Results 1 to 28 of 28

Thread: Taliban Warn of Revenge if U.S. Attacks Afghanistan

  1. #1
    hot in velour pants Burzhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    9,200

    Taliban Warn of Revenge if U.S. Attacks Afghanistan

    http://us.news2.yimg.com/f/42/31/7m/...ghan_dc_2.html

    KABUL (Reuters) - Afghanistan (news - web sites)'s ruling Taliban warned on Friday of revenge ``by other means'' if the United States attacked their country in retaliation for the deadly terror attacks on Washington and New York.

    The warning came as fundamentalist Taliban clerics in the capital used Friday prayers to urge the world's Muslims to unite against the U.S.

    ``Oh Muslims of the world, we should unite together if the United States attacks us,'' one cleric told the faithful at a Kabul mosque. The theme was repeated across the capital.

    Washington says Osama bin Laden (news - web sites), who lives in Afghanistan as a ``guest'' of the Taliban, is a prime suspect in connection with Tuesday's deadly attacks. It has vowed to strike against those responsible as well as any country which harbours them.

    Abdul Hai Mutamaen, the Taliban's chief spokesman, warned of revenge if the U.S. attacked. ``We will take revenge if America attacks through different means,'' he told reporters without elaborating.


    BASTARDS
    Last edited by Burzhui; 09-14-2001 at 09:01 AM.
    ____________________
    IF A FAT GIRL FALLS IN THE WOODS
    DO THE TREES LAUGH?

  2. #2
    FREE TO BOTHER SOME OTHER FORUM
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    3,539
    Well, honestly, what do you expect them to do? There's going to be a serious smackdown laid on them: did you think they were going to just let it happen? Fanatical or not, these people have constituents that they are supposed to protect. If I had no other recourse, idle threats that might pursuade the US to be more peaceful or at least rethink their attack would be the first and best thing I could think of.

    Furthermore, it's obvious they're on everyone's **** list. So appealing to other country's religious leanings that may not like the US so much anyway seems as good an angle as I can think of too.

  3. #3
    Are they dense?!? What's with the "Oh Muslims of the world...lets unite against the US" crap?

    Since when did the US single out Muslim and try to kill them off because of their beliefs? Idiots. These Taliban morons are missing a few screws up there. Somehow, I wonder what these "other means" are. (more terrorist attacks?) I'm normally not one to place quick judgement and point fingers, but I kind of feel like they are hiding something and are beginning to panic. I mean if they aren't in anyway responsible or associated with this whole mess, why won't they just cooperate with the US? And if they deem terrorism as unacceptable, why don't they help the US find out who was responsible? Are their morals THAT messed up?

    All that crap about "children of Afghanistan" feeling our pain and sorrow...my @ss. I guess you can teach stupidity after all.

  4. #4
    Vice Admiral Cheesypuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Cali, but missing Hong Kong and Texas
    Posts
    4,783
    Why do they want to piss off a bee hive
    Life is like toilet paper, long and useful!
    The stars at night, are big and bright *clap 4x* deep in the heart of TEXAS!

  5. #5
    If it was them the only form of revenge they will be able to enact is having insuts about the US carved on their tombstones. The only effect this has is that their clergy have identified themselves as legitimate miitary targets.
    In Afganistan Hate is a religon. They try to call it Islam, but it isn't Islam. Islam is about peace.

  6. #6
    By the way, I have been hearing that Afghanistan has nukes. Any truth to that?

  7. #7
    Rear Admiral Lower Half
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    2,917
    If they have them, they have them because they bought them on the black market. They sure as hell did not develop them themselves. Even if they do have nukes, I'm quite sure they have no way of delivering them.
    I used to be into sadism, necrophilia and beastiality, but then I realized I was just beating a dead horse

  8. #8
    Chief of Naval Operations Markel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    11,874
    Originally posted by Butch
    Even if they do have nukes, I'm quite sure they have no way of delivering them.
    Backpacks?
    stay low... keep moving...

  9. #9
    hot in velour pants Burzhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    9,200
    LOL, well they can try to throw them
    ____________________
    IF A FAT GIRL FALLS IN THE WOODS
    DO THE TREES LAUGH?

  10. #10
    Originally posted by Markel

    Backpacks?
    Kind of hard to carry a backback when you are a small pile of ash, misclanious gasses, and some radioactive particles.

  11. #11
    the admiral formerly known as overclocked OC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Julian, NC
    Posts
    5,923
    Of course they are going to take up a righteous posture - it's the typical behavior of a bully. They hit us, we hit them, then they hit us for hitting them. There is only one way to handle a bully - knock him on his *ss.

