Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Osama Bin Laden is guilty REGARDLESS of if he masterminded these acts

  1. #1
    Rear Admiral Lower Half TheLoneGunman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Grassy Knoll
    Posts
    2,491

    Osama Bin Laden is guilty REGARDLESS of if he masterminded these acts

    In the bombings of the US Embassies in Africa and in the bombing of the WTC in 1993, there was clear and convincing evidence that Osama was guilty.
    It was simply that he was on the loose that kept him from being convicted.

    Therefore, whether or not he committed these recent acts, he deserves death.

    The plan in 1993 was to topple the WTC towers. Only faulty engineering on the bomb makers' parts caused it not to occur. Those bombers should be treated just the same as the terrorists who actually succeeded.

    (corrected date -- thanks)
    Last edited by TheLoneGunman; 09-12-2001 at 08:19 PM.

  2. #2
    hot in velour pants Burzhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    9,200
    I agree, he has to die.. HAS TO DIE
    ____________________
    IF A FAT GIRL FALLS IN THE WOODS
    DO THE TREES LAUGH?

  3. #3
    Lieutenant
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    The Land of Igloos and Dogsleds
    Posts
    249

    Re: Osama Bin Laden is guilty REGARDLESS of if he masterminded these acts

    Originally posted by TheLoneGunman
    In the bombings of the US Embassies in Africa and in the bombing of the WTC in 1983, there was clear and convincing evidence that Osama was guilty.
    It was simply that he was on the loose that kept him from being convicted.

    Therefore, whether or not he committed these recent acts, he deserves death.

    The plan in 1983 was to topple the WTC towers. Only faulty engineering on the bomb makers' parts caused it not to occur. Those bombers should be treated just the same as the terrorists who actually succeeded.
    Don't you mean 1993?

    And I was just thinking. If we couldn't take out bid Laden in the eight years subsequent to the first bombing, what makes us think we can get him now? And if the answer is "we're going to use greater resources", why were we holding back before? Wasn't the 1993 bombing severe enough to take seriously?

  4. #4
    Lieutenant Junior Grade Jpeace121's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    The County
    Posts
    146
    I completely agree with the sentiment here. Bin Laden has to go down, and go down hard.

    However, as I thought about this to myself earlier today, and how we should put a giant target on this guy and make him a wet spot on a wall somewhere, it occurred to me. Once we do that, we will have a mess of significant proportions on our hands. I thought to myself earlier, and I'll pose the question here. What would happen if we took out Bin Laden? I have to believe that there would be a significant and violent reaction from Afganistan/Taliban, etc. Would it be World War III?

    I don't want to be reactionary here, but I have heard how many and fervent the followers of Bin Laden are. What would their reaction be, and what would all of that lead to?


    Hey, I'm the drummer.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •