Legal Child pornography......

[stupidzbu]

THIS IS DISGUSTING! i can't believe what I just read....

so.. naturally.. i turn to you.. G|A ... lets show em what organization can do!

(even though staples.com is still around and it has been about 3 days since I tried to start that revolution!)

http://www.msnbc.com/news/580416.asp

thats an article on MSNbC (DUH!) ... talks about 2 sites... you can figure out the links from the article...

basically.. there is a site that charges about $30 a MONTH for people to gain access.. to see little boys and girls get spanked by their parents.. they show pictures of the kids (sometimes naked.. sometimes just their asses) bruised.... inflammed butts... etc etc....

is there ANYONE brave enough to admit that they believe this is NOT child pornography?! CAUSE YOU'RE WRONG!!
it's a DISGUSTING fetish.... which shows CHILDREN NUDE ......


so.. if that doesn't boil you up.... lets go to the SECOND site...

they offer.. pictures of boys... VERY CLEARLY under the age of 18... in underwear... NAKED... showering... playing around in the beach NAKED.... posing in underwear....

DISGUSTING!!!

what can possibly be done to stop these SICK ASS BASTARDS?!

someone must know something....
i'll even start some form of petition if need be...

god damn people are derranged.. nasty... and FUCKED UP! this coming from a person whom you all think is abnormal!!

[MadCool]

Sick World that We Live in....

[TheLoneGunman]

What about all those pictures my parents have of me in the tub, on the diaper table, running around, and just being naked (and showing the fact that I am circumcised, least you doubt it)?

Where do you draw the line?

[cruelpupet]

nothing can be done, casue as long as it is not considered obscene (ie. involving sexual acts) it is protected as art.
Now while I might not agree with it being art (i haven't actually looked at your links), i do believe that it has to be protected. Once you start banning something, there is no stopping from it going further, and I am a big believer in freedom of expression.


also..on a side note...some people believe that giving pedophiles an outlet for their fetish, helps keep them from abusing children....at least thats what i remember reading somewhere about canada...child porn is legal there.

[m0j0]

i have a difficult time with it being ok to produce "child erotica." they say it's not child porn....but child erotica. last time i checked, naked pix were considered porn. those that are not as lewd were considered "soft porn." naked is naked. naked is porn. pix of naked kids is child porn.

[cruelpupet]

also...

there are many people who look younger then they are...for example there was a girl in my college who was 19 at the time... i saw her in the campus center the day they had a bunch of Jr. High school kids there. I thought she was one of them because she was so petite and short.

my friend briann, looks like shes 13 at times, when she is actually turning 19 this summer. My 16 year old cousin has a more developed body than she does.

[cruelpupet]

Originally posted by m0j0
i have a difficult time with it being ok to produce "child erotica." they say it's not child porn....but child erotica. last time i checked, naked pix were considered porn. those that are not as lewd were considered "soft porn." naked is naked. naked is porn. pix of naked kids is child porn.

nope....nude pics that are not sexual are labled as art. doesnt matter what the age of the subject is. Soft porn, is sexual, but not involving ant sexual acts...harcore is when there is an act (solo, or with someone)

[m0j0]

well crapuccino! so playboy is art? i stand corrected. i don't like it...but i stand corrected.

[stupidzbu]

umm.. the thing is..... LoneGunMan.... do your parents sell or provide the pics of you circumsized to internet sites that charge $30 a month for membership?
when they show these pictures... is there a possibility of a sick bastard masterbating away?

now cruelpuppet... i must agree.. an outlet WOULD prevent children from being abused.... but... just do me a favor...
go to http://www.mykidspank.com and go through their preview... and then tell me.. are kids NOT being abused with this outlet??

i see some black, some blue, and some TEARS for crying out loud!

I am against cencorship.. becuase like Mill, i believe that everyone should express themselves .. that way.. we can uphold the truth by contesting it to what anyone can come up with... or we can find a NEW truth when the old one isn't upheld...

BUT... like Dahl says, we only possess intrinsic equality... my rights, freedoms, liberty are limited to the extent where they don't impose on YOUR rights, freedoms, and liberties....

Child pornography... imposes on the childrens RIGHTS to not be violated... to NOT be emotionally scared and FUCKED for life...

i agree.. there are MANY nude pics that are art-forms.... but.. seriously... when you have a 3 year old boy in tight-blue underwear standing on a bed and ATTEMPTING to pose like a playgirl model... that ain't no art to me!!

don't know what i'm talking about??
http://www.boyfolio.com
see for yourself.. sure.. SOME people do look younger than others... but no 18 year old will look like a 10 year old.. or even a 3 year old!!

now.. would you not think that 2 10 year old boys showering NAKED together could be perceived as PORNO?! where is the art in that?!?!

check the links before you speak... you have a point.. but not with *THIS* material....

