[Log In ] [New Posts] []
Go Back   GotApex? Forums Forums > General Topics > Entertainment, Music, & Sports
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-12-2005, 11:21 AM   #1
Booyamos
Commander
 
Booyamos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,277
Send a message via AIM to Booyamos
Colts vs Pats

Sooo who besides cheapie is excited about this?

I know i am... GO PATS! WOOOO! heh.

thoughi think it'll be a really tough game. The pats have a great defense but they are really hurt in the secondary. too man injuries and reliance on rookies right now. This could leave a lot of holes for Manning to pick apart.

But the Pats ate 6-0 against them at Gillete stadium. Homefield advantage and ol billy always comes up with some crazy scheme to control them.

I think it should be a really good/close game. the pats really need to set up their running game and run it at them to control the ball/clock.
__________________
Boo ya Grandma
Booyamos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 11:27 AM   #2
DaFunkyUnit
Rear Admiral Upper Half
 
DaFunkyUnit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: the peanut gallery
Posts: 3,909
Send a message via ICQ to DaFunkyUnit Send a message via AIM to DaFunkyUnit Send a message via Yahoo to DaFunkyUnit
i just realized that this is a rematch of the (last years?) AFC Championship Game.

its gonna come down to who can kick in the snow.

Vineteri (sp?) vs. Vanderjagt (sp?)

and I believe of all people, Vanderjagt(sp?) is already talking trash...
__________________
DaFunkyUnit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 12:10 PM   #3
guiseppewv
Admiral
 
guiseppewv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East coast
Posts: 7,116
Gotta love a kicker who talks trash.

I think the Colts are going to win this one and I am NOT a Colts fan. I am a die-hard Steelers fan.
guiseppewv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 12:23 PM   #4
whitak24
easily amused
 
whitak24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: my office
Posts: 9,781
i am pumped for this game, and while i really want the colts to win, i have to give the edge to the pats. between homefield advantage, the coaching edge, and the fact that they ALWAYS seem to find ways to win when they need to, i don't know how the colts will overcome this.

UNLESS the patriots secondary is just plain bad and manning rings them up.
whitak24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 12:37 PM   #5
guiseppewv
Admiral
 
guiseppewv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East coast
Posts: 7,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitak24
i am pumped for this game, and while i really want the colts to win, i have to give the edge to the pats. between homefield advantage, the coaching edge, and the fact that they ALWAYS seem to find ways to win when they need to, i don't know how the colts will overcome this.

UNLESS the patriots secondary is just plain bad and manning rings them up.

Ty Law being placed on the IR is a bad sign for NE.
guiseppewv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 12:50 PM   #6
raimin
Captain
 
raimin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: san francisco
Posts: 1,627
Send a message via ICQ to raimin Send a message via AIM to raimin
Quote:
Originally Posted by guiseppewv
Gotta love a kicker who talks trash.

I think the Colts are going to win this one and I am NOT a Colts fan. I am a die-hard Steelers fan.

, i think colts gonna finally win one against the pats

and he is an idiot kicker, a kicker who is an idiot
raimin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 12:50 PM   #7
cheapie
Chief of Naval Operations
 
cheapie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: raising my pimp hand strong
Posts: 13,038
Send a message via AIM to cheapie
i'm very nervous. the pats seem to have a mental edge over the colts. BUT the colts are so much better than they were at the beginning of the season. that includes the defense. and the pats are really hurting. i've desperately hoping the pats are foolish enough to think that they can just blitz peyton and disrupt him. WHENEVER teams start blitzing that always leaves the slot uncovered and peyton find the open receiver.

also a big deal will be the weather. currently the forecase for sunday is sunny and 34. wind would be bad as would a sloppy field. the sloppy field would greatly hurt freeney coming off the end. when freeney's getting to the qb, they have to dbl team him. this will open up the other good DE, Raheem Brock. plus, if they have to dbl team freeney, the TE won't be as available for those short passes brady is so good at.
__________________
70% of the world is covered by water. The rest is covered by Bob Sanders
cheapie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 01:00 PM   #8
cheapie
Chief of Naval Operations
 
cheapie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: raising my pimp hand strong
Posts: 13,038
Send a message via AIM to cheapie
Quote:
Originally Posted by guiseppewv
Ty Law being placed on the IR is a bad sign for NE.

