|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What kind of firewall(s) do you use? | |||
| Hardware...I use the NAT one in my router. |
|
5 | 31.25% |
| Software...I don't have a router/don't use NAT. |
|
0 | 0% |
| Hardware & software...double coverage. |
|
11 | 68.75% |
| *gulp* What's a firewall? |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Commander
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Firewall...hardware, software, or both?
I've seen a lot of comment lately on firewalls and running only hardware or software but then I've also seen people say both. Which made me wonder...
So what do you use? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Fleet Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
None of the above...
I have a dedicated hardware firewall with stateful packet inspection that also acts as a router, rather than the *slightly* different setup of buying a router that has a firewall built in. I turn on the Windows XP SP2 firewall on my machines than run XP, but other than that I don't use any software security solutions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Chief of Naval Operations
![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 11,733
|
Both. As I said in another thread, hardware as the primary inbound protection, software primarily to let me know (and control) what applications are trying to send outbound (which is why I DON'T use the XP firewall).
__________________
stay low... keep moving... |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Secretary of the Navy
![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Chillin' N Da 'Hood
Posts: 34,997
|
Both for me...
Netgear router (hardware) and ZoneAlarm (software)
__________________
DarkFury's Pimptopia - Don't Hate the Playa, Hate the Game! Home of the Original OG Pimp (accept NO imitations)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Admiral
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 5,064
|
Hardware. Use MAC filtering.
__________________
Five years... |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Commander
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hardware only for me .... the software ones have caused me more troubles than any "intruder" ever has.
__________________
Facebook me if you so desire. Guns don't kill people. Chad Greenway kills people. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: wherever you go, there you are
Posts: 388
|
Quote:
MAC filtering on wireless networks is worse than useless. It gives you a false sense of security. For a good overview of wireless security go to http://www.grc.com/securitynow.htm and scroll down to Episode 11. WEP and MAC address filtering are both flawed beyond belief and really don't protect the user from anything but the most basic attacks. Anything above that and the attacker will own your WiFi. As for the poll, I use both: Netgear router (wired, not wireless) with NAT filtering and firewallAlso I don't use IE for browsing the internet or OE for email. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
What's Da Pho*?
![]() ![]() |
I use NAT along with MAC filtering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Lieutenant Junior Grade
![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rego Park, NY
Posts: 65
|
Router with NAT (and WPA & MAC filtering)
Desktop (via ethernet) - software fire wall Laptop (wireless) - without software fire wall |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Rear Admiral Lower Half
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,245
|
Both. It's great to not worry about intrusions.
|
|
|
|