[Log In ] [New Posts] []
Go Back   GotApex? Forums Forums > General Topics > Hardware
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-20-2002, 08:44 PM   #1
Jenny
Chief of Naval Operations
 
Jenny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Kansas City area
Posts: 10,947
Send a message via ICQ to Jenny Send a message via AIM to Jenny
Need help choosing between 2 digital cameras

Ok, long story short: My mom is getting us a digital camera for Christmas. She bought one at Sams Club and then saw it (or so she thought) at Walmart (where she works part time, since she can't make enough money teaching) for $30-$35 cheaper. She got the 2nd one home (expecting to return the first one to Sams) and realized they weren't exactly the same thing.

I can't find reviews. Help me decide if I absolutely need to have the higher priced one...

Kodak Easy Share 4330

Kodak Easy Share 4230

Thanks in advance.
__________________
Check out my spoilers for over 20 shows @ SpoilerFix.com

Check out my TV blog, where I post weekly & daily TV
schedules, TV news, interviews with TV stars & more!
All new TV forums as well @ TV Is My Pacifier
Jenny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2002, 09:18 PM   #2
skynet
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 523
It really depends on what you will be using it for, and how good of an eye you have for pictures.

http://www.kodak.com/cgi-bin/webCata...Digital+Camera

http://www.kodak.com/cgi-bin/webCata...Digital+Camera

It seems like the main differences are that the 4330 has 3.1MP(11" x 14") v 2MP(8" x 10") and it also have 10X Zoom VS 6X Zoom. However they both have 3X optical zoom. Optical Zoom means no quality reduction. The 4300 Has some extra bells and whistles but nothing too extrodinary.

If you want really nice pictures for the web, I would keep the 4330, but then again I have done alot of photoshop work so I get picky to the bone. If you are just going to be printing the pictures, the 4230 should be plenty good.
skynet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2002, 09:24 PM   #3
Jenny
Chief of Naval Operations
 
Jenny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Kansas City area
Posts: 10,947
Send a message via ICQ to Jenny Send a message via AIM to Jenny
Mostly, we will be using it to take pictures of our son, send to my mom to see via email, etc. Probably won't print out much, since we don't have a photo printer.

Is the 2 mega-pixel a lot worse quality than a 3.1?
Jenny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2002, 09:40 PM   #4
skynet
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 523
That is really something that you would have to decide. Take a gander

4230
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2002_...0_samples.html

4330
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2002_...0_samples.html

The both take some very nice pictures. Take a look at the reviews to see if there is anything in particular you like better about one.

Since you will be emailing the pictures and be taking up close pictures I think you'll be fine with the 4230. You will probably want to crop the images anyway for suitable email. But be sure you check out the reveiws and the sample pics.
skynet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2002, 08:02 AM   #5
caribiner23
Commander
 
caribiner23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,127
Given the choice, I would go for the higher density.

At some point, you may want to blow up some images in print and the extra resolution will make a difference.

If you are not planning on printing a lot, or if you aren't going to print any pictures larger than 8x10, the 2.1 will work just fine.
caribiner23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:27 PM.