    -OC

  12. #12
    FREE TO BOTHER SOME OTHER FORUM
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    3,539
    Originally posted by DarkFury
    They gonna light the scuds? I'm sure a "patriot" would have something to say about that.
    Yeah. Something like, "Here comes the scud, here comes the scud, I'm going to blow up the scud...dang, missed. Oh well, time to blow up a Saudi farm or something!"

    The Patriot was pretty inaccurate, and was more the creation of US propaganda.

  13. #13
    Originally posted by pennypinch


    Yeah. Something like, "Here comes the scud, here comes the scud, I'm going to blow up the scud...dang, missed. Oh well, time to blow up a Saudi farm or something!"

    The Patriot was pretty inaccurate, and was more the creation of US propaganda.
    The Patriots were designed to destroy an aerodynamic shape to prevent a missile or aircraft from hitting it's target. They are not effective against big 'ole bricks the Iraqi's called missiles. They were a make do answer to a situation we did not expect. We did not expect to have to beat down a third world nation. Just like you never expect to have to fight a 8 year old.
    The Patriot is an effective weapon in it's designed role.

  14. #14
    hot in velour pants Burzhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    9,200
    I say if you innhialate them they can't get you back
    ____________________
    IF A FAT GIRL FALLS IN THE WOODS
    DO THE TREES LAUGH?

  15. #15
    Originally posted by overclocked
    Of course they are going to take up a righteous posture - it's the typical behavior of a bully. They hit us, we hit them, then they hit us for hitting them. There is only one way to handle a bully - knock him on his *ss.

    -OC
    Don't forget to kick them while they are down. That way they learn that they never want to piss us off again.

  16. #16
    Rear Admiral Lower Half TheLoneGunman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Grassy Knoll
    Posts
    2,491
    over 3000 years ago, there was a simple solution to problems like this and they are still valid in this situation.

    Every member and supporter of the Taliban (man, woman, child) who advocates terror and violence will be wiped from the face of the Earth.

    The loyalists left = no revenge possible.

    Only when we choose to "turn the other cheek" do we get hit with the other fist.

  17. #17
    Fleet Admiral hapoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield USA
    Posts
    9,276
    Afghanistan may be on everyones **** list right now, but the fact is that we have no clue what goes on behind closed doors. We can watch the news all we want and get reports of who did what but i seriously doubt that we know everything. This is not to justify anyones actions, but i for one am not judging any person or country because I DONT KNOW WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON.

  18. #18
    FREE TO BOTHER SOME OTHER FORUM
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    3,539
    Originally posted by evilcyclops


    The Patriots were designed to destroy an aerodynamic shape to prevent a missile or aircraft from hitting it's target. They are not effective against big 'ole bricks the Iraqi's called missiles. They were a make do answer to a situation we did not expect. We did not expect to have to beat down a third world nation. Just like you never expect to have to fight a 8 year old.
    The Patriot is an effective weapon in it's designed role.
    Didn't know that.

  19. #19
    Rear Admiral Lower Half
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    2,917
    This issue of the types of missiles the Patriots were designed to hit is also coming up with the National Missile Defense system. Apparently, the system is designed to hit missiles that are spinning, and therefore, more stable. However, most missiles by rogue states would not be advanced enough to have that stabilization built in. The missiles would often be tumbling end over end and much more difficult for the interceptor to hit.
    I used to be into sadism, necrophilia and beastiality, but then I realized I was just beating a dead horse

  20. #20
    Rear Admiral Lower Half The Happy Squirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    the castle beyond the goblin city
    Posts
    2,914
    they ahve stated up front and in the open that thier policy is, any American is an enemy and an executable enemy.

    i dont know bout anyone else but i dont see a 5yrs kid being an enemy
    or the 90 yr old manin a wheelchair

    we should adopt the policy that they have
    they wanna fight a "kill-em-all" war that we should pull up our bootstraps and kick some ass
    Lion face / lemon face!

  21. #21
    Rear Admiral Lower Half
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    2,917
    The Taliban is not well liked in Afghanistan, and I'm sure the majority of the country would like to see the Taliban removed from power. The citizens there are not the enemy, it is really only the government and the religious fanatics. The people there suffer tremendously and I would feel bad to see them further hurt by indiscriminate "ass kicking" . . .
    I used to be into sadism, necrophilia and beastiality, but then I realized I was just beating a dead horse

  22. #22
    the admiral formerly known as overclocked OC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Julian, NC
    Posts
    5,923
    Originally posted by Butch
    The Taliban is not well liked in Afghanistan, and I'm sure the majority of the country would like to see the Taliban removed from power. The citizens there are not the enemy, it is really only the government and the religious fanatics. The people there suffer tremendously and I would feel bad to see them further hurt by indiscriminate "ass kicking" . . .
    I know what you mean. I've read some articles over the last few days about how hated the Taliban is by the citizens of Afghanistan. If it is shown that the Taliban supported Bin Laden (which is strongly believed but has yet to be proven) then is it a certainty that innocent Afghanis will die in our retaliation. All through history, citizens have paid the price of the policies of their government, in peacetime and in war.

