|
|
#1 |
|
Vice Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 4,813
|
Free Wi-Fi? Get Ready for GoogleNet.
Free Wi-Fi? Get Ready for GoogleNet.
By Om Malik, August 12, 2005 What if Google (GOOG) wanted to give Wi-Fi access to everyone in America? And what if it had technology capable of targeting advertising to a user’s precise location? The gatekeeper of the world’s information could become one of the globe’s biggest Internet providers and one of its most powerful ad sellers, basically supplanting telecoms in one fell swoop. Sounds crazy, but how might Google go about it? First it would build a national broadband network -- let's call it the GoogleNet -- massive enough to rival even the country's biggest Internet service providers. Business 2.0 has learned from telecom insiders that Google is already building such a network, though ostensibly for many reasons. For the past year, it has quietly been shopping for miles and miles of "dark," or unused, fiber-optic cable across the country from wholesalers such as New York’s AboveNet. It's also acquiring superfast connections from Cogent Communications and WilTel, among others, between East Coast cities including Atlanta, Miami, and New York. Such large-scale purchases are unprecedented for an Internet company, but Google's timing is impeccable. The rash of telecom bankruptcies has freed up a ton of bargain-priced capacity, which Google needs as it prepares to unleash a flood of new, bandwidth-hungry applications. These offerings could include everything from a digital-video database to on-demand television programming. An even more compelling reason for Google to build its own network is that it could save the company millions of dollars a month. Here's why: Every time a user performs a search on Google, the data is transmitted over a network owned by an ISP -- say, Comcast (CMCSK) -- which links up with Google's servers via a wholesaler like AboveNet. When AboveNet bridges that gap between Google and Comcast, Google has to pay as much as $60 per megabit per second per month in IP transit fees. As Google adds bandwidth-intensive services, those costs will increase. Big networks owned by the likes of AT&T (T) get around transit fees by striking "peering" arrangements, in which the networks swap traffic and no money is exchanged. By cutting out middlemen like AboveNet, Google could share traffic directly with ISPs to avoid fees. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Commander
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
thx...interesting
__________________
PAIN IS WEAKNESS LEAVING YOUR BODY..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,578
|
Hmmm...makes sense to me if they can cut out the middle man to save money and at the same time make more money by selling additional services as a side benefit.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
wow that sounds really cool, good find
__________________
WoW - Perenolde - chars: intron, modena Computer - AMD 64 3700+ 939 on NF4 SLi mobo (ZALMAN CNPS 9500), 2 GB DDR466 (2-3-2-5), XFX Geforce 7900GT 256mb (520mhz core, 24 pipes, 1500mhz memory), Western Digital Raptor 74GB Serial ATA HD 10k, 850GB in other HD's, 21in Widescreen LCD |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Chief of Naval Operations
![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2000
Location: LEVITTOWN< PA> USA
Posts: 13,621
|
Aren't there still costly maintenance fees for the network?
__________________
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” (Winston Churchill) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Vice Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,338
|
Sounds like it may still be a good investment to buy some google stock.. eventhough the price is outrageously high
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Chief of Naval Operations
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: woah... why is welfareloser here with me so early in the morning and more importantly why am I wearing her clothes?!?
Posts: 13,754
|
define outrageously high... compared to Berkshire Hathaway?
__________________
********************************** DCM #1 (Founder) ![]() "Nobody beats Vitus Gerulaitis 18 times in a row." - Vitus Gerulaitis on beating Jimmy Connors after 17 failed attempts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Chief of Naval Operations
![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,086
|
Oh man. Google is taking over the world. At least we know now who our masters will be.
__________________
As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: California
Posts: 6,681
|
1337. At least our new masters have a good sense of humor.
__________________
"I remember my first orgasm, I just wish someone was there to share it with me..."11-05-2003 05:33 AM - Topane They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, & the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opiate of the masses. - Karl Marx Hell is other people - Jean-Paul Sartre
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
it's starting to scare me. all that google is doing.
__________________
"I pick my nose too but never eat it." - bachviet, 3/30/04 if anyone wants to go scuba diving in oahu or wants to learn who to scuba dive in oahu, PM me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Rear Admiral Upper Half
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I, for one, welcome our new information-hungry overlords.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Rear Admiral Upper Half
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Where the east meets the west.
Posts: 3,066
|
So in 10 years the world will be owned by, Google, Amazon, Starbucks, Disney, and Mc Donalds?
Its interesting.. But what are they going to do? Drive out all internet providers and make our whole nation a wireless world? That would be cool, but it will probably only appeal to consumers, cause businesses will want to still have secure networks and redundant connections... Sounds cool, but i wonder to what end they seek to go... 10 dollars a month for wireless any where in the nation? that would be tight...
__________________
"The girl is crafty like ice is cold." "I left my heart in san francisco... And my liver at Moe's Tavern." A real friend is one who listens to you as much as they talk to you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Fleet Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Don't forget Microsoft! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
What's Da Pho*?
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() Anyway it would be cool if the price is right for wireless high speed connection nationwide. |
|
|
|
|