|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Commander
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,207
|
I got a question that is being debated on.
What is the advantages and disadvantages of mainframe centralization versus client/server decentralization. Where do you see it in the future? What do you guys think? ![]()
__________________
Check out the MadCool Network! 411Seek: Popular Portal and PPC Search Engine KKDiscount: Oriental Superstore FreeLanceCenter: Buy or Provide FreeLance work @ Your Price! 123Designing: Webmaster Resource Supersite CupidContact.com: Dating Site with Web Cam, Audio & Video Greetings, and much more! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Fleet Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ha ha! Funny you should ask -
I was debating this the other day. It goes in cycles - First was the mainframe. All processing was done on a single powerful machine - people had to schedule processor time to run their apps. All terminals were just connections to the mainframe - no local processing. I think this quote sums it up well - "A processor on every desktop? What a waste!" Don't remember who said that, but that quote came back & bit him in the a**. Next, PCs got more & more powerful. Mainframe connections were still the norm, but local apps started to be more popular. The notion of 'client-server' apps caught on as desktops got more & more powerful. Store the data on the server & process it locally! Next, people began to wonder - why have that big PC on your desk if you're just running Word & e-mail? The server is already holding the data anyway. Thus came the thin client. Next - hold on - you've got a big powerful server in your back room. Why are you buying new PCs every three years? Load up Citrix - use your server as it was meant to be used - to serve applications! Now that's not catching on too well - let's go back to client-server. Kinda funny... |
|
|
|