|
|
#1 | |
|
A Friend of a Friend
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Nikon's new D90 D-SLR with video capture?!?
Here's the blurb on their website, I'm curious on how it works...
Quote:
Last edited by yippiekiyeh : 08-27-2008 at 05:32 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Fleet Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Video is a really cool feature. Definitely put this camera in the short list at the back of my mind. It's too bad the nice lenses are bloody expensive. I'm really digging this lens for that camera: http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-17-55mm-..._tit_4_rsrsrs0
__________________
I guess that would mean turning signatures back on. I haven't had them on for ~2 years. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Rear Admiral Lower Half
![]() ![]() |
Seeing as I just recently purchased a D80, I'll definitely stick with that for now. I will admit though that the D90's video mode does sound intriguing.
__________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 952
|
Meh... no video from a still camera will ever match quality the quality of even a low-end video camera. And the still camera usually suffers as a result of trying to integrate video, so...
__________________
DISCLAIMER The preceding statements are meant to be taken as a whole, in their entirety. They may not be quoted in part and then used to flame me. They also do not imply that I believe the exact opposite of their meaning. They do not make any implication about any group, race, ethnicity, age group, or other cohort beyond what is stated above. They do not make any implications at all. They have no "tone" or "attitude." They are words. Nothing more. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Picture of the Day Guru
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sunny San Diego
Posts: 8,069
|
The features race in cameras continues. I think that most people buying a camera that costs $1000 not including lenses will probably not be using it for video that much- although it does sound like it is pretty high quality video and you can use high quality lenses for it. I think that someone interested in video will buy a video specific camera- they will be smaller and easier to use and probably cost less.
For now, it gives Nikon something that Canon does not have. But they are probably working on it too.
__________________
I add new pictures to my photo gallery pretty regularly. You can see them here if you are interested: http://www.pbase.com/jeffryz
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Chief of Naval Operations
![]() ![]() |
__________________
70% of the world is covered by water. The rest is covered by Bob Sanders |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Nikon is really doing some amazing things lately. I'm a Canon guy and I have been really impressed with the D3, D300, D700, and now the D90. I wonder what Canon is going to do to answer these.
I'm hoping for a 5D Mk. II. I've been relatively unimpressed with Canon's recent offerings (1Ds Mk. III excepted). I really dislike the crop factor of APS sized sensors, I don't know why the became popular. APS failed as a film format, but it is really thriving as a digital sensor size. I'd much prefer to have a full 35mm sized sensor, but the cameras equipped with them are fairly expensive. (5D, D3, D700, 1Ds) Though I must say that I had a video function on my Panasonic DMC-FZ30 that I used for around a year and I probably used it only four or five times. I don't think this is that big of a deal really. However the rest of the camera is fairly impressive. That being said, one of the major limitations of this video mode is going to be the microphone. The video might be pretty good at 720p and 24fps, but I'm pretty certain that the in camera mic is going to be fairly anemic. If there was a way to attach an exterior mic, that'd be a nice option. Competition is good. The bad thing about SLRs (and DSLRS) is that you get locked into a system of expensive lenses and peripherals that makes it a big headache to switch systems. Sure I'd love to just own both Nikon and Canon stuff, but that's really impractical. We'll see what Photokina brings.
__________________
"I remember my first orgasm, I just wish someone was there to share it with me..."11-05-2003 05:33 AM - Topane They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, & the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opiate of the masses. - Karl Marx Hell is other people - Jean-Paul Sartre
Last edited by Airencracken : 08-28-2008 at 01:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Fleet Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The main problem with the full frame sensors is it makes the lenses way too big, bulky, and expensive. Think about the 12x zoom lens on your Panny, that lens would scale up to 1' 3" on a 35 mm camera. Now, if you put a 5D in front me, I certainly wouldn't refuse it.
Last edited by InfiniteNothing : 08-28-2008 at 06:00 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
True, but you can't switch that lens, with an SLR you can. That way you can change your focal length at will. Its a worthy trade off. As you're well aware, one of the Panny's biggest problems is noise. Much less so for even my lowly XTi. Bigger sensor=less noise (generally) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Fleet Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I guess I didn't finish my point. The APS sized sensor is a compromise between the two: Very little noise without 1 ft lenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Picture of the Day Guru
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sunny San Diego
Posts: 8,069
|
Nikon calls their smaller (not 35mm full frame) sensors "DX". My Nikon D80 is a DX camera and I like that you can get a smaller, lighter lens for the equivelent focal length. My long range zoom is 70- 300mm which would be the same as a 450mm lens at the long end- but is much more portable than a 450mm lens would be. That also means it can be easier to hand-hold (especially since it includes Nikon's vibration reduction system which I believe is a weight which a small motor spins around the barrel of the lens like a rocket stabilizer).
I can use any regular Nikon 35mm camera lenses on it (some may require manual settings) but it is true that the DX lenses are not recommended for full frame cameras (they may cause shadows in the corners of the images). I definately like the lower weight factor of DX lenses. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Fleet Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A 35 mm lens on an aps sensor is what causes the crop factor I believe AC was mentioning. Essentially you only get the middle of the lens image so the lens effectively becomes more of a zoom lens with a higher aperture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2000
Location: living with my mommy
Posts: 5,541
|
As a person who already has various Nikon lenses and who has always been thinking of dabbling in video as a hobby this is great. I can't even imagine how much it would cost to buy an HD video camera with lenses of various focal lengths that are capable of shallow depths of field. No hobbyist would be able to buy that.
The resolution is HD, and the frame-rate looks fine. http://chsvimg.nikon.com/products/im...90/en/d-movie/
__________________
Please keep sigs 25kb or smaller.
|
|
|
|