|
|
#1 |
|
Lieutenant Junior Grade
![]() Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 111
|
Why Lite On?
I've just been wondering, what makes the Lite On CD-RW drives better? Everybody keeps saying they're better, but I'm not picking up on whey. Do they burn more reliably? Sorry if this is a really common question -- search didn't turn up much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Fleet Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Because they're cheap, fast, readily available everywhere, and some can be upgraded (48x can be flashed to a 52x).
(Updated to pop-up free link) Last edited by Jeffbx : 05-15-2003 at 11:43 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: You can’t get there from here, USA
Posts: 1,797
|
Quote:
:Stupid: dont use this guys link it is popup central use this one it has less popups http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread....threadid=60774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: You can’t get there from here, USA
Posts: 1,797
|
also is it worth the risk for this little improvemsnt
anyways we tested a similar sized burn and @ 48x he burnt a 692mb cd in 2min46sec @ 52x I burnt a 698mb cd in 2min32sec so in this example probably saved approx 10-15sec give or take the fact I burnt a 6mb larger file |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Lieutenant Junior Grade
![]() Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 111
|
Thanks for the info.
|
|
|
|