[stupidzbu]

Domain Name: BOYFOLIO.COM

Administrative Contact:
Allastair, Delphin (DAJ291) [email protected]
Boys Magazine
11054 Ventura Blvd.
STUDIO CITY , CA 91604
8182713126
Technical Contact:
ValueWeb (HOS237-ORG) [email protected]
ValueWeb
3250 west commercial Blvd.
Ft Lauderdale FL 33309
US
954-334-8000
Fax- - 954-334-8001
Billing Contact:
Invoice Processing System (IPS2-ORG) [email protected]
3250 West Commercial Blvd #200
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309
US
954-334-8000
Fax- 954-334-8001

Record last updated on 05-Feb-2000.
Record expires on 05-Feb-2002.
Record created on 05-Feb-2000.
Database last updated on 31-May-2001 08:17:00 EDT.

Domain servers in listed order:

NS.VALUEWEB.NET 216.219.253.211
NS2.VALUEWEB.NET 216.219.254.10

---------------------------

Kidspank Magazine (MYKIDSPANK-DOM)
11054 Ventura Blvd #342
Universal City, CA 91604
US

Domain Name: MYKIDSPANK.COM

Administrative Contact, Billing Contact:
Kidspank Magazine (V20535-OR) [email protected]
Kidspank Magazine
11054 Ventura Blvd #342
Universal City, CA 91604
US
8184243637
Technical Contact:
WorldNIC Name Host (HOST-ORG) [email protected]
Network Solutions, Inc.
505 Huntmar Park Drive
Herndon, VA 20170-5142
1-888-642-9675

Record last updated on 20-May-2001.
Record expires on 20-May-2002.
Record created on 20-May-2001.
Database last updated on 31-May-2001 08:17:00 EDT.

Domain servers in listed order:

NS.STHEART.COM 64.70.191.46
NS2.PRIMARYDNS.COM 216.219.239.8

[stupidzbu]

proActive Networks (KIDSPANK2-DOM)
410 Weston Blvd., Suite 410
PITTSBURGH, PA 15253
US

Domain Name: KIDSPANK.COM

Administrative Contact:
Sheman, Martin (MSR398) [email protected]
proActive Networks
410 Weston Blvd., Suite 410
PITTSBURGH , PA 15253
8005213269
Technical Contact:
ValueWeb (HOS237-ORG) [email protected]
ValueWeb
3250 west commercial Blvd.
Ft Lauderdale FL 33309
US
954-334-8000
Fax- - 954-334-8001
Billing Contact:
Invoice Processing System (IPS2-ORG) [email protected]
3250 West Commercial Blvd #200
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309
US
954-334-8000
Fax- 954-334-8001

Record last updated on 22-Jan-2000.
Record expires on 22-Jan-2002.
Record created on 22-Jan-2000.
Database last updated on 31-May-2001 13:31:00 EDT.

Domain servers in listed order:

NS.VALUEWEB.NET 216.219.253.211
NS2.VALUEWEB.NET 216.219.254.10

[hapoo]

1. I dont even want to ask why you have all these links
2. This is the first time you haven't said anything stupid!!!!

[oblongmelon]

it's just plain SICK. and there is NO WAY around it.

[topane]

<arnold schwartznegger>They must be terminated</arnold schwartznegger>

[m0j0]

it would be a darned shame if someone were to do a mass denial of service attack on them.......

[cruelpupet]

But I'm not gonna follow your links.

Now while the servers you pointed out are located in the US, they could easily move them offshore. Some countries consider the age of consent 14 and some probably even younger. So there really is no way to get rid of it.

Personally, I think nothing should be illegal online. It's the World Wide Web and every society has different standards. Now before you all flame me about the child porn issue, I'm sure those that look at it have more than just pictures online. If they really have a fetish for it, I would think that they would have magazines, tapes, etc... and you could throw them in jail for that.

[stupidzbu]

Originally posted by cruelpupet
But I'm not gonna follow your links.

If they really have a fetish for it, I would think that they would have magazines, tapes, etc... and you could throw them in jail for that.

well.. if you were to view the page to know what you were talking about.. you would see that one of them IS a magazine.. and DOES have movies!!!


enough said

[TheLoneGunman]

Originally posted by cruelpupet
Some countries consider the age of consent 14 and some probably even younger.

In HAWAII (one of the 50 states) 14 is the legal age of consent.

Check it out: http://www.ageofconsent.com/

[cruelpupet]

Originally posted by stupidzbu

Originally posted by cruelpupet
But I'm not gonna follow your links.

