[Log In ] [New Posts] []
Go Back   GotApex? Forums Forums > General Topics > Finance, Investments & Careers
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-25-2007, 09:35 AM   #1
johnnymk
Chief of Naval Operations
 
johnnymk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: LEVITTOWN< PA> USA
Posts: 13,621
Banks May have Trouble Foreclosing

from MoneyNews.com email sent to me:

Another worry for big banks: They might have trouble even proving they own your home.

The massive repackaging of loans into collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) — $6.5 trillion in outstanding securitized mortgage debt, by one estimate — is making it hard enough to price investment risk.

But a recent court ruling could make it hard for banks to foreclose at all, adding to the potential losses as each case ends up in court instead, adding interminable legal time to the process.

Ohio Federal Court Judge Christopher A. Boyko dismissed 14 foreclosures actions brought on behalf of mortgage investors. He ruled that they failed to prove their ownership of the properties on which they wanted to foreclose.

In a nutshell, here’s the problem: Mortgage notes put in securitization pools typically appear as data transfers rather than actual legal transfers, a move intended to speed the process.

However, if the mortgage note in question has not been legally transferred and assigned to the securitization trust, the trust has no legal standing to foreclose.

“The institutions seem to adopt the attitude that since they have been doing this for so long, unchallenged, this practice equates with legal compliance. Finally put to the test, their weak legal arguments compel the court to stop them at the gate,” Boyko wrote in his ruling.

Industry observers and consumer advocates note that mortgage securities make fixing troubled loans difficult because their complex structure and disparate ownership make identifying just who hold their mortgage notes difficult if not impossible.

"This court ruling in Ohio means that the securitized trusts own nothing," according to Bob Chapman of the International Forecaster. "The investors in these securities might have assumed — wrongly, it turns out — that they actually owned some real estate in these deals. The problem is, they own nothing."

The ruling involves foreclosure actions brought by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, which acts as trustee for the mortgage securitization pools that claimed to hold the underlying mortgages DBNTC wanted to reclaim.

Deutsche Bank attorneys provided documents that showed intent to convey mortgage rights rather than actual proof of mortgage ownership on the date the foreclosure actions were filed.

The Ohio court’s action is expected to bolster the position of attorneys representing distressed borrowers and may encourage other judges to demand more compelling evidence of ownership from lenders bringing foreclosure actions.

Once the lender with which the borrower initially deals with grants the loan, it typically becomes part of a pool that contains thousands of other mortgage loans. Once such a pool is created, it’s offered to investors.

A trustee bank oversees the pool’s operations to make sure that investors receive the payments borrowers make. However, there is no central repository for securitized mortgages, which can show up in more than one pool.

Attorneys arguing for borrowers assert that trustees acting for investors frequently do not produce proof of mortgage ownership.

Their assertions are supported by a recent study of 1,733 foreclosures conducted by University of Iowa associate professor of law Katherine M. Porter, which reported that 40 percent of the foreclosing creditors studied did not show proof of ownership.
johnnymk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 11:49 AM   #2
renovation
Admiral
 
renovation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: You could pick up Lindsay Lohan for less than a intel 990x, and still have money left over to bail her outta jail
Posts: 5,029
Send a message via ICQ to renovation Send a message via MSN to renovation
so if i understand this right. if your orginal mortgage had been sold. there a good chance that the paper work was done wrong. and there for the courts are finding it hard to figure out just who is holding the mortgage loan on your house?
i know a lot of times a mortgage loan. is sold many times over the term of a loan on a house .to diffrent banks and lending companys.
__________________
You could pick up Lindsay Lohan for less than a intel 990x, and still have money left over to bail her outta jail

Last edited by renovation : 11-25-2007 at 11:52 AM.
renovation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2007, 05:59 AM   #3
Jeffbx
Fleet Admiral
 
Jeffbx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,390
Send a message via MSN to Jeffbx
That's sure what it sounds like. Not like it invalidates the loan itself, but they may not have a claim on the property if you default.
Jeffbx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2007, 07:09 AM   #4
Thesifer
Vice Admiral
 
Thesifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffbx
That's sure what it sounds like. Not like it invalidates the loan itself, but they may not have a claim on the property if you default.

So who does?! I guess that's the real question...
__________________

Thesifer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007, 01:23 AM   #5
zippyjuan
Picture of the Day Guru
 
zippyjuan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sunny San Diego
Posts: 8,756
I guess the mortgage is still connected to the originator and the security purchased (loan repurchased) by the other institution is considered a financial instrument seperate from the actual mortgage? Then the back who wrote the original loan would be the one to ask for forclosure- not the loan repurchaser. Unless the originator transfered the mortgage with the loan.

I would not base any financial decions about trying to fight a forclosure based on the hope that they could not do anything about forcing you into it based on this. If someone is having difficulties or expecting them due to a change in their rate, I would suggest they talk to their lender BEFORE the change occurs and try to work it out. So far, few people are actually falling into default (although some are starting to fall further behind).
__________________
I add new pictures to my photo gallery pretty regularly. You can see them here if you are interested: http://www.pbase.com/jeffryz
zippyjuan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 11:24 AM   #6
Maarchk
Rear Admiral Upper Half
 
Maarchk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Where the east meets the west.
Posts: 3,066
So you have two transactions. Banks owns Deed, Bank owns Loan Note. Bank 'sells' both to big pool of loans. investment groups buy and sell chunks of this pool. Since the Loan can and will shift around to who is owning it, no point in creating a bunch of transactions with the deed. So the deed is held by the original bank with the promise that it belongs to the companies until the mortgage is paid off.
Person defaults, Trust company owns loan and says we foreclose. Judge says, where's the deed? Company says, umm we plan to get it from the bank at some point. Judge says, so you don't have it, you can't foreclose. Makes logical sense. But with the loan pool being such a liquid asset, it made little sense to move the deeds around. So now its gonna be a messy path of assigning all the deeds to their "rightful" owner so they can lay down foreclosure.
It would be best for them to ask the bank to foreclose since they are still the rightful owner. I don't think the people escape foreclosure, they just delay it.
__________________
"The girl is crafty like ice is cold."

"I left my heart in san francisco... And my liver at Moe's Tavern."

A real friend is one who listens to you as much as they talk to you.
Maarchk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:30 AM.