|
|
#1 |
|
Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Hiding amongst the minnows
Posts: 6,843
|
I'm curious... just how fast was/is the Cray II supercomputer?
![]()
__________________
It is not enough to merely touch the face of god; you also must open your eyes so that you may see your palm. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 905
|
Typical speed is/was 0kmph. About 300kph when dropped out of a plane.
Thats my way of saying "I don't know, and I'm bored."
__________________
YVAN EHT NIOJ |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Hiding amongst the minnows
Posts: 6,843
|
haha, well... I'm guessing it is before most of the G|A? members' time...
But I'm figuring that the average desktop today could outperform it... |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Vice Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
ripped from a cheesy french site....
"1985 should be waited until to see the first supercomputer exceeding the theoretical power of 1 gigaflops: the CRAY II equipped with 4 procresseurs with 250 MHz."
have a nice day |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Hiding amongst the minnows
Posts: 6,843
|
Haha, wow...
Well, I also found these other links... http://www.csiberkeley.com/Tech_Info/h.pdf http://www.cray.com/company/history.html That's just sad... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 905
|
Something slightly related...the G4 Powerbook was the first notebook faster then a gigaflop. Since a supercomputer was defined as one that could do a gigaflop, Apple marketed the G4 Powerbook as "the world's first portable supercomputer."
Outpreformed by the average desktop? I think so, seeing as how something around 1.5GHz should outrun the old 400/500MHz G4. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Banned
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Posts: 8,700
|
Quote:
I should hope so. If a 500mhz G4 was better than a P4 1.5 I think Mac wouldnt have the market share problem they have. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Hiding amongst the minnows
Posts: 6,843
|
Quote:
You might be surprised... Hey, Darth... what would be the chance of reviewing a Mac system for 3-D gaming? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Vice Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
what would be the point, they have gf4mx's lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Hiding amongst the minnows
Posts: 6,843
|
Quote:
True... Too bad the GeForce 4 Ti's aren't Mac compatible... I wonder if the new Matrox cards will be... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 339
|
You cannot really compare RISC and CISC CPus in the way you are trying to. The arcitecture are so different that it is impossible to say a 1.5Ghz P4 is faster than 800Mhz G4. The G4 has a stronger FPU by far. The G4 is faster per Mhz than the P4 however it is limited because of extreme heat at high Mhz. Since Apple likes to avoid fans and such they are working on other methods of cooling.
Think about it this way. You can run 40yards in 8seconds or so, but the other guy also runs in 8 seconds but took less steps to get there. You moved faster, but since he took less steps it took the same amount of time. A G4 vs a P4 in Photoshop would be about 500Mhz G4 being equal to 1Ghz P4. Sure it has hardly any games on the Mac, but alot of good ones are comming. Also just a note...the Mac does have a version of the GF4 Ti but I have no idea whether it's the 4400/4600 or what PC version is equivelant.
__________________
WindowsXp Pro Albatron PX845PEV Pro @ 158Mhz FSB Intel P4 2.26 @ 2.68Ghz w/Stock Intel HSF Enermax 431Watt PSU ATI Radeon 9700Pro @ 345/337(674DDR) 512MB Corsair XMS3200 DDR @ 421Mhz 40GB IBM Deskstar 60GXP 7200RPM ATA/100 60GB Maxtor 7200RPM ATA/100 Pioneer 16x DVD-Rom Teac W540E CDRW (40x/12x/48x) Hercules Game Theater XP 6.1 soundcard |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 339
|
I also forgot to mention. The market share held by the PC isn't because of the P4 or Intel. AMD still has a large userbase and the real draw is the amount of software avaiable for the Windows OS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Hiding amongst the minnows
Posts: 6,843
|
Quote:
I was going to make a comment on this, but then I realized the audience... ![]() |
|
|
|
|