Was that the posing Staples customer service guy?
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by StonedWheat:
Was that the posing Staples customer service guy? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
kind of. the staples guy's(ConsumerAdvocate aka Vladik) partner in crime, Vadimr, (or HIM with an alias, we dont know) was causing ruckus and threating to hack the board down....
the argument with vadimr aka Vladik was really fun and alot of people missed out. Maybe it should have just been moved off topic or into suckage instead of deleted. Alot of people missed it and are asking what it was about. I think its important b/c it shows what these guys were really up to, and how shady they are, and how they "hate" us and want to destroy our board. that guy is a moron. I know pennypinch had fun too...oh well
PS this should be safe from reargument cause i dont think Vadimr even knows this section exists
PLUS: Interesting "Factoids"
1)"ConsumerAdvocate" posted the Buy.com $50 coupon that many of us got screwed on...
2) He was a snitch to Staples on coupons...
3)He then told the press that people were "talking abvantage" of buy.com...
4) we got screwed. he got press coverage. do the math..
He is harmful to us, and tries to screw us over, for staples and buy.com. He should be banned from this forum like he is and anandtech. He is greedy and tries to trick everyone. "Off with his head"...
i never saw this post he made about a Staples Diablo 2 deal.. no one supports me?
Posted By Vadimr:
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>THE BEST DEAL EVER! Little hard to do but I just printed this out and went to staples and they honered it, they gave me diablo 2 free plus some other game so i just don't show that post to anyone else
[This message has been edited by AJ (edited 07-10-2000).]
Lieutenant Junior Grade
The thread was fun to read. But I agree with the deletion.
Those who are regular Got Apex users were able to see how shady and self-serving these guys were.
But, some of the insults that were being tossed around were not representative of the maturity of the rest of the board and should not be there.