Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: IBM Lays Claim to Cheaper, Faster Memory

  1. #1
    Chief of Naval Operations johnnymk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    LEVITTOWN< PA> USA
    Posts
    13,621

    IBM Lays Claim to Cheaper, Faster Memory

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/2008...pcworld/144432

    IBM is developing a type of memory that it says could one day be faster and more reliable than today's hard drives and flash memory.

    Called "racetrack," it is a solid-state memory that aims to combine the best attributes of flash, like having no moving parts, and the low cost of hard drives for an inexpensive form of nonvolatile memory that will be stable and durable, said Stuart Parkin, an IBM Fellow.

    Racetrack memory stores information in thousands of atoms in magnetic nanowires. Without the atoms moving, an electrical charge causes data to move swiftly along a U-shaped pipe that allows data to be read and written in less than a nanosecond, Parkin said. A nanosecond is a billionth of a second and commonly used to measure access time to RAM.

    The memory reads 16 bits of data through one transistor, so it reads and writes information 100,000 times faster than flash memory, Parkin said.

    "In flash memory and hard drives, one transistor can access 1 bit, or with flash, maybe 2 or possibly even 4 bits, that's it. We are going to use... a transistor to access many bits of information."

    Racetrack is still in its early days. The concept was proposed four or five years ago, Parkin said, and IBM hopes to be able to provide terabytes worth of storage from such devices in a few years.

    "It will take two to four years to build a prototype in which we build these reading-and-writing elements on a nanoscopic scale. In four years we can perhaps demonstrate it works and then manufacture it," Parkin said.

    Racetrack memory has no moving parts, it is "virtually unbreakable" and will never wear out, unlike flash drives, which could wear out after 10,000 read-and-write cycles, Parkin said. He likened the U-shaped design of horizontal pipes to a racetrack.

    The memory keeps atoms constant, making it more durable than hard drives or flash. "Whenever you start to move atoms you have problems and devices wear out from fatigue after a time," Parkin said.

    Racetrack memory's storage capacity is similar to flash's and may soon exceed hard-drive capacities, Parkin said.

    Hard disks rotate to access information, while racetrack memory uses an electrical charge to read and write data, so it also uses less electricity, he said.

    It will be inexpensive to manufacture because fewer transistors will be required and each memory chip will hold thousands of nanowires in a small footprint, Parkin said.

    The premise behind racetrack memory is spintronics, a technology that manipulates the charge and spin properties of electrons. Using spintronics, hard-drive makers have developed drives that read data from a microscopically small area.

    Parkin is widely noted for his work on spintronics and helping double the density of hard drives every year. Scientists Albert Fert, of France, and Peter Grunberg, of Germany, won the Nobel Prize in physics in 2007 for their spintronics research.

  2. #2
    Commander ramazank2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Costa Mesa, CA
    Posts
    1,295
    "Racetrack memory has no moving parts, it is "virtually unbreakable" and will never wear out, unlike flash drives"

    Flash doesnt have any moveable parts either?

  3. #3
    Chief of Naval Operations InfiniteNothing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    10,086
    It does have limited rewrites though. Some more than others
    As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals.

  4. #4
    Rear Admiral Upper Half Maarchk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Where the east meets the west.
    Posts
    3,067
    Quote Originally Posted by ramazank2
    "Racetrack memory has no moving parts, it is "virtually unbreakable" and will never wear out, unlike flash drives"

    Flash doesnt have any moveable parts either?
    Bad grammar on their part. It shouldn't have been a comma as that makes you think the two lines are connected. It should have been a semi-colon, showing two separate thoughts. Rt memory has no moving parts; it is vu and will never wear out, unlike flash.

    People are lazy and love to connect sentences that should not be.
    "The girl is crafty like ice is cold."

    "I left my heart in san francisco... And my liver at Moe's Tavern."

    A real friend is one who listens to you as much as they talk to you.

  5. #5
    Admiral guiseppewv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    East coast
    Posts
    7,116


    They did use bad grammar in that sentence.




    Thanks for the article! I enjoyed it.

  6. #6
    Chief of Naval Operations johnnymk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    LEVITTOWN< PA> USA
    Posts
    13,621
    Quote Originally Posted by Maarchk
    Bad grammar on their part. It shouldn't have been a comma as that makes you think the two lines are connected. It should have been a semi-colon, showing two separate thoughts. Rt memory has no moving parts; it is vu and will never wear out, unlike flash.

    People are lazy and love to connect sentences that should not be.
    In a society that uses your instead of you're and loose for lose, that's a minor infraction that very few would even notice. However, you are correct.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •