|
|
#1 |
|
Ensign
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 21
|
9600xt vs 9500pro
This could be a hardware question, or a deals question, but I'll ask it here.
sapphire atlantis 9500 pro for 129 vs ati radeon 9600 xt for 180 Which is the better deal? Which is the better card? I play 1st person shooters mainly and want dx9 support.
__________________
hâ¥ôk |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Utah
Posts: 5,420
|
All I can say is, when you unlock the overclocking for the 9500 Pro, that thing is smokin'
Although I don't know much about the 9600 XT, you do get a free copy of Half Life 2 with purchase, so if you were planning on getting it anyway, you can drop the price of the 9600 XT down $45-50 to $130 ^_^
__________________
And closer... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
What's Da Pho*?
![]() ![]() |
If you could get the R9500Pro for $129, get it...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 248
|
i don't think you can go wrong with either card. I have a R9500pro and I personally think its great. I play alot of first person and simulator games so I think its good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Posts: 8,700
|
YEah finding a 9500pro for $129 will be the tough part, but if you can, go for it. The 9500pro is marginally faster than the 9600xt and the only reason I would not count the HL2 bundle as a good deal is that you are basically giving them a $50 loan which there is no promise date of repayment. That $50 would be better kept in a savings account or something where it will at least gain some interest and then spend it on HL2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Vice Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I thought it was the other way around? Do you have a review handy? BTW, 9600XT has it's own supported form of overclocking, called overdrive, which should boost performance by 7-15%. Does that comment take that into consideration? Don't quote me on this, but I think the XTs are more widely supported by games than it's predecessors. I know that the 9700pro, even though faster, has compatibility issues with certain games. maybe the same is true with the 9500??
__________________
"I know the pieces fit, cause I watched them fall away." "Cold silence has A tendancy to Atrophy any Sense of compassion." MJK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Posts: 8,700
|
Look at the Hardocp review. The 9500pro is a slight bit faster. Thats the power of 8 pipelines verse 4.
As far as compatability, they all run on the r3xx core so they all share the same compatabilty issues/non-issues. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SoCal
Posts: 348
|
From reviews I've seen the 9600XT is slightly faster than the 9500pro. It also has a slightly enhanced pixel shader and an f-buffer that may be used in future games. OEM's of the 9600xt can be found for $160.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I was looking at these cards too, and I was told by someone I would not see a jump in performance over the GeForce4 PNY Ti4400 that I have now. I have a 1800XP+ system, but I will be getting a 2600+XP soon enough.
What do you think? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Posts: 8,700
|
From the HardOCP Nvidia 5700 review...
Game Vice City http://www.hardocp.com/image.html?im...NfNl8yX2wuZ2lm Call of Duty http://www.hardocp.com/image.html?im...NfNl81X2wuZ2lm |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Chief of Naval Operations
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|