Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Harry Potter or Lord of Rings

  1. #1

    Harry Potter or Lord of Rings

    Which do you prefer?
    Jason on Fox Trot prefers LotR, as does Ed Robertson from BNL (as witnessed at the last concert I went to- "sparkly accordians are harry potter while sparkly guitars, well, they're lord of the rings!"

    Since I don't remember reading LotR, I prefer Harry Potter. Maybe I'll read the books soon.

  2. #2
    Chief of Naval Operations Jenny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Kansas City area
    Posts
    10,947
    I haven't read either or seen Harry Potter yet, but I'd like to see it. My hubby has read all the LoTR books and is going to take me to see the movie in December. All I have to say is "Mmmmm, yummy. Elijah Wood." He's only 20 but he's a cutie!

    Last edited by Jenny; 11-21-2001 at 07:17 PM.
    Check out my spoilers for over 20 shows @ SpoilerFix.com

    Check out my TV blog, where I post weekly & daily TV
    schedules, TV news, interviews with TV stars & more!
    All new TV forums as well @ TV Is My Pacifier

  3. #3
    the lemonizer sho.gun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Calabasas, CA
    Posts
    5,374
    LOTR looks muy cool compared to potter, I saw it and wasn't too impressed. I mean maybe it'll appeal to 10-15 year olds, but I haven't even read the book. Anyway, from what I've seen LOTR looks more interesting.

  4. #4
    Admiral spigidygak's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Redlands & San Diego, CA.
    Posts
    5,882
    Neither, never really got into that genre.

  5. #5
    Chief of Naval Operations Nija's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    City of The Dead
    Posts
    13,561
    I actually want to see them both. Never read either book, or anything..

    "Nija is the dark soul of gotapex. We don't like to talk about him." - LPMiller

  6. #6
    Lieutenant
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    The Land of Igloos and Dogsleds
    Posts
    249
    Neither. They're both kids books. That said, I'll probably see LOTR at a matinee or the cheap theater, just for the cinematography. No interest in seeing Potter.

  7. #7
    Chief of Naval Operations attgig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    the burbs of baltimore
    Posts
    11,965
    LOTR
    harry potter = evil

  8. #8
    Admiral Ladogaboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Hiding amongst the minnows
    Posts
    6,843
    Originally posted by chosenfool
    LOTR, definitely. i grew up reading the books, and it would be interesting how they translate such rich content into a feature film...
    I originally didn't want to watch LoTR (I don't really like Elijah Wood), because I didn't think that a movie maker was going to be able to capture the grandeur of Tolkien's stories. But after seeing the previews, I'm hooked. I will be there, in the over-priced theaters, watching hobbits and elves fight for their lives.

    The reason I haven't even mention Harry up to this point is because I got 13 pages into the book (and yes, it is a fast read), got bored with it, put it down and never went back. I MIGHT try reading it again, but no time soon.
    It is not enough to merely touch the face of god; you also must open your eyes so that you may see your palm.

  9. #9
    Admiral ArkiStan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Recession Central
    Posts
    5,898
    Lord of The Rings is getting amazing reviews. Even better than Harry Potter. It's supposedly a mega budget movie that lives up to the hype and investment. Looks like a must-see.

    Let's All Go To The Mo~vies~... Let's All Go To The Mo~vies~ ...

  10. #10
    Ruler-Of-All-Things-Beer BrewMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    10,249
    i read the Hobbit as a kid. i loved it. i've never read any of the LoTR sereis though. I can't wait for LoTR though. Potter was ok, i enjoyed it, but not worth all the hype. I love Tollkien, he is an awesome writer and was good friends with C.S. Lewis, another one of my favorite authors. Definately LoTR over Potter.
    Last edited by BrewMaster; 12-21-2001 at 11:22 PM.

  11. #11
    Lieutenant Commander
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    Posts
    807
    Harry Potter, gh3y, Lord of the Rings, not gh3y. (sorry for l4me gh3y speak, its that time of the night again)

    ...screw you guys, i'm going home

  12. #12
    Ruler-Of-All-Things-Beer BrewMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    10,249
    as i said in a thread in Off Topic, the real measure of a movie is it's trolls. the troll in LoTR would kick the arse of the troll in Harry Potter. the wizard kids from Harry Potter would stand no chance against the troll from LoTR, therefore LoTR is the better movie. case closed.

  13. #13
    Rear Admiral Upper Half
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Del Mar
    Posts
    3,477
    LOTR by a long shot....so much better....kooler bad guys
    goose goose goose goose goose goose goose goose goose goose goose goose goose goose goose goose

  14. #14
    Rear Admiral Upper Half TofuNinja's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    On Serenity
    Posts
    3,503
    Saw Harry PotteR Twice, once before reading and once after, Going to see LOTR this saturday.

    As far as book reading the language of Harry Potter is easier to read than Lord of the Rings.... but I am sure there is a reason LOTR has been a fan favorite for so long. Both are good for difference reason I guess.

    My roomie saw both and he liked LOTR better due to the action and fight scenes. However he started reading Harry Potter due to that movie .....
    "To search for the old is to understand the new." -Gichin Funakoshi-

    ===>>>LABELED CANTACUZENE'S DUMBEST PERSON ALIVE!!!<<<===


  15. #15
    Lieutenant
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    The Land of Igloos and Dogsleds
    Posts
    249
    Originally posted by chosenfool


    LOTR series are kids books? you HAVE read all 3 books and the prequel (The Hobbit), right? too dark to be enjoyable by kids (as much as hary potter is kinda dark in itself, but at an acceptable kids' level)....

    anyhoo, im probably gonna do the same - find some matinee show for cheaper seats. its not easy being broke...
    Im 99% sure all four books were in my elementary school's library (grades K-7, ages 5-12), I know for sure the Hobbit was. I read the Hobbit when I was 9 or 10 and the other three in the next couple years.

    Unfortunately, TV and video games have eroded my attention span to roughly that of a fruit fly, so I don't read nearly as much as I did when I was a kid. Oh well, it's my parents' fault for buying me that Nintendo with Super Mario Brothers/Duckhunt.

  16. #16
    Ruler-Of-All-Things-Beer BrewMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    10,249
    yes, the LoTR seriesd and the Hobbit are kids books, but that doesn't stop adults from lovign them.

  17. #17
    Lieutenant Junior Grade Rubberduckyluvr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Riverside, CA
    Posts
    133
    I saw harry potter and lord of the rings. I liked lord of the rings better. I would love to read both book series but childrens books or not i don't like to read since i do a lot for school, but i am actually considering making an exception for LOTR.

    I hate it when you have to wait a year at the movies to figure what the end of the story is i am not patient.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •