Judge May Nix Huge Telecom Mergers

johnnymk · 07-12-2006, 05:09 PM

http://www.newsmax.com/money/archive...35507.cfm?s=al

Probably a good idea.

Concerns over competition worry Judge Sullivan

A U.S. judge Wednesday said he had doubts about government settlements reached last year that permitted SBC Communications to buy AT&T, and Verizon Communications to acquire MCI Inc. to proceed.
U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan said at a hearing that the Justice Department would have to demonstrate that the antitrust settlements reached with the companies went far enough to resolve concerns about competition.

"I have doubts about that," he said at the beginning of a hearing. "So I need to have the parties address that."

The hearing was convened under a federal law that requires antitrust settlements be reviewed and endorsed by a judge.

Those reviews traditionally have been perfunctory, however Congress modified the antitrust laws in 2004 giving judges more leeway to examine settlements more closely.
Sullivan questioned a lawyer for the Justice Department about exactly what the court's role should be in the review process. He also indicated he intends to have experts testify independently about the effectiveness of the settlements.

"I have a great deal of discretion," the judge said.

The government's lawyer told Sullivan that the department had painstakingly reviewed the transactions, spent eight months and 24,000 hours of staff time while conducting 300 interviews to investigate any possible competition concerns.

An attorney representing the Justice Department, Claude Scott, told Sullivan that the government's consent decrees leave "a vibrant market where there are a lot of competitors out there."

The Justice Department's antitrust division in October 2005 agreed to allow the two large deals to go forward on the condition that they lease competitors' access to telecommunications lines in more than 350 buildings located in each of the companies' territories.

SBC renamed the company AT&T Inc. and is the largest U.S. telephone company. Verizon as the second-largest telecommunications company.

Jeffbx · 07-13-2006, 06:40 AM

Well geez, they already had to break up AT&T twice, you'd think they would have learned not to allow mega telco companies anymore.

zippyjuan · 07-13-2006, 10:07 AM

Accordian teenager economics- you break up, get back together, break up. The share holders are not necessarily better off and the consumers are not necessarily better off but the top management and lawyers take all the money.

07-12-2006, 05:09 PM	#1
johnnymk Chief of Naval Operations Join Date: May 2000 Location: LEVITTOWN< PA> USA Posts: 13,621	Judge May Nix Huge Telecom Mergers http://www.newsmax.com/money/archive...35507.cfm?s=al Probably a good idea. Concerns over competition worry Judge Sullivan A U.S. judge Wednesday said he had doubts about government settlements reached last year that permitted SBC Communications to buy AT&T, and Verizon Communications to acquire MCI Inc. to proceed. U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan said at a hearing that the Justice Department would have to demonstrate that the antitrust settlements reached with the companies went far enough to resolve concerns about competition. "I have doubts about that," he said at the beginning of a hearing. "So I need to have the parties address that." The hearing was convened under a federal law that requires antitrust settlements be reviewed and endorsed by a judge. Those reviews traditionally have been perfunctory, however Congress modified the antitrust laws in 2004 giving judges more leeway to examine settlements more closely. Sullivan questioned a lawyer for the Justice Department about exactly what the court's role should be in the review process. He also indicated he intends to have experts testify independently about the effectiveness of the settlements. "I have a great deal of discretion," the judge said. The government's lawyer told Sullivan that the department had painstakingly reviewed the transactions, spent eight months and 24,000 hours of staff time while conducting 300 interviews to investigate any possible competition concerns. An attorney representing the Justice Department, Claude Scott, told Sullivan that the government's consent decrees leave "a vibrant market where there are a lot of competitors out there." The Justice Department's antitrust division in October 2005 agreed to allow the two large deals to go forward on the condition that they lease competitors' access to telecommunications lines in more than 350 buildings located in each of the companies' territories. SBC renamed the company AT&T Inc. and is the largest U.S. telephone company. Verizon as the second-largest telecommunications company. __________________ “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” (Winston Churchill)

07-13-2006, 10:07 AM	#3
zippyjuan Picture of the Day Guru Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Sunny San Diego Posts: 8,756	Accordian teenager economics- you break up, get back together, break up. The share holders are not necessarily better off and the consumers are not necessarily better off but the top management and lawyers take all the money. __________________ I add new pictures to my photo gallery pretty regularly. You can see them here if you are interested: http://www.pbase.com/jeffryz

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

07-13-2006, 06:40 AM	#2
Jeffbx Fleet Admiral Join Date: Mar 2000 Location: Michigan Posts: 9,390	Well geez, they already had to break up AT&T twice, you'd think they would have learned not to allow mega telco companies anymore.

User Name
Password
Remember Me?