AMD lightens Load

ufcrusher · 11-18-2002, 05:12 PM

http://www.forbes.com/technology/200...h_1113amd.html

NEW YORK - By the end of this week, chipmaker Advanced Micro Devices should reveal how it plans to save itself in 2003.

There is much work to do at AMD (nyse: AMD - news - people ). Losses are piling up, totaling about $448 million in the first three quarters of the year on sales of $2 billion. Much of the share of the global PC processor market that it had seized--point by precious percentage point--from rival Intel (nasdaq: INTC - news - people ) has evaporated. Intel's chips now go into about 83% of the world's PCs, up from 77% a year ago, according to Mercury Research. The overall decline in demand for PCs, and hence the chips that go into them, hasn't helped.

It also hasn't helped that Intel continues to release faster PC chips; it's due to break the 3-gigahertz performance barrier any day now. AMD, whose chips have lagged behind, has argued that pure clock speed isn't the only thing that accurately measures a chip's performance. The argument may hold up, but Intel's response--aggressive price cuts--have done much to extend its lead.

Chief Executive Hector de Ruiz has a plan to get the company back on track, but it can't happen without significant pain. The goal is to cut $100 million from quarterly expenses next year, which would require a workforce reduction. Rumors have it that pink slips have already shown up in the in-boxes of hundreds of AMD employees around the world. By the end of the week, the company should be ready to confirm exactly how many jobs will be lost, but expectations are that the cuts will range from 10% to 20% of AMD's staff, or between 1,300 and 2,600 jobs. Those layoffs will come on top of 2,300 jobs eliminated in September 2001, and another 200 in May.

But there's more cutting to be done. Ruiz expects to reach a point where AMD, which turned in sales of $508.2 million in its most recent quarter, will be able to break even with sales of $775 million.

That means more cuts in tender places. First, Ruiz says AMD will have to take what he calls a "significant charge" for restructuring costs; he has so far described this as being in the "several hundred million dollar" range.

Other points of the cost reduction plan call for cutting sales, general and administrative costs by 9% for 2003, as well as another 9% from research and development.

"The plans seems to indicate that management has a good grasp of what they need to do," says Dan Scovel, analyst at Needham and Co. in New York. "But these are pretty significant changes, and I need to know more details before I'm going to endorse it."

Research and development has been one of AMD's bright spots in recent years. AMD spent more than $650 million on R&D last year, and the fruits of R&D labor from previous years are starting to show. Its Sledgehammer 64-bit server chip, which will be sold under the brand name Opteron, is showing significant promise for helping the firm break into the low-end server business. AMD's Clawhammer chips, which have been delayed until next year, are expected to add new fuel in the PC performance race with rival Intel.

Clawhammer, a PC chip that is capable of running in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes, was expected to retake some of the ground that AMD lost to Intel over the past year. It was initially scheduled for release before the end of this year.

"It used to be that Sledgehammer, the server chip, was going to be icing on the cake," Scovel says. "Then it went from being the icing to being the cake. Now it's the bread that AMD hopes to survive on."

AMD's R&D efforts have pushed the envelope in other areas. The company just announced the availability of a new type of flash memory chip that stores twice the data of other flash chips without slowing down performance.

Other indications of AMD's long-term cost reduction plan are already clear. Earlier this year it announced a deal to jointly build and operate a chip factory in Singapore with Taiwanese contract chipmaker United Microelectronics (nyse: UMC - news - people ). It has also shifted some of its research efforts on next-generation manufacturing technologies to joint efforts with German memory chipmaker Infineon (nyse: IFX - news - people ) and UMC. Kevin Krewell, analyst at Instat/MDR, expects more deals like these, in which AMD seeks to shift some of its costs onto partner companies.

"It helps AMD mitigate the impact on the business, but it gets the costs savings it needs," Krewell says. "The tradeoff is that AMD would lose some of the control over things it develops in-house."

And after what appears to be the toughest two-year period in the chip industry's history, expectations are that the picture should brighten next year. The Semiconductor Industry Association last week predicted a 19.8% growth in overall chip sales for 2003.

Showtime · 11-18-2002, 10:20 PM

Intel is trying to kill of AMD. What's new?

I hope the next batch of AMD chips kicks intels @ss.

Might have to put my $ where my mouth is and buy an AMD rig.

-jel

sleepminded · 11-18-2002, 10:52 PM

hang in there AMD...i dont want any intel crap

faither · 11-19-2002, 09:29 AM

I'll go Apple or Transmeta before I go back to Intel.

kain9i6 · 11-19-2002, 10:36 AM

AMD, Apple or nothin.. I'll go back to playing Doom on my TI-82 if AMD goes bye-bye..

ribitch · 11-19-2002, 10:41 AM

if the price is right, then i may consider an intel system

i hate intel.

AMD or Apple all the way

~~Cantacuzene~~ · 11-19-2002, 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by kain9i6
AMD, Apple or nothin.. I'll go back to playing Doom on my TI-82 if AMD goes bye-bye..

"I'll leave the country if George Bush wins the election." We've all heard idle threats like this before.

Capricornholio · 11-21-2002, 05:30 PM

AMD ain't goin anywhere. They have been around for 30 or 40 years!

~~Cantacuzene~~ · 11-21-2002, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Capricornholio
AMD ain't goin anywhere. They have been around for 30 or 40 years!

Dinosaurs were here for hundreds of millions of years and where are they now? Spilling into the atlantic off the coast of spain...

bachviet · 11-21-2002, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cantacuzene

Dinosaurs were here for hundreds of millions of years and where are they now? Spilling into the atlantic off the coast of spain...

I hope you realize that without AMD, you would have paid $400 for a 2.0Ghz P4 CPU... No competition is bad for consumer!

I still stick with AMD anyway!

Capricornholio · 11-21-2002, 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cantacuzene

Dinosaurs were here for hundreds of millions of years and where are they now? Spilling into the atlantic off the coast of spain...

Right so it's likely AMD will stay during our lifetime so I can enjoy them!

~~Cantacuzene~~ · 11-22-2002, 08:55 AM

Never said I didnt like AMD, in fact I love them, but sometimes reality calls.

PreDatoR · 11-24-2002, 06:37 PM

AMD won't be going anywhere anytime soon. They've been around too long and have made it past harder times than right now only to come out on top. I'm praying after the Barton is released it mops the PEE4 up.

Markel · 11-24-2002, 10:19 PM

I sincerly hope that AMD stays around to keep things fast and affordable. However, there are no guarantees in business. I once worked for the #2 computer company (135,000 employees) that doesn't exist today (Digital Equipment Corporation). They had superior hardware and superior software, but questionable management and marketing.

11-18-2002, 05:12 PM	#1
ufcrusher Admiral Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: Boca Raton, FL: By way of: Poway, CA; Gainesville, Fl; Penn Valley, Pa. Posts: 5,680	AMD lightens Load http://www.forbes.com/technology/200...h_1113amd.html NEW YORK - By the end of this week, chipmaker Advanced Micro Devices should reveal how it plans to save itself in 2003. There is much work to do at AMD (nyse: AMD - news - people ). Losses are piling up, totaling about $448 million in the first three quarters of the year on sales of $2 billion. Much of the share of the global PC processor market that it had seized--point by precious percentage point--from rival Intel (nasdaq: INTC - news - people ) has evaporated. Intel's chips now go into about 83% of the world's PCs, up from 77% a year ago, according to Mercury Research. The overall decline in demand for PCs, and hence the chips that go into them, hasn't helped. It also hasn't helped that Intel continues to release faster PC chips; it's due to break the 3-gigahertz performance barrier any day now. AMD, whose chips have lagged behind, has argued that pure clock speed isn't the only thing that accurately measures a chip's performance. The argument may hold up, but Intel's response--aggressive price cuts--have done much to extend its lead. Chief Executive Hector de Ruiz has a plan to get the company back on track, but it can't happen without significant pain. The goal is to cut $100 million from quarterly expenses next year, which would require a workforce reduction. Rumors have it that pink slips have already shown up in the in-boxes of hundreds of AMD employees around the world. By the end of the week, the company should be ready to confirm exactly how many jobs will be lost, but expectations are that the cuts will range from 10% to 20% of AMD's staff, or between 1,300 and 2,600 jobs. Those layoffs will come on top of 2,300 jobs eliminated in September 2001, and another 200 in May. But there's more cutting to be done. Ruiz expects to reach a point where AMD, which turned in sales of $508.2 million in its most recent quarter, will be able to break even with sales of $775 million. That means more cuts in tender places. First, Ruiz says AMD will have to take what he calls a "significant charge" for restructuring costs; he has so far described this as being in the "several hundred million dollar" range. Other points of the cost reduction plan call for cutting sales, general and administrative costs by 9% for 2003, as well as another 9% from research and development. "The plans seems to indicate that management has a good grasp of what they need to do," says Dan Scovel, analyst at Needham and Co. in New York. "But these are pretty significant changes, and I need to know more details before I'm going to endorse it." Research and development has been one of AMD's bright spots in recent years. AMD spent more than $650 million on R&D last year, and the fruits of R&D labor from previous years are starting to show. Its Sledgehammer 64-bit server chip, which will be sold under the brand name Opteron, is showing significant promise for helping the firm break into the low-end server business. AMD's Clawhammer chips, which have been delayed until next year, are expected to add new fuel in the PC performance race with rival Intel. Clawhammer, a PC chip that is capable of running in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes, was expected to retake some of the ground that AMD lost to Intel over the past year. It was initially scheduled for release before the end of this year. "It used to be that Sledgehammer, the server chip, was going to be icing on the cake," Scovel says. "Then it went from being the icing to being the cake. Now it's the bread that AMD hopes to survive on." AMD's R&D efforts have pushed the envelope in other areas. The company just announced the availability of a new type of flash memory chip that stores twice the data of other flash chips without slowing down performance. Other indications of AMD's long-term cost reduction plan are already clear. Earlier this year it announced a deal to jointly build and operate a chip factory in Singapore with Taiwanese contract chipmaker United Microelectronics (nyse: UMC - news - people ). It has also shifted some of its research efforts on next-generation manufacturing technologies to joint efforts with German memory chipmaker Infineon (nyse: IFX - news - people ) and UMC. Kevin Krewell, analyst at Instat/MDR, expects more deals like these, in which AMD seeks to shift some of its costs onto partner companies. "It helps AMD mitigate the impact on the business, but it gets the costs savings it needs," Krewell says. "The tradeoff is that AMD would lose some of the control over things it develops in-house." And after what appears to be the toughest two-year period in the chip industry's history, expectations are that the picture should brighten next year. The Semiconductor Industry Association last week predicted a 19.8% growth in overall chip sales for 2003. __________________ Welcome my son, welcome to the machine...Where have you been? It's alright we know where you've been....

