johnnymk

http://www.cnbc.com/id/31087524

Dorothy said it best in "The Wizard of Oz." There's no place like home.

Like that plucky Kansan, Americans from coast to coast have ridden their houses skyward in a furious appreciation tornado, only to plummet back to earth in a startling new and different economic landscape. The only thing missing is the Wicked Witch of the East beneath the floorboards.

"It's as though we've all awakened from a collective dream in which we were playing a game of full-scale Monopoly with our homes," says architect Jim Gauer, whose book "The New American Dream: Living Well in Small Homes" may be more timely than ever.

"In this dream, the value of our houses always went up. We were living in an age of astonishing excess, when having and wanting more was a cultural mandate. Those days, for now at least, are over."

Welcome to the new realty reality. Ostentation is passé. Size is so not cool. Small is the new big. And oh, by the way -- have you hugged your home lately?

"People have definitely lost sight of what home should be," says Barbara Corcoran, a real estate expert who frequently appears on NBC’s “Today” show. "But can you blame them? Every day, they would wake up, hear about a new sale in the neighborhood and realize how much richer they were."

As Americans focused more and more on the financial appreciation of their address, many lost the thread of what makes a house a home in the first place.

"Those were the gods that were served," Corcoran says. "When someone decided to renovate a kitchen, the first priority was, what changes would sell well, and the second priority was, what changes would we enjoy? People sacrificed many things they would personally enjoy for the sake of resale. I saw that over and over."


Now that the Glenda-esque housing bubble has burst, Americans are reacquainting themselves with the joys of homeownership from a new, healthier perspective.

What, people are actually wanting to stay in their homes?

"Oh, definitely," Corcoran quips. "They have no choice. People are rediscovering their homes for two very practical reasons: Homes aren't selling, and people don't have the money to go out to dinner as much. That's kind of where the trend starts, isn't it?"

Maybe. But there may be something bigger -- or make that smaller -- going on here as well.

Small is beautiful -- again

As the housing bubble grew, homeowners became fixated on the value of their square footage, tracking its worth as closely as a stock portfolio. That's because we tend to price houses the way we price shrimp -- by the pound rather than, say they way we price, bread -- by the loaf.

Unfortunately, when that enormous bubble popped, some homeowners realized that all that superfluous square footage was for naught -- and in many markets actually depreciated the value of their homes.

To use Gauer's analogy, it's as if the Monopoly board was suddenly overturned, and those with the most plastic houses lost the most. This, in Gauer's view, is a lesson worth learning.

"I hope it puts the final stake through the heart of the McMansion and encourages us not just to make do with, but to embrace smaller and better-designed homes," he says.

Just as suddenly, Americans are giving a second look to the small-is-beautiful movement born a generation ago.

"It's a vindication for those who already have embraced it and a revelation for those coming to it fresh," says Marc Vassallo, co-author with architect Sarah Susanka of "Not So Big Remodeling: Tailoring Your Home for the Way You Really Live."

It's not just that houses became larger as America moved to the suburbs. They began to take on functions that our grandparents could never have imagined.

VTGreg

That's a pretty worthless article. No real facts to speak. No reasons why small houses are better or certain ways that small houses meet people's needs better.

__________________
It only ends once... Anything that happens before that is just progress.

Courage is not the absence of fear but rather the judgment that something else is more important than fear.

johnnymk

Lower taxes, cheaper to heat and cool to name a few.

VTGreg

Not arguing with any of those benefits but the article isn't written with that perspective. It's saying buy a small home because it's the trendy thing to do.

I'm all for living within your means and finding the right arrangement for your situation. A married couple without kids probably doesn't need a 4000 sq ft house but a married couple with 2 kids would find a 1600 sq ft home awfully tight.

DarkFury

I'd still like a larger home... I just don't want a larger payment.

I need all the square footage I can afford to house all of my stuff.

__________________


DarkFury's Pimptopia - Don't Hate the Playa, Hate the Game!
Home of the Original OG Pimp (accept NO imitations)

mcs328

I've heard/read a similar article but with more specifics like the square footage would range from 800sf to 1600sf for new homes. The price would be around $150/sf. They would do away with master bedrooms with a step down to the other half of the room that would have housed space for a TV, sofa and love seat combo.

__________________

Daedalus

Yeah wtf? Someone partied all weekend and then had to meet a deadline so they wrote that on the bus while heading to the office?