    -OC

  23. #23
    Great, they can help us root out all the Taliban supporters after they Uncanditionaly surrender. Then we can build them up like we did Japan and Germany. They can be our allied nation in the middle east in a few decades.

  24. #24
    Rear Admiral Lower Half TheLoneGunman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Grassy Knoll
    Posts
    2,491
    Originally posted by The Happy Squirrel
    i dont know bout anyone else but i dont see a 5yrs kid being an enemy
    or the 90 yr old manin a wheelchair
    There are 5 year old kids that have used guns to kill people and the guns kill just as easily no matter what your age.

    As far as a wheelchair, there is an elderly blind Sheik (Abdul Rahman) in a wheelchair (he was that way when he was charged) presently serving life without parole because of a conviction for terrorism. He is obviously a threat still and there are others like him.

    What is to keep a man like that from putting a bomb in his wheelchair (especially since it would be harder to detect because of the metal) and also because people would be less likely to want to check in detail.

  25. #25
    Vice Admiral Nanotech9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Gone Wheeling!
    Posts
    4,409
    Originally posted by Butch
    This issue of the types of missiles the Patriots were designed to hit is also coming up with the National Missile Defense system. Apparently, the system is designed to hit missiles that are spinning, and therefore, more stable. However, most missiles by rogue states would not be advanced enough to have that stabilization built in. The missiles would often be tumbling end over end and much more difficult for the interceptor to hit.

    mmmkay, so what makes a missile go forwards, if it tumbling? did they launch them outta pea-shooters?

  26. #26
    Originally posted by Nanotech9



    mmmkay, so what makes a missile go forwards, if it tumbling? did they launch them outta pea-shooters?
    Once the chemical energy is expended the inertia from the original boost. Some balistic missiles might have controls such as small engines and/or movable ffins to direct the missile.

    US cruise missles are different. They combine a chemical thruster to give the initial boost and have a turbine to drive it once it is up to speed.

  27. #27
    Rear Admiral Lower Half
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    2,917
    This is the abstract of the article I was basing the statement on. I would have posted the full article, but it is no longer available for free on the NY Times website.

    August 27, 2001, Monday
    Achilles' Heel In Missile Plan: Crude Weapons
    By WILLIAM J. BROAD
    Source: The New York Times
    Section: Foreign Desk
    1609 words

    Abstract
    Federal and private experts say missile defense system planned by Bush administration may be least able to destroy warheads from rogue countries thought to pose biggest threat; nations like North Korea, Iran and Iraq would fire wobbling, rudimentary warheads during attack, which are among hardest to hit; stopping rudimentary missile would be far harder than hitting advanced warheads, which are made to spin like tops or footballs to increase accuracy; crude warhead fired by inexperienced attacker is likely to have no spin stabilization and to gyrate wildly, tumbling end over end and making it harder to track; diagram (M)
    I used to be into sadism, necrophilia and beastiality, but then I realized I was just beating a dead horse

  28. #28
    Rear Admiral Lower Half The Happy Squirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    the castle beyond the goblin city
    Posts
    2,914
    Originally posted by TheLoneGunman


    There are 5 year old kids that have used guns to kill people and the guns kill just as easily no matter what your age.

    As far as a wheelchair, there is an elderly blind Sheik (Abdul Rahman) in a wheelchair (he was that way when he was charged) presently serving life without parole because of a conviction for terrorism. He is obviously a threat still and there are others like him.

    What is to keep a man like that from putting a bomb in his wheelchair (especially since it would be harder to detect because of the metal) and also because people would be less likely to want to check in detail.

    im talking in a organized way agaainst the Taliban and other supporsts and such

    they consider that we are going to put our children up against them like they do
    we dont fight in that style and they should know that

    you must have misunderstood my intentions

    im talking Americans do not do this type of things in an organized fation
    there are always isloated insidents and never attacks on the muslims
    this is not the norm or status quo and that waht i was trying to convey
    tehy are targeting us if it was
    Lion face / lemon face!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •