantly why am I wearing her clothes?!?
Posts: 13,754
Quote:
Originally Posted by slaus
I would personally die for Chandler/Curry to be on the Knicks. I dont think you ever pass up the chance to acquire potentially decent big men in the NBA.
I'd hate to see a G|A member kill themselves over a game
brainsmile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 08:49 AM   #14
whitak24
easily amused
 
whitak24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: my office
Posts: 9,781
Quote:
Originally Posted by slaus
I would personally die for Chandler/Curry to be on the Knicks. I dont think you ever pass up the chance to acquire potentially decent big men in the NBA.
dude, NY is already stocked with "potentially decent" big men

j/k.....but seriously.....chandler's had awhile for his "potential" to show.
whitak24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 08:21 PM   #15
DarkFury
Secretary of the Navy
 
DarkFury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Chillin' N Da 'Hood
Posts: 34,997
Looks like this trade didn't happen... Oh well...

They went for a 7 Foot guy (David Harrison) from Colorado with their pick (#29) in the first round...

Oh well... I guess Harrington is just gonna have to stay here until a better trade presents itself.
__________________


DarkFury's Pimptopia - Don't Hate the Playa, Hate the Game!
Home of the Original OG Pimp (accept NO imitations)
DarkFury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 08:33 PM   #16
bachviet
What's Da Pho*?
 
bachviet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SoCal (714)
Posts: 13,296
Send a message via ICQ to bachviet Send a message via AIM to bachviet
I didn't happen but Chicago traded Loul Deng to Phx for #31 and future 1st round pick + cash.
bachviet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 09:19 PM   #17
ialsohaveadream
Fleet Admiral
 
ialsohaveadream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 8,077
David Aldridge said it was supposed to happen. Don't blame me, I was just the messenger.

Actually, if this doesn't go through, I'd be happy. I'd love for the Heat to get into a 3 way deal that lets them trade Eddie Jones and Caron Butler, then pick up Harrington and a future #1 pick. I'm willing to give up Butler to get an athletic big.
ialsohaveadream is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:15 PM.