11-18-2002, 10:52 PM	#3
sleepminded Lieutenant Commander Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: in a straight jacket, tied up in a padded cell Posts: 968	hang in there AMD...i dont want any intel crap __________________ m00...ph34r t3h n00b [-=1manclan=-]n00b

11-19-2002, 10:41 AM	#6
ribitch Rear Admiral Upper Half Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Michigan Posts: 3,672	if the price is right, then i may consider an intel system i hate intel. AMD or Apple all the way __________________ http://ribitch.com/ipod.html

11-24-2002, 10:19 PM	#14
Markel Chief of Naval Operations Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 11,733	I sincerly hope that AMD stays around to keep things fast and affordable. However, there are no guarantees in business. I once worked for the #2 computer company (135,000 employees) that doesn't exist today (Digital Equipment Corporation). They had superior hardware and superior software, but questionable management and marketing. __________________ stay low... keep moving...

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-18-2002, 10:20 PM	#2
Showtime Lakers fanatic Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: L.A. ->SoCal<- O.C. Posts: 7,338	Intel is trying to kill of AMD. What's new? I hope the next batch of AMD chips kicks intels @ss. Might have to put my $ where my mouth is and buy an AMD rig. -jel __________________ NBA REPORT 10-11/ The 3-Peat! 1948 1949 1950 1952 1953 1954 1972 1980 1982 1985 1987 1988 2000 2001 2002 2009 2010 Reigning NBA CHAMPS!

11-19-2002, 09:29 AM	#4
faither Rear Admiral Upper Half Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: FL Posts: 3,240	I'll go Apple or Transmeta before I go back to Intel.

11-19-2002, 10:36 AM	#5
kain9i6 Lieutenant Commander Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Signal Hill, Ca Posts: 859	AMD, Apple or nothin.. I'll go back to playing Doom on my TI-82 if AMD goes bye-bye..

11-21-2002, 05:30 PM	#8
Capricornholio Lieutenant Junior Grade Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: NJ Posts: 179	AMD ain't goin anywhere. They have been around for 30 or 40 years!

11-22-2002, 08:55 AM	#12
~~Cantacuzene~~ Banned Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA Posts: 8,700	Never said I didnt like AMD, in fact I love them, but sometimes reality calls.

11-24-2002, 06:37 PM	#13
PreDatoR Ensign Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Washington State Posts: 28	AMD won't be going anywhere anytime soon. They've been around too long and have made it past harder times than right now only to come out on top. I'm praying after the Barton is released it mops the PEE4 up.

User Name
Password
Remember Me?