and tyrone poole is out as well. their other starting CB. didja see what the colts did to the poor rookie when denver came to town? the pats will be relying on some pretty tenuous deep help.

i predict the pats will say that they'll concentrate on keeping the deep plays from happening at the expense of yards on the ground. which means edge will have some running room.
cheapie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 01:20 PM   #9
kei2
Rear Admiral Lower Half
 
kei2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,102
Wow this is a tough one to call.

On the one hand, there's Peyton having a record-breaking year (passer rating, TDs) and the Pats missing Ty Law and Tyrone Poole...

And on the other hand, Belichick is 6-0 against Peyton, the Pats have home field advantage...

I'll take the Colts by 10, simply because New England will be missing its star corners.

Semi-related, does anybody think Vanderjagt's comment was blown out of proportion by the media? He said he thinks the Patriots are weaker than last year and the beginning of this year (probably citing the injuries to the secondary), and that they look beatable. It's not like he said they're going to dominate them, or that they're an overrated team, or something like that. I guess it would be better to just worry about one's own team, but it seemed like people made too much of his comments.
kei2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 01:22 PM   #10
Booyamos
Commander
 
Booyamos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,277
Send a message via AIM to Booyamos
Quote:
Originally Posted by guiseppewv
Gotta love a kicker who talks trash.

But he's a kicker! lol That pretty much what the pats said after his comment...

well he's a kicker, so what.


I don't think the pats will blitz a lot, last year they really dropped back and only rushed 3 or 4. they know blitzing will just leave big holes that manning will see. Problem is with Law out and Poole out, and that other guy still sorta hurt they can't really do as much. Having Law they could just single him up on Harrison, but now they will have to double or triple him. Limits what defensive schemes they can throw out there.

I'm excited & nervous though, should be an exciting game. its nasty in boston right now (gillete is an hour or so away). raining out. But it's supposed to clear up and be 57 degrees tomorrow. I want lots of snow this weekend! plays to our advantage if there's a nasty field.
Booyamos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 01:26 PM   #11
kei2
Rear Admiral Lower Half
 
kei2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,102
I don't know that they can double cover Marvin, because Peyton is comfortable passing to other guys like Reggie Wayne and Brandon Stokley. They can occasionally do Cover 2 and give safety help on Marvin's side, but they can't afford to double cover him the whole game.
kei2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 05:09 PM   #12
bachviet
What's Da Pho*?
 
bachviet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SoCal (714)
Posts: 13,296
Send a message via ICQ to bachviet Send a message via AIM to bachviet
I'm picking the Colts on this one because they are a better team than last year and earlier this season. The Pats also hurt badly in the secondary like everyone said so Manning is going to have a field day throwing.

Hopefully I don't jinx the Colts because I don't want to see any more talk about the Pats being a dynasty.
__________________
Dell Dimension 9200 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (2.4GHz) | 4x1GB DDR2 | 256MB nVidia GeForce 8800GT

Dell Studio 17 | Intel Core i7-720QM (1.6GHz) | 2x2GB DDR3 1066MHz | 1GHz ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650

Intel P4-C 3.0GHz | ECS 865PE-A | 3x512MB PC3200 | 128MB PNY GeForce 6600GT

bachviet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 05:20 PM   #13
kei2
Rear Admiral Lower Half
 
kei2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by bachviet
I don't want to see any more talk about the Pats being a dynasty.
haha seriously. I hate hearing about how these present-day teams are dynasties. If you ask me, there hasn't been a real dynasty since the Montana/Young Niners or the Jordan Bulls.
kei2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 06:26 PM   #14
TERRIBLETOM
Commander
 
