[Log In ] [New Posts] []
Go Back   GotApex? Forums Forums > General Topics > Hardware
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-07-2003, 09:37 AM   #1
havok
Ensign
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 21
9600xt vs 9500pro

This could be a hardware question, or a deals question, but I'll ask it here.

sapphire atlantis 9500 pro for 129

vs

ati radeon 9600 xt for 180

Which is the better deal? Which is the better card? I play 1st person shooters mainly and want dx9 support.
__________________
hâ¥ôk
havok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2003, 09:59 AM   #2
ski
Admiral
 
ski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Utah
Posts: 5,420
All I can say is, when you unlock the overclocking for the 9500 Pro, that thing is smokin'

Although I don't know much about the 9600 XT, you do get a free copy of Half Life 2 with purchase, so if you were planning on getting it anyway, you can drop the price of the 9600 XT down $45-50 to $130 ^_^
__________________
And closer...
ski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2003, 02:32 PM   #3
bachviet
What's Da Pho*?
 
bachviet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SoCal (714)
Posts: 13,296
Send a message via ICQ to bachviet Send a message via AIM to bachviet
If you could get the R9500Pro for $129, get it...
__________________
Dell Dimension 9200 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (2.4GHz) | 4x1GB DDR2 | 256MB nVidia GeForce 8800GT

Dell Studio 17 | Intel Core i7-720QM (1.6GHz) | 2x2GB DDR3 1066MHz | 1GHz ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650

Intel P4-C 3.0GHz | ECS 865PE-A | 3x512MB PC3200 | 128MB PNY GeForce 6600GT

bachviet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2003, 02:47 PM   #4
Grumpy
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 248
i don't think you can go wrong with either card. I have a R9500pro and I personally think its great. I play alot of first person and simulator games so I think its good.
Grumpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2003, 03:13 PM   #5
Cantacuzene
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Posts: 8,700
YEah finding a 9500pro for $129 will be the tough part, but if you can, go for it. The 9500pro is marginally faster than the 9600xt and the only reason I would not count the HL2 bundle as a good deal is that you are basically giving them a $50 loan which there is no promise date of repayment. That $50 would be better kept in a savings account or something where it will at least gain some interest and then spend it on HL2.
Cantacuzene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2003, 06:28 PM   #6
gwilks98
Vice Admiral
 
gwilks98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: StL
Posts: 4,300
Send a message via AIM to gwilks98
Quote:
Originally posted by Cantacuzene
The 9500pro is marginally faster than the 9600xt

I thought it was the other way around? Do you have a review handy?

BTW, 9600XT has it's own supported form of overclocking, called overdrive, which should boost performance by 7-15%. Does that comment take that into consideration?

Don't quote me on this, but I think the XTs are more widely supported by games than it's predecessors. I know that the 9700pro, even though faster, has compatibility issues with certain games. maybe the same is true with the 9500??
__________________
"I know the pieces fit, cause I watched them fall away."

"Cold silence has
A tendancy to
Atrophy any
Sense of compassion."

MJK
gwilks98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2003, 08:02 PM   #7
Cantacuzene
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Posts: 8,700
Look at the Hardocp review. The 9500pro is a slight bit faster. Thats the power of 8 pipelines verse 4.

As far as compatability, they all run on the r3xx core so they all share the same compatabilty issues/non-issues.
Cantacuzene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2003, 12:54 AM   #8
ceeka
Lieutenant
 
ceeka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SoCal
Posts: 348
From reviews I've seen the 9600XT is slightly faster than the 9500pro. It also has a slightly enhanced pixel shader and an f-buffer that may be used in future games. OEM's of the 9600xt can be found for $160.
ceeka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2003, 08:46 AM   #9
SmokeyDP
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Middlesex, NJ
Posts: 541
Send a message via AIM to SmokeyDP Send a message via Yahoo to SmokeyDP
I was looking at these cards too, and I was told by someone I would not see a jump in performance over the GeForce4 PNY Ti4400 that I have now. I have a 1800XP+ system, but I will be getting a 2600+XP soon enough.

What do you think?
SmokeyDP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2003, 09:21 AM   #10
Cantacuzene
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Posts: 8,700
From the HardOCP Nvidia 5700 review...

Game Vice City

http://www.hardocp.com/image.html?im...NfNl8yX2wuZ2lm

Call of Duty

http://www.hardocp.com/image.html?im...NfNl81X2wuZ2lm
Cantacuzene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2003, 04:19 PM   #11
sbp
Chief of Naval Operations
 
sbp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 11,037
Send a message via ICQ to sbp Send a message via AIM to sbp
Quote:
Originally posted by SmokeyDP
I was looking at these cards too, and I was told by someone I would not see a jump in performance over the GeForce4 PNY Ti4400 that I have now. I have a 1800XP+ system, but I will be getting a 2600+XP soon enough.

What do you think?
You are not going to see a big perforamnce jump. Save your money and upgrade next year SmokeyDP.
sbp is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:19 AM.