|
|
#1 |
|
Lieutenant Junior Grade
![]() |
i'm wanting to get a laptop that will be used almost exclusively for watching divx encoded video (specifically friends. .heh..) anyhoo, i was wondering if anyone knew the minimum requirements (comp spec. wise..) to play such files.
thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
One thing though, if the divx is compressed at a higher rate, some older comps will not display the full fps. But the video and sound will stay in sync.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Lieutenant Junior Grade
![]() |
heh.. sup spig, long time no see.. anyhoo
well, i tried playing on a old p166, 32mb ram and it played like crap. the sound was great but the video was wayyyy laggy and not even close to sync'ed. so i tried playing 300k/s real media and that was better, yet not close to what it was supposed to be. so hmm.. i think i'm willing to pay for more ram if that'll fix my problem (i'm only wanting to play divx, not encode it). lmk what you guys think.. thanks again |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 5,064
|
can you upgrade your cpu?
I've been into DIVX for only a few weeks now, but I've learned a lot. Media player using the non-hacked DIVX codecs (the only ones you should use) are fairly taxing. If you can get something in the 400 range, using a sound card that has a very small cpu load, you should be good. However, just like mp3's were years ago, some movies, as spigidygak said, are recorded at a very high rate, so your comp needs to decode more info per frame, and that can get ugly on lower-speed comps.
I record and encode around 1300, and they barely play on my P2-400.
__________________
Five years... |
|
|
|