TERRIBLETOM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,261
I just hope there's a good party the day of the game...
TERRIBLETOM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 10:28 AM   #15
zenbooty
Admiral
 
zenbooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Prime Material Plane
Posts: 7,486
Send a message via Yahoo to zenbooty
Quote:
Originally Posted by kei2
haha seriously. I hate hearing about how these present-day teams are dynasties. If you ask me, there hasn't been a real dynasty since the Montana/Young Niners or the Jordan Bulls.
*cough* *cough* Dallas Cowboys *cough*


As a Patriots fan I'll admit I'd like to see one more Super Bowl and a couple more winning seasons before I say they equal what the 49'ers and Steelers did, but I'd put their current accomplishments up there with Dallas and over Green Bay in the 90's certainly.

Last edited by zenbooty : 01-13-2005 at 10:31 AM.
zenbooty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 10:55 AM   #16
BrewMaster
Ruler-Of-All-Things-Beer
 
BrewMaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 10,249
since my niners started to suck this is sad time of year for me.

i hope the Pats pull it off but I won't be upset if the Colts win either. I did grow up with Tommy Brady so I am partial to the Pats.
__________________
respect beer.
BrewMaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 11:29 AM   #17
eSDee
Old Skooler Numba 1
 
eSDee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Diego
Posts: 10,063
Send a message via AIM to eSDee
All I care about is that someone roughs up Vanderjagt. Other than that, I am rooting for the Steelers.
__________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~
3 days ~ Willie Nelson

3 days I dread to see arrive
3 days I hate to be alive
3 days filled with tears and sorrow
yesterday today and tomorrow
eSDee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 12:19 PM   #18
kei2
Rear Admiral Lower Half
 
kei2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by zenbooty
*cough* *cough* Dallas Cowboys *cough*
Wasn't the Cowboys' success before the Niners'? I thought the game with Dwight Clark's "The Catch" was what ended Dallas dominance and started the Niners' run?
kei2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 12:20 PM   #19
guiseppewv
Admiral
 
guiseppewv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East coast
Posts: 7,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheapie
and tyrone poole is out as well. their other starting CB. didja see what the colts did to the poor rookie when denver came to town? the pats will be relying on some pretty tenuous deep help.

i predict the pats will say that they'll concentrate on keeping the deep plays from happening at the expense of yards on the ground. which means edge will have some running room.


They just signed someone (Hank Poteat, I think) to take over at CB. That is not good news to have someone join the team at this late of a date.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kei2
Semi-related, does anybody think Vanderjagt's comment was blown out of proportion by the media? He said he thinks the Patriots are weaker than last year and the beginning of this year (probably citing the injuries to the secondary), and that they look beatable. It's not like he said they're going to dominate them, or that they're an overrated team, or something like that. I guess it would be better to just worry about one's own team, but it seemed like people made too much of his comments.

but I still like the kicker stepping up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kacarp
But he's a kicker! lol That pretty much what the pats said after his comment...

well he's a kicker, so what.

Yep and they insulted their own kicker, who has won many games for them with his game winning field goals as time expires.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zenbooty
*cough* *cough* Dallas Cowboys *cough*


As a Patriots fan I'll admit I'd like to see one more Super Bowl and a couple more winning seasons before I say they equal what the 49'ers and Steelers did, but I'd put their current accomplishments up there with Dallas and over Green Bay in the 90's certainly.


They need 4 SB wins to do what the Steelers did. No chance at that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by eSDeeLoco
All I care about is that someone roughs up Vanderjagt. Other than that, I am rooting for the Steelers.

I hope the Steelers win but I hope Vandy kicks the winning FG. That would be great.
guiseppewv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 12:28 PM   #20
zenbooty
Admiral
 
zenbooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Prime Material Plane
Posts: 7,486
Send a message via Yahoo to zenbooty
Quote:
Originally Posted by guiseppewv
I hope the Steelers win but I hope Vandy kicks the winning FG. That would be great.
You need to take into account the eras. Its so much harder to keep a talented championship squad together in these days of free agency and salary caps. Even if they only win 3 rings, I would put the accomplishment at the same level as the Steelers. Its like comparing baseball Hall of Famers' stats. You have to take into account the eras in which the accomplishments were made.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kei2
Wasn't the Cowboys' success before the Niners'? I thought the game with Dwight Clark's "The Catch" was what ended Dallas dominance and started the Niners' run?
The Cowboy's had two periods of glory. The first was the in the 70's, with Roger Staubach and the "Doomsday" Defense. This isn't generally considered a dynasty, though, since they only won 2 Super Bowls and were generally overshadowed by the Steelers' dynasty. This was the period that was ended by the Niners.

The second period, considered a dynasty, actually pretty much book-ended the 49'ers dynasty. This was the period in the early 90's with Troy Aickman, Emmitt Smith, Michael Irving, Jay Novacek, Larry Allan, and a bunch of other big names. They won 3 rings in 4 years, and were the most successful franchise overall throughout the early and mid 90's.

Last edited by zenbooty : 01-13-2005 at 01:07 PM.
zenbooty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 12:48 PM   #21
DaFunkyUnit
Rear Admiral Upper Half
 
DaFunkyUnit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: the peanut gallery
Posts: 3,909
Send a message via ICQ to DaFunkyUnit Send a message via AIM to DaFunkyUnit Send a message via Yahoo to DaFunkyUnit
Quote:
Originally Posted by eSDeeLoco
All I care about is that someone roughs up Vanderjagt. Other than that, I am rooting for the Steelers.

i hope Vanderjagt gets a "Unsportsman-like Conduct, Excessive Celebration" call called against him.
DaFunkyUnit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 01:05 PM   #22
Grubbie
Captain
 
Grubbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Redmond
Posts: 1,596
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaFunkyUnit
i hope Vanderjagt gets a "Unsportsman-like Conduct, Excessive Celebration" call called against him.

Or he makes a field goal, jumps up and tears his acl when he lands...... Oh wait wrong kicker....
Grubbie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 03:48 PM   #23
guiseppewv
Admiral
 
guiseppewv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East coast
Posts: 7,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by zenbooty
You need to take into account the eras. Its so much harder to keep a talented championship squad together in these days of free agency and salary caps. Even if they only win 3 rings, I would put the accomplishment at the same level as the Steelers. Its like comparing baseball Hall of Famers' stats. You have to take into account the eras in which the accomplishments were made.


That is a good point but a mute one b/c the steelers are going to get the one for the thumb this year.

If the Pats weren't so banged up in the secondary I would say that they would probably win this wknd's game but due to secondary issues they don't have a great chance of winning.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaFunkyUnit
i hope Vanderjagt gets a "Unsportsman-like Conduct, Excessive Celebration" call called against him.


That would be cool if that happened......as long as he got the penalty AFTER the GW FG.
guiseppewv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 04:07 PM   #24
zenbooty
Admiral
 
zenbooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Prime Material Plane
Posts: 7,486
Send a message via Yahoo to zenbooty
Quote:
Originally Posted by guiseppewv
That is a good point but a mute one b/c the steelers are going to get the one for the thumb this year.

If the Pats weren't so banged up in the secondary I would say that they would probably win this wknd's game but due to secondary issues they don't have a great chance of winning.
The Patriots don't beat Peyton with their secondary. They beat him with confusing and nebulous alignments.
zenbooty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 05:22 PM   #25
guiseppewv
Admiral
 
guiseppewv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East coast
Posts: 7,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by zenbooty
The Patriots don't beat Peyton with their secondary. They beat him with confusing and nebulous alignments.

No, but they do need a secondary just so they can give their DL and LBs a chance to get to Peyton. If Peyton is able to "throw wild" as opposed to "run wild" then it will be a game that the Patties cannot hang with offensively not even on their best day with their team this season. I am not sure any team could hang with Peyton's offense if it is running amuck. We'll see who's right come Sunday.
guiseppewv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 06:35 PM   #26
zenbooty
Admiral
 
zenbooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Prime Material Plane
Posts: 7,486
Send a message via Yahoo to zenbooty
Quote:
Originally Posted by guiseppewv
No, but they do need a secondary just so they can give their DL and LBs a chance to get to Peyton. If Peyton is able to "throw wild" as opposed to "run wild" then it will be a game that the Patties cannot hang with offensively not even on their best day with their team this season. I am not sure any team could hang with Peyton's offense if it is running amuck. We'll see who's right come Sunday.
They HAVE a secondary. They just don't have a great one.

Peyton's (and the Colt's offense in general) strength is reading a defense before the snap and making adjustments that take advantage of the read. So Belichick doesn't let Peyton read it. He set his guys up in a vanilla alignment and then has them shift right off the snap into their defensive coverage. This forces the Colts to try and make their adjustments after the snap, which they're not nearly as good at doing.

And as for no one being able to stop the big Midwest Machine, I remind you to go look at the recent history of these teams and remember that it is Peyton and the Colts who have something to prove here.
zenbooty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 07:16 PM   #27
cheapie
Chief of Naval Operations
 
cheapie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: raising my pimp hand strong
Posts: 13,038
Send a message via AIM to cheapie
you're right zen. the onus is entirely on the colts to beat the pats. they pats have owned them and didn't peyton have a team in college that he could never beat?

yeah. ...vandy is good. but he hasn't always been money in the huge games. he missed big shots against miami in and of course the big one against the pats this fall. of course, it was a long one. he did nail two at denver last year that were incredible and won the game so i can't say he never hits the big ones....but still.

and btw, the colts do have a grammatica on the team. not sure it's the one that torn the acl celebration or not.
cheapie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 08:00 PM   #28
ialsohaveadream
Fleet Admiral
 
ialsohaveadream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 8,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheapie
you're right zen. the onus is entirely on the colts to beat the pats. they pats have owned them and didn't peyton have a team in college that he could never beat?


I can't believe nobody has mentioned the effect Belichick will have on the game. That man can come up with some ridiculously genius gameplans.

Also, don't forget that the Colts don't have a particularly strong defense, and the Patriots have an even stronger offense than they have in the past, thanks to Dillon.
__________________
Web log
ialsohaveadream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2005, 09:23 AM   #29
dbax791
Rear Admiral Lower Half
 
dbax791's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,177
Send a message via AIM to dbax791
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grubbie
Or he makes a field goal, jumps up and tears his acl when he lands...... Oh wait wrong kicker....

Ugh. Bill Gramatica. It sucks enough being a Cardinals fan without bringing up that memory.
dbax791 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2005, 09:26 AM   #30
guiseppewv
Admiral
 
guiseppewv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East coast
Posts: 7,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by zenbooty
They HAVE a secondary. They just don't have a great one.

Peyton's (and the Colt's offense in general) strength is reading a defense before the snap and making adjustments that take advantage of the read. So Belichick doesn't let Peyton read it. He set his guys up in a vanilla alignment and then has them shift right off the snap into their defensive coverage. This forces the Colts to try and make their adjustments after the snap, which they're not nearly as good at doing.

And as for no one being able to stop the big Midwest Machine, I remind you to go look at the recent history of these teams and remember that it is Peyton and the Colts who have something to prove here.

The colts were beat last year by the pats in the playoffs. But that was then this is now. Currently the Patriots have a below average secondary at best. With Ty Law their secondary is above avg and minus all of the other injuries they have in the secondary they are good to great.

They might not be as good *after* the snap at adjusting their reads but it isn't going to matter b/c they are going to slice and dice the Pats secondary.

Bottom line is that the Pats aren't going to hang with the Colts. I personally would love it if they could b/c then my Steelers would easily spank the pats, again, and they would go to the SB but I am a realist and I do not see NE winning this wknd.
guiseppewv is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:35 AM.