Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: They now need a DeCSS for Music CDs

  1. #1
    Rear Admiral Lower Half TheLoneGunman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Grassy Knoll
    Posts
    2,491
    The major music labels are putting a new copy protection on their music CDs:

    http://news.independent.co.uk/digita...sp?story=90646

    I suppose this is similar to the DVD encryption schemes.

    If CDs were so overpriced (why are they more than cassettes when they are clearly cheaper to produce?) then perhaps I would pay the money.

    I would be happy to kick the artist back $0.50 (what they would make from a CD anyway) and then just grab the music from a file sharing site.
    TheLoneGunman, the TheLoneGunman logo, these smarmy posts, the mess in his house, and his silly ebay auctions, among others, are registered trademarks and/or registered service marks and/or associated works of TheLoneGunman in the United States and other countries. Other parties' trademarks or service marks are the property of their respective owners and should be treated as such.

  2. #2
    Arrrhh! coleslaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    LI NY
    Posts
    6,807
    I think this is the encryption that places small pieces of static embedded within each track. Regular CD players are designed to filter out this static because they could be caused by small scratches, etc. However, when a digital copy is attempted, this filtering is not applied, so the static is carried over as well. This is intended to deter people from simply ripping their CDs into MP3 format and then sharing them online. However, I don't see anything stopping people from recording their CDs via an analog means. Simply take a pass-through cable from the analog output into a recorder and voila, digital media.
    A priest, a paladin and Varimathras walk into a bar...

  3. #3
    Rear Admiral Lower Half TheLoneGunman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Grassy Knoll
    Posts
    2,491
    So if someone did a "disk image" copy (like they used to do on copy protected diskettes) then everything would copy fine and you would still have the static screened on the copy.

    Choice #2 is to simply have a pattern filter recognize the filler static when ripping the CD and simply ignore it (similar to tearing the embedded stuff out of a photo--descreening it)
    TheLoneGunman, the TheLoneGunman logo, these smarmy posts, the mess in his house, and his silly ebay auctions, among others, are registered trademarks and/or registered service marks and/or associated works of TheLoneGunman in the United States and other countries. Other parties' trademarks or service marks are the property of their respective owners and should be treated as such.

  4. #4
    Arrrhh! coleslaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    LI NY
    Posts
    6,807
    The emedded protection is to prevent people from simply ripping CDs to a digital format rather than making copies of the CD (to another CD). You would easily be able to do a bit-for-bit copy and maintain the ability to play the copied CD in a normal player.
    A priest, a paladin and Varimathras walk into a bar...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •