[Log In ] [New Posts] []
Go Back   GotApex? Forums Forums > General Topics > Software, OS, and the Internet
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-16-2009, 06:30 PM   #1
mechmike0034
aka the keg killer
 
mechmike0034's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ala-effin'-bama!
Posts: 2,738
Pingtest.net

Quote:
Pingtest.net is a free broadband quality analyzer designed to complement Speedtest.net. This troubleshooting tool grades your connection on how well it is likely to handle things like voice services (VoIP), streaming music or video, telecommuting or online gaming.

Another one for the bookmarks...

I hope that at some point they do a mini version (like Speedtest.net) that you can host free on your webpage or blog.
__________________
"The price of progress is trouble." (C. F. "Boss" Kettering)
"50% of the American public has below-average intelligence. 70% of the American public now has regular access to the Internet. Do the math." (unknown)
mechmike0034 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2009, 10:36 AM   #2
ray
captain awesome
 
ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,054
I found the test on pingtest.net took longer to actually run than when I run it with Speedtest.net. I don't know if it's due to the website design itself (slower loading pages) or perhaps my connection to the pingtest servers are actually slower than my connections to the speedtest servers. In any case, nice to have another option to get a gauge on performance.
ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 10:17 AM   #3
Cheesypuff
Vice Admiral
 
Cheesypuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Cali, but missing Hong Kong and Texas
Posts: 4,782
Send a message via AIM to Cheesypuff Send a message via MSN to Cheesypuff Send a message via Yahoo to Cheesypuff


this is mine =) it sucketh
__________________
Life is like toilet paper, long and useful!
The stars at night, are big and bright *clap 4x* deep in the heart of TEXAS!
Cheesypuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 04:46 PM   #4
Airencracken
Admiral
 
Airencracken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: California
Posts: 6,681
I got a B*. (I don't have a JRE on my computer)
__________________
"I remember my first orgasm, I just wish someone was there to share it with me..."11-05-2003 05:33 AM - Topane
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin
Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, & the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opiate of the masses. - Karl Marx
Hell is other people - Jean-Paul Sartre

Airencracken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 09:19 PM   #5
mechmike0034
aka the keg killer
 
mechmike0034's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ala-effin'-bama!
Posts: 2,738


That's from the notebook while listening to the most excellent W3 Blues Radio streamed to the desktop...
mechmike0034 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 09:47 PM   #6
gwilks98
Vice Admiral
 
gwilks98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: StL
Posts: 4,300
Send a message via AIM to gwilks98
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheesypuff


this is mine =) it sucketh

my guess it's because of packet loss plus jitter. 2% packet loss bites, but it's still usable. Anything above 5% and you'll feel like you're on dialup.
__________________
"I know the pieces fit, cause I watched them fall away."

"Cold silence has
A tendancy to
Atrophy any
Sense of compassion."

MJK
gwilks98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 10:01 PM   #7
gwilks98
Vice Admiral
 
gwilks98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: StL
Posts: 4,300
Send a message via AIM to gwilks98
Good find Mike.

As a networker, I launched Wireshark to take a look at what this guy's doing during the test.
During the "ping test" he's not pinging at all, but sending UDP to the target server on 8080, all one directional traffic from me outbound. (Ping is an ICMP request followed by an ICMP response on a different port.) I wasn't expecting his result to be accurate since the traffic was all in one direction, (and ping is two directions) but he was spot on.
During the "jitter test" he's sending what appears to be near-blank sequenced non-HTTP data on 8080 to the target, receiving a response, then repeating ad-nauseum. Each direction is sequence per TCP and I'm betting he's measuring how often packets arrive out of sequence.

I'm curious how a test like this would work inside my work, where we have IDS/IPS sensors, internet compression devices and a slow proxy server getting in the way.

It'd be neat if they would allow you to adjust the time the test can run. 5-10 seconds won't paint a very accurate picture on a flakey link.


Something else to mention: this test doesn't explain the whole picture. If you ISP supports it, you can flag your voice/multimedia/streaming traffic with QoS flags which can get that traffic preferential treatment on the wire. This ping-test will not be able to account for this, but I don't think it's designed to.

Last edited by gwilks98 : 11-23-2009 at 10:04 PM.
gwilks98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 12:19 AM   #8
Airencracken
Admiral
 
Airencracken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: California
Posts: 6,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwilks98
Good find Mike.

As a networker, I launched Wireshark to take a look at what this guy's doing during the test.
During the "ping test" he's not pinging at all, but sending UDP to the target server on 8080, all one directional traffic from me outbound. (Ping is an ICMP request followed by an ICMP response on a different port.) I wasn't expecting his result to be accurate since the traffic was all in one direction, (and ping is two directions) but he was spot on.
During the "jitter test" he's sending what appears to be near-blank sequenced non-HTTP data on 8080 to the target, receiving a response, then repeating ad-nauseum. Each direction is sequence per TCP and I'm betting he's measuring how often packets arrive out of sequence.

I'm curious how a test like this would work inside my work, where we have IDS/IPS sensors, internet compression devices and a slow proxy server getting in the way.

It'd be neat if they would allow you to adjust the time the test can run. 5-10 seconds won't paint a very accurate picture on a flakey link.


Something else to mention: this test doesn't explain the whole picture. If you ISP supports it, you can flag your voice/multimedia/streaming traffic with QoS flags which can get that traffic preferential treatment on the wire. This ping-test will not be able to account for this, but I don't think it's designed to.

Makes me wonder if snort interfered with my test.
Airencracken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 08:28 AM   #9
ramazank2
Commander
 
ramazank2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 1,295
Wow I got a nice connection at home!!!


My first scan came out horrible....


A retest came out great! Can I really trust a site that varies so much from test to test?
ramazank2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 09:33 AM   #10
Markel
Chief of Naval Operations
 
Markel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 11,733
No complaints here

__________________
stay low... keep moving...
Markel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2009, 10:12 AM   #11
gwilks98
Vice Admiral
 
gwilks98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: StL
Posts: 4,300
Send a message via AIM to gwilks98
Quote:
Originally Posted by ramazank2
A retest came out great! Can I really trust a site that varies so much from test to test?
You sure it's the site and not your connection?
gwilks98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2009, 11:35 AM   #12
mechmike0034
aka the keg killer
 
mechmike0034's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ala-effin'-bama!
Posts: 2,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwilks98
You sure it's the site and not your connection?

Exactly - run multiple tests if you question the first test's results. Try a couple of different servers as well. You're looking for long-term trends, not short-term spikes.
mechmike0034 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2009, 10:35 PM   #13
gwilks98
Vice Admiral
 
gwilks98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: StL
Posts: 4,300
Send a message via AIM to gwilks98
One more thing...it could be your router. Home (wireless) routers are notorius for not being able to handle consistent streams.
gwilks98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2009, 04:00 PM   #14
ramazank2
Commander
 
ramazank2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 1,295
Nobody talks **** about my router... It is bad ass!!! (linksys 610N)

Just playin... I dont know what happened in the first scan.
ramazank2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:52 AM.