Pda

Grumpy · 12-13-2003, 02:45 PM

I've done some researches about some PDA's and I have found that the iPAQ's are the ones the fit my needs.

I was looking at HP iPAQ 1945 Pocket PC and the HP iPAQ h2215 Pocket PC. I read some good reviews about these two and some of you reommanded these two PDA's for some gotapexers.

I have a pretty hard time deciding on which one to get...so does anyone have any suggestions?

ski · 12-13-2003, 03:13 PM

DEFINITELY get the 2215 over the 1945. You'll enjoy:

-a faster processor (300-400MHz and 64MB RAM is what you need for performance without noticible lag)

-compact flash AND secure digital slots, while the 1945 only has SD. This means that for MP3 use, you can over double your capacity. Also, if in the future you want to slap in a Wifi compact flash card, or a GPS setup you will be able to do this. Secure Digital peripherals are a LOT more money than CF ones.

Grumpy · 12-13-2003, 04:35 PM

alright thanks Ski for your input.

ski · 12-13-2003, 06:46 PM

no problemo... make sure you post which one you get and how you like it

LPMiller · 12-16-2003, 09:26 PM

As a counter point, If you don't really care about compact flash, the 1945 is a very nice pda, tiny size, has enough performance at 266mhz, and has better battery life than the 2215. Also, it's easier to see in low light conditions.

But both are really cool PDA's.

12-13-2003, 02:45 PM	#1
Grumpy Lieutenant Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 248	Pda I've done some researches about some PDA's and I have found that the iPAQ's are the ones the fit my needs. I was looking at HP iPAQ 1945 Pocket PC and the HP iPAQ h2215 Pocket PC. I read some good reviews about these two and some of you reommanded these two PDA's for some gotapexers. I have a pretty hard time deciding on which one to get...so does anyone have any suggestions?

12-13-2003, 03:13 PM	#2
ski Admiral Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Utah Posts: 5,420	DEFINITELY get the 2215 over the 1945. You'll enjoy: -a faster processor (300-400MHz and 64MB RAM is what you need for performance without noticible lag) -compact flash AND secure digital slots, while the 1945 only has SD. This means that for MP3 use, you can over double your capacity. Also, if in the future you want to slap in a Wifi compact flash card, or a GPS setup you will be able to do this. Secure Digital peripherals are a LOT more money than CF ones. __________________ And closer...

12-16-2003, 09:26 PM	#5
LPMiller Chief News Editor & Master of His Domain Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Minnesota Posts: 8,161	As a counter point, If you don't really care about compact flash, the 1945 is a very nice pda, tiny size, has enough performance at 266mhz, and has better battery life than the 2215. Also, it's easier to see in low light conditions. But both are really cool PDA's. __________________ lpmiller Chief News Editor Nobel Prize Nominee Reverend in the Universal Life Church Once Shot A Man For Snoring Too Loud Way Too Lazy To Change His Signature "The strength to change what I can, the inability to accept what I can't, and the incapacity to tell the difference." - Calvin and Hobbes

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

12-13-2003, 04:35 PM	#3
Grumpy Lieutenant Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 248	alright thanks Ski for your input.

12-13-2003, 06:46 PM	#4
ski Admiral Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Utah Posts: 5,420	no problemo... make sure you post which one you get and how you like it

User Name
Password
Remember Me?