Yep - the city, Dodge and the guys with the dirt mound. I want to kneecap the attorney. http://www.dailynews.com/antelopevalley/ci_3335378
Yep - the city, Dodge and the guys with the dirt mound. I want to kneecap the attorney. http://www.dailynews.com/antelopevalley/ci_3335378
Wait a second... you're telling me Sixpac Shakur is a CHICK?


I'm OK with him winning, as long as the judgement requires him to either walk or ride a tricycle everywhere he goes from now on. What a bonehead.
Sounds like he let off the gas at the wrong time - something you can't do with that type of car (dependent on rear wheels for traction and therefore weight shift to the rear under throttle) without your rear end fishtailing. Still, he wasn't legally drunk.
It sounds like he just screwed up while driving. I don't see any merit for a lawsuit.
Didn't Kelsey Grammer do the same thing in his Viper a few years ago?
He wasn't leagaly drunk when they tested him an hour after the accident. Assuming a normal weight and metabolisim he was probably about 0.09 to0.10% BAH when the accidnet occured.Originally Posted by Houdini
yeah this lawsuit sounds completely bogus. drunk or not drunk, this is absolutely ridiculous that a person incorrectly operating a high-risk vehicle is entitled to sue.
If con is the opposite of pro, then what's the opposite of progress?
So he couldn't drive if his life depends on it and now he sues? Those justices are idiots too for allowing this to happen.![]()
Dell Dimension 9200 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (2.4GHz) | 4x1GB DDR2 | 256MB nVidia GeForce 8800GT
Dell Studio 17 | Intel Core i7-720QM (1.6GHz) | 6GB DDR3 1066MHz | 1GHz ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Intel P4-C 3.0GHz | ECS 865PE-A | 3x512MB PC3200 | 128MB PNY GeForce 6600GT
http://[img]http://sfx-images.mozill....gif[/img]
Inferring his BAC based on a delayed test isn't necessarily valid and won't stand up in court as a testament to his possible excessive BAC at the time of the accident. At any rate, don't drink and drive.Originally Posted by Grimm
![]()
Bookmarks