|
|
#1 |
|
Chief of Naval Operations
![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2000
Location: LEVITTOWN< PA> USA
Posts: 13,621
|
Networking Cable: Cat5/6 or USB 2.0?
Any limitations to either?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Rear Admiral Lower Half
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,743
|
Is this from your cable/dsl modem to your computer? I think the top speed of USB is lower, but that won't matter if it's just to the internet. Also, I think 5m is the max length of a single USB cable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Secretary of the Navy
![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Chillin' N Da 'Hood
Posts: 34,997
|
Generally, if I had a choice, I'd pick CAT 6 cable from that group, even though the need for it is not an emergency right now.
http://www.broadbandutopia.com/caandcaco.html Quote:
USB 1.1 caps out at 12 Megabits per second USB 2.0 caps out at 480 Megabits per second Cat 5 Ethernet in a LAN setting can reach 1,000 Megabits+ per second (provided you have Gigabit adapters at each end) Cat 6 Ethernet has double the transmission pathways as Cat 5... so I'd think that would be significantly faster than Cat 5.(not that you can use this raw speed today... but who knows what tomorrow may bring.
__________________
DarkFury's Pimptopia - Don't Hate the Playa, Hate the Game! Home of the Original OG Pimp (accept NO imitations)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Chief of Naval Operations
![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2000
Location: LEVITTOWN< PA> USA
Posts: 13,621
|
I should have clarified. It's for networking from one computer to another. Just copying data.
Thanks, DF for the info. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Secretary of the Navy
![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Chillin' N Da 'Hood
Posts: 34,997
|
Quote:
No prob... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I was pondering that last week....
Thanks DF |
|
|
|