If they really have a fetish for it, I would think that they would have magazines, tapes, etc... and you could throw them in jail for that.

well.. if you were to view the page to know what you were talking about.. you would see that one of them IS a magazine.. and DOES have movies!!!


enough said

I think you misunderstood me...I was saying that people would own magazines and tapes, if they were really into it, and you could arrest them on that, instead of a few kiddi pics on a PC which might have just popped up

[Burzhui]

Cruel Puppet i am with you 100%, everything should be legal on the web. Now, although i do not support child porn or child erotica... what the second site has is just child erotica, children posing and such... ever been to a nude beach in other countries? kids run around naked just like adults. Even plain beaches in europe have kids running around naked anywhere up to the age of 12.
Now different countries have different ages of consent, does that mean that everyone has to obey the USA rules? Nah.

http://www.ageofconsent.com/

[Burzhui]

Oh yea and just to add... I go to Russian entertainment sites, like jokes, funny clips, etc etc... and obviously child porn is a problem in russia... so all these sites are supported by porn sites, many of them by child porn sites... now when you go to one of these sites you get like a billion and a half pop ups with pics of little kids in "weird and obscene poses", many times with adults (ewww freaky shit). Now obviously it get's saved in my cache, temp files, etc... now because of that am i a pervert and a pederast? I think not, but maybe someone out here thinks otherwise?

[cruelpupet]

and Burzhui has just proven my point, he has had child pics pop up that are now in his cache....now if he were arrested for having pics of kids on his PC, he'd be up shits creek without a paddle.

[MadMOO]

Originally posted by m0j0
naked is naked. naked is porn.

Ever seen that pornographic statue of david in Florence?

[/\/ew \/\/izard]

That is sick

[cruelpupet]

what about all that porn in art museums....you know the lady on the shell (venus i believe it is called) or what about the religious paintings with the naked cherubs, they should be burned...its child porn.

[stupidzbu]

Originally posted by Burzhui

Now different countries have different ages of consent, does that mean that everyone has to obey the USA rules? Nah.

i agree... different countries have different social norms... accept different things.... etc etc...

no.. NOBODY has to abide by US laws.. EXCEPT people in the US.. thats why they are US laws... right?

well.. look at where these web pages are located.... some services are in CALIFORNIA and others are in FLORIDA

as much as I would love to remove florida from our states.. cause they are all idiots there... you can't help but AGREE with me.. that these sites are NOT located outside of the united states......

therefore.... they SHOULD abide by US laws.... no matter where the hell they took the pictures!
US laws.. say kiddie porn is bad... different states have different laws... true.. but in cali.. it is 18! and florida.. it's 16 for women 18 for men!!!!

so.. what do you have to say about that?!

[/\/ew \/\/izard]

OK? What's wrong with Florida? On what (dare I ask) do you base that Florida should be removed from the Union and that they are all idiots? Small penis syndrom perhaps?

You cannot make people in FL abide by the Laws from MA or people from CA abide by NY laws. It's not the way it works, the problem with the internet is that there are no boarders and no law makers. I think that sites should have total freedom of speech while abiding by the laws of the country/state they are in. Not by the laws of the coutry/state of the people viewing the material.

[stupidzbu]

Originally posted by /\/ew \/\/izard
OK? What's wrong with Florida? On what (dare I ask) do you base that Florida should be removed from the Union and that they are all idiots? Small penis syndrom perhaps?

You cannot make people in FL abide by the Laws from MA or people from CA abide by NY laws. It's not the way it works, the problem with the internet is that there are no boarders and no law makers. I think that sites should have total freedom of speech while abiding by the laws of the country/state they are in. Not by the laws of the coutry/state of the people viewing the material.

what the hell are you saying?

the problem with florida was a joke relating to the 2000 elections.....

the SERVERS are in florida & california... NEITHER of which allow child pornography.....

who cares where they are viewed!! what matters is where they are located!! with you statements then, you agree that these should be removed because they don't abide by US laws... right?

[m0j0]

Originally posted by MadMOO

Originally posted by m0j0
naked is naked. naked is porn.

Ever seen that pornographic statue of david in Florence?

call off the dogs! i didn't say porn was wrong. i was with the child porn thing being wrong. and the cherubs that cruel talks about....that is another story.

i am gonna have to just say that i don't see pix of naked children as good in any way. there will obviously be a lot of different cases where they may be ok, and others where it is not. i will not pretend to know which art is acceptable and which is not.

we obviously have some good examples that make a good case point here.

can we all at least agree that the pix that involve lewdness are not good? such as those that are shown in sexual acts? and those that may imply sexual acts? and maybe even throw in the abusive ones (kidspank)?

[Burzhui]

Florida is America's wang, and they fuc*ed up with the ballots for that they should be deported or something. Now we have to suffere through 4 years of Bush.

P.S. I cleared my cache so